Talk

Advanced search

The Oxford English dictionary should add "could of"

(224 Posts)
DyslexicScientist Wed 16-Dec-15 14:09:20

Everyone knows what it means, and quite a lot of people use it. Just seems very stuffy to not add it. English is an adaptive language.

They've already added omg and a smiliey face was the word of the year. So they are not adverse to change.

DyslexicScientist Wed 16-Dec-15 14:09:43

And "should of"

overwhelmed34 Wed 16-Dec-15 14:11:07

Yabu fshock

Gottagetmoving Wed 16-Dec-15 14:11:14

It doesn't 'mean' anything.

ghnocci Wed 16-Dec-15 14:12:03

No. No no no no.

TheCarpenter Wed 16-Dec-15 14:12:35

YABU

BrianButterfield Wed 16-Dec-15 14:12:55

The OED might well add 'could of'. They are not guardians of the English language, they merely record it's usage. They added OMG as it is a word that is used in English, not because they regard it as 'proper' or believe it should be used.

TheSeptemberIssue Wed 16-Dec-15 14:13:02

Why should they add a lazy alternative which is two letters short of the actual words?

OfaFrenchmind2 Wed 16-Dec-15 14:13:39

YABU.
Seriously, do people have standards nowadays?

Seeyounearertime Wed 16-Dec-15 14:13:39

Well OP you could of given a definition and you should of really.

BrianButterfield Wed 16-Dec-15 14:13:41

I DID NOT ADD THAT APOSTROPHE IN ITS! Damn autocorrect!

reni2 Wed 16-Dec-15 14:14:31

They should add wha'evva, too then, "Everyone knows what it means, and quite a lot of people use it.".

Indantherene Wed 16-Dec-15 14:15:33

Just because some people can't write correct English doesn't make it right.

Goingtobeawesome Wed 16-Dec-15 14:15:41

No fucking way

Could of is an affectation. It sounds shit. It jars. It's wrong.

MaisieDotes Wed 16-Dec-15 14:16:19

People say "could've", "would've" and "should've" and that's ok.

Writing it down as "could of" is incorrect.

It won't be in the dictionary. Ever.

0PHELIA Wed 16-Dec-15 14:16:25

NOOOOOOOO

And

DFOD

BrianButterfield Wed 16-Dec-15 14:16:48

They will add any word that gets used sufficiently often to be recognised as a word in English. They do not distinguish between words people approve of or not.

GrouchyKiwi Wed 16-Dec-15 14:17:23

YABVVVU

They should add YABU, though.

helenahandbag Wed 16-Dec-15 14:17:39

shock

No! Even seeing it written here makes me want to punch my own teeth out.

YellowOfficeBlock Wed 16-Dec-15 14:17:53

Absolutely no way!!

If I read anything that uses "could of" "would of" etc it just jumps out at me immediately as wrong and then I can't take seriously whatever is being said.

goodnightdarthvader1 Wed 16-Dec-15 14:17:54

No. It's a written mistake based on an aural (hearing) pronunciation. "ve" sounds like "of" to (lazy) ears.

EvaBING Wed 16-Dec-15 14:18:03

No way.

MaisieDotes Wed 16-Dec-15 14:18:50

brian "could of" isn't a word.

0PHELIA Wed 16-Dec-15 14:18:55

PLEASE LOOK AT THIS

overwhelmed34 Wed 16-Dec-15 14:19:16

Next they will be adding 'another thing coming' (ouch hurts my brain just to type!)

Join the discussion

Join the discussion

Registering is free, easy, and means you can join in the discussion, get discounts, win prizes and lots more.

Register now