Talk

bbc link

And this is the bit:

"However, Moore added: "He has made a mistake and maybe he hasn't apologised in the right way - and I know he has an appeal case pending - but if he gets on the park, he would go a long way to getting us out of trouble.""

ie if he can score goals I don't give a fuck about anything else.

It's a 'mistake' to rape someone? A mistake is to wrongly address a letter, or put too much salt in a recipe. To rape a young woman can't possibly have been an error surely? As in, "Ooops! I seem to have accidentally raped you. Sorry!"

NY resolution. Don't forget, no raping this year...

Moore is not the sharpest tool in the box. In fact, he is thick as pigshit. let's hope the fans stand up against this.

Disgusting. I hope Evans himself realizes that this is a big mistake and does the right thing.

Made a mistake? WTF?
And of course an apology made in the proper way would certainly alleviate his victim's trauma ...

Tesco are one of Hartlepool's sponsors...just sayin'

The only way I can understand this at all is if "they" still don't know what he actually did. A "mistake", MAYBE, to have slept with a drunken woman who set out to end up in a footballer's bed but that is so far away from what actually happened.

cos not many talented footballers around to choose from ?

as a monkey - hanger I am sickened.

I am not a betting woman, but if I were I would put a bet on Ched Evan's conviction being overturned at this 'accelerated' Appeal .I don't agree with that, but I have the feeling that is what is going to happen

sadly i am not surprised

would this not have to be agreed by some governing body

LOL TooHasty was that a deliberate reference to Moore's history? As simon said, he's not very bright.

Why do you think the conviction will be overturned? As I understand it that can only happen if the evidence at the original trial turns out to be flawed.

<<Sigh>> poor people of Harlepool. Didn't they once hang a monkey? They're going to take a lot more jibing over this. Feel sorry for the supporters to be honest.

A MISTAKE???? Oh well in that case, let's leave him alone to get on with his life. His victim will understand - MISTAKES happen

WTAF

I reckon the monkey wants no part of this.

i don't even know who 'Moore' is
Just really that he seems to have a lot of support, and that he has got an appeal date so soon, when , in the normal way of things it would not be til 2017

He has to have grounds to appeal though, he can't just appeal on the basis he does not like the verdict, or that he has a lot of support. The appeals process should not take account of public opinion either way, it should be based on the law. He has had one appeal turned down. What has changed since then?

He's been refused leave to appeal twice hasn't he? Could be wrong there. The current process is to decide finally whether he is allowed to appeal or not. So the idea that he has an appeal case pending is incorrect - he is waiting to find out whether he is allowed to appeal. Unless things have changed but I'd have thought the outcome of the current process would be in the news and I haven't seen anything.

Basically this Moore chap is factually incorrect on about 3 counts in as many sentences.

I thought he'd been refused leave to appeal just the once, and was seeking a second go.

Am I right in thinking that to be granted leave to appeal, you need to demonstrate either a technical legal issue that needs to be resolved, or new evidence that could not have been brought to the original trial. What you can't do is keep going back and presenting the same evidence in slightly different ways, in the hope of a different verdict.

Hartlepool FC is league 2 (or division 4 in oldspeak). Which I think tends to show that the idea there woukd be decent clubs queuing up to sign a convicted rapist was very much misplaced.

Quote from Moore; "He is a proven scorer; he's served his time and the boy wants to play football."

Awww didums.

Oh, and Hartlepool FC are bottom of League 2 at the moment, and facing relegation from league football.

That might make a manager with a murky past (Moore was sacked froma a previous club for breach of FA betting rules) interested in buying anyone who might score a few goals.

I think that's right aunty they need to have new evidence etc you can't just appeal on the same bunch of stuff.

And, according to the BBC website, Moore was only named Hartlepool manager 4 days ago.

I wonder how long he'll last there? They've been through quite a few managers recently, and this now looks like another duff choice.