I know a couple, not friends but I know of them.
Both of them worked until recently, one full time, one part time.
They have had a baby. The mum has, for all intents and purposes, given up work. The dad now works p/t because they get more in benefits if he only works p/t. So they get more or the same income as they did before having the baby when he was working f/t and she was working p/t than they do now with only one of them working p/t.
Aibu to be curious as to how the population of MN view this?
I know that the general consensus seems to be that if you have kids you shouldn't claim any more benefits that you actually need to survive and that you should pay for your kids yourself if you can.
But equally so I've seen similar threads where a couple have been praised for being savvy enough about the benefits system to work out that they have had a better income by working less.
So which would in be in this situation?
Fwiw I don't necessarily agree with it but that is less a comment on the couple themselves and more of an issue with the way the benefits system works that means it is more financially viable for many families in many situations to do this.
I have nothing against benefits and have claimed them myself so no judgement against the couple!
Please or to access all these features
Please
or
to access all these features
AIBU?
to wonder what MN's view is on this?
80 replies
ciabattav0nbreadstickz · 24/03/2016 08:22
OP posts:
usual ·
24/03/2016 08:48
This reply has been deleted
Message withdrawn at poster's request.
Don’t want to miss threads like this?
Weekly
Sign up to our weekly round up and get all the best threads sent straight to your inbox!
Log in to update your newsletter preferences.
You've subscribed!
Please create an account
To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.