My feed
Premium

Please
or
to access all these features

AIBU?

To ask would you find it odd

40 replies

betweenmarchandmay · 05/02/2015 20:05

If you knew parents who lost a baby aged eighteen months and a few years later had another baby of the same gender and called them the same name?

No judgement - genuine question.

OP posts:
Report
FamiliesShareGerms · 05/02/2015 20:08

Yes

Report
BreakfastAtStephanies · 05/02/2015 20:09

Yes. Odd and creepy. I can be superstitious but this feels wrong.

Report
Findingthisdifficult1234 · 05/02/2015 20:09

Very odd!!

Report
disneymum3 · 05/02/2015 20:09

Yes

Report
mrsnoon · 05/02/2015 20:11

Yes, feels a bit like trying to rewrite history and almost erase the first child.

Report
nocoolnamesleft · 05/02/2015 20:12

I would find it extremely odd. But I would make damn sure that they never knew I thought that way. And I believe that if you go back a few generations, it was a much more common practice (back when a lot more children died young). Especially for family names. So...I would find it odd...but if it works for them, not having been through the loss they have experienced, I would think I had no right to judge.

Report
louisejxxx · 05/02/2015 20:12

Yes very odd - if it were me I would find it hard every time I heard the child's name that I'd lost...The thought to use it again would never even enter my mind.

Report
PestoSnowissimos · 05/02/2015 20:12

Yes

Odd & sad Sad

Report
3littlebadgers · 05/02/2015 20:13

Yes, but I guess it depends on if there is a cultural reason. For example,my midwife is named after her dead older sister which in her country is a sign of respect. She herself would have rathered her own unique name and feel like she had a lot to live up to/compensate for.

Report
ineedtogetthisout · 05/02/2015 20:14

It's not something I would choose to do, although I gave my dc my children's names as middle names.

I would absolutely never judge a grieving parent though. We all find our own ways to deal with this crushing pain that we live with each and every day.

Report
findingherfeet · 05/02/2015 20:15

Yes but how sad, perhaps just a way to honour their LO in their own way. They won't forget or replace him or her.

Report
MrsTawdry · 05/02/2015 20:15

No. I wouldn't. Sean O'Casey was named for his dead brother...it's something which some people find comforting.

Report
NorwaySpruce · 05/02/2015 20:15

I wouldn't find it odd, because it was pretty common to have that happen when my parents were growing up.

They are in their 70s now, and it was much more common to lose a child in infancy back then, so they know of a few occasions when it happened within our family.

Report
EyelinerQueen · 05/02/2015 20:15

Yes. I would find it odd.

DP's grandparents did this. FIL was the second 'Jim' (not really Jim) and once in a fight his mother said that the wrong Jim had died Shock Shock .

Report
TwelveLeggedWalk · 05/02/2015 20:15

Personally I would find it odd and jarring yes. But I would assume there were cultural/family tradition reasons for it and try very hard to question it (mentally, I'd never question anyone's choices like that aloud).

Report
SocialMediaAddict · 05/02/2015 20:17

Yes.

Report
Dragonlette · 05/02/2015 20:23

I think I'd find it odd, but I'd never judge anything that helps grieving parents.

It happened a lot in my family a few generations ago. When doing our family tree we found one generation with 6 children of the exact same name. The first 5 of them died before their first birthday Sad Sad , the sixth one was my great-great-great grandad (possibly a few more greats)

Report
attheendoftheday · 05/02/2015 20:23

I wouldn't find it odd. I think that if it feels ok to the parents then it's fine.

Report
TRexingInAsda · 05/02/2015 20:26

No, I would find it incredibly sad.

Report
lljkk · 05/02/2015 20:30

I'm not sure what odd means.
I'd be a little surprised and half wondering if they might expect too much of baby 2.
It used to be very common, though, you see this a lot in Family history records.

Report
ACSlater · 05/02/2015 20:32

Not odd but sad. They must be in a lot of pain to do that.

Report
ourglass · 05/02/2015 20:33

I wouldn't batter an eyelid to be honest.

Report

Don’t want to miss threads like this?

Weekly

Sign up to our weekly round up and get all the best threads sent straight to your inbox!

Log in to update your newsletter preferences.

You've subscribed!

watchingthedetectives · 05/02/2015 20:34

I probably wouldn't do it but I think if it helps the parents after such a tragic time then fair enough.

Report
InQuiteAPickle · 05/02/2015 20:38

Yes, I think I would think it odd and sad but on the other hand - is it much different from naming a baby after, say, a deceased Grandparent?

I met someone who had had still born twins, a boy and a girl. They had since had two more children and their oldest boy had the same name as their baby boy who died. Sad

Report
fuzzpig · 05/02/2015 20:38

I would really worry about the effect it would have on the 'second' one when they found out. :(

Report
Please create an account

To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.