Skip to main content
Skip to main navigation
Skip to talk navigation

Active discussions

Please or to access all these features

Add post

Watch this thread

Save thread

Start a new thread

Flip thread

Hide thread

My feed

Saved Active Unanswered threads

Getting started FAQ's

Unanswered threads Acronyms Talk guidelines

Hide shortcut buttons

Talk

Flip

1 2 3 4 5 6 ··· 11 12

AIBU?

To think these two girls should get a slap..

298 replies

Jenj1983 · 04/01/2016 21:44

for putting super glue onto the seat of a DISABLED toilet??!

Read the story earlier, apparently the two teens are aged 16-18, and some poor 4yo girl went in after them and had the skin ripped from the back of her legs!
No doubt these two little twats will get a lecture and a wrist slap.

OP posts:

Report

DisgraceToTheYChromosome · 04/01/2016 21:51

Hopefully they'll be charged with assault occasioning actual bodily harm, convicted, sued by the victim's parents and then be subject to a few years of toilet cleaning until their convictions are spent.

Jenj1983 · 04/01/2016 21:53

This reply has been deleted

Message deleted by MNHQ. Here's a link to our Talk Guidelines.

ilovesooty · 04/01/2016 21:54

I'd like to know if any of the users of this toilet actually had a disability.

Iliveinalighthousewiththeghost · 04/01/2016 21:54

Poor poor little girl. Bless her.
Pair of cunts.
They should be arrested charged with
Disablist behavior.
Criminal Damage.
The harm done to the to that poor little girl.
I mean not that it is excusable behavior at any age of course it's not but they're 16-18 ffs. Not little kids.
Also they should be banned from working anyone vulnerable seeing as they have such content toward them, and they do or they would not have done something so hideous.

Iliveinalighthousewiththeghost · 04/01/2016 21:55

That's not the point Sooty.

Jenj1983 · 04/01/2016 21:57

Totally agree Ilive. When I read I thought, the kids that done it will probably be about 11-14 something like that (like you said no excuse but anyway) then when I read 16-18 I thought WTAF.

OP posts:

ilovesooty · 04/01/2016 21:57

You might not think it's the point but I'm wondering if the perpetrators should have been in the disabled toilets and whether the four year old should have been there.

LaurieFairyCake · 04/01/2016 21:59

I think it's a hate crime

Jenj1983 · 04/01/2016 21:59

When the perpetrators are in the toilet pouring glue around the seat, I'm going to assume that no they were not disabled.
Apart from being a bit mental in the head obviously.

OP posts:

Jenj1983 · 04/01/2016 22:01

And ilovesooty a 4yo girl had the skin ripped off the back of her legs and her bum..
Who actually gives a crap if she should have or should not have been using the disabled toilet.

OP posts:

hownottofuckup · 04/01/2016 22:02

A 4 yr old ended up with her skin bring ripped off and you're worrying about toilet etiquette?
Are you really concerned upon hearing the story as to whether the 4 yr old has a disability or not?
Weird.
YY to hate crime.

ilovesooty · 04/01/2016 22:02

I'm assuming the perpetrators didn't have a disability and there's no suggestion that the victim had either. Obviously the act is reprehensible but the disabled toilet had been properly monitored it might not have happened.

cuntycowfacemonkey · 04/01/2016 22:02

Nasty little fuckers let's hope they are charged

hazeyjane · 04/01/2016 22:03

putting superglue on any toilet seat is fucking heinous.

I don't think speculating whether the 4 year old was right to be using the toilet is appropriate really!

MooneyWormtailPadfootProngs · 04/01/2016 22:03

Isn't the disabled toilet also baby changing?

As a disabled woman and a mother I have no problem with parents taking kids to use disabled loos, sometimes it's easier with more space.

Iliveinalighthousewiththeghost · 04/01/2016 22:03

Yes fully agree Laurie. It is hate crime,
I'm also saddened to see victim blaming as well.

rosebiggs · 04/01/2016 22:04

They probably chose the disabled toilet because they thought that they were less likely to get caught.
It's irrelevant whether the victim had a disability.

RickRoll · 04/01/2016 22:04

"I'd like to know if any of the users of this toilet actually had a disability."

Yes. Some of the users of the toilet had a disability.

MooneyWormtailPadfootProngs · 04/01/2016 22:04

How do you monitor a disabled toilet? What about disabilities people can't see? Should someone have to explain to a toilet guard what their disability is in order to be allowed in?

cuntycowfacemonkey · 04/01/2016 22:04

How exactly should a disabled toilet be properly monitored ilovesooty?

Notgivingin789 · 04/01/2016 22:04

If I was there, I would of shouted at those girls. Despicable.

RickRoll · 04/01/2016 22:05

"Obviously the act is reprehensible but the disabled toilet had been properly monitored it might not have happened."

How the fuck do you monitor a toilet?

hazeyjane · 04/01/2016 22:05

Obviously the act is reprehensible but the disabled toilet had been properly monitored it might not have happened.

...someone else would have had the skin ripped off their thighs, and whoever that was, it would be as agonising as it was for this poor little girl

ilovesooty · 04/01/2016 22:06

Of course not. I'm just suggesting that if the toilet had had to be accessed with a radar key the incident would have been less likely to happen.

PiperIsTerrysChoclateOrange · 04/01/2016 22:06

Ilovesooty ds aged 9 uses a disabled toilet.

He has an invisible disability, age is not deciding factor on disability.

What a nasty pair of young adults. I hope they are charged appropriately.

Flip

1 2 3 4 5 6 ··· 11 12

Please create an account

To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.