...or two patients making the same complaint?
I've recently complained to the GMC about a surgeon, a family friend, who saw me as a favour in my home for an extremely painful condition. He took a hand-written medical history, examined me, read reports by other doctors and agreed with another consultant who suggested administering a guided injection. He was willing to administer this. However, at the end of the consultation he stated firmly that Jesus Christ was the true healer and he treated 'the whole person'. I had no option but to consent. At least four long and gruelling consultations followed during which I was questioned in exhaustive detail about every area of my life from early childhood. Written homework was required. It was unbelievably invasive. My husband and I became very concerned about the lack of treatment but persisted because the doctor was 100% confident that his treatment would produce a cure. We thought it was cracked but we had nothing to lose. He talked frequently about a multi-staged treatment programme and planned to administer a guided injection at the 'right moment'.
During the last consultation, the doctor grew very adversarial and announced that I was in 'torment' because I was guilty of 'sinful thoughts and feelings from early childhood'. He 'requested' that I approach a close family member and ask them for forgiveness. This would produce a 'miraculous change such as I could not now imagine' to the point that an injection would be very successful. I withdrew from all this and made my complaint to the GMC.
Now it seems that the doctor has responded to my complaint by telling the GMC that he never saw me as a patient, offered no treatment and 'does not recognise' the descriptions of his words or manner. He says he never carried out an examination, other than that I 'pointed to where I felt pain'. (The truth is, he had me lie across the sofa and perform movements while he prodded and poked my very sore pelvis.) He adds that the complaint is the writing of a 'girl with huge literary ability but unfortunately a long psychiatric history from childhood which he knew of before he agreed to see me.'
I've suffered from depression in the past but no delusions, psychosis, or issues around truth-telling. I was never referred to a child psychiatrist although I did suffer from panic attacks as a teenager.
I'm now thinking that this may all be for nothing. Is a doctor able to get away with anything provided there is no one else in the room and the patient has at some point been prescribed antidepressants?
My husband was present a lot of the time and heard most of what was said, but he won't be considered impartial, will he? Given that the doctor has lied already, it seems unlikely that the hand-written notes will be handed over to the panel.
Please or to access all these features
Please
or
to access all these features
AIBU?
to think that a complaint against a doctor can't succeed unless there are independent witnesses?
29 replies
wouldbemedic · 13/04/2014 16:48
OP posts:
quietlysuggests ·
13/04/2014 16:52
This reply has been deleted
Message withdrawn at poster's request.
quietlysuggests ·
13/04/2014 19:52
This reply has been deleted
Message withdrawn at poster's request.
spindlyspindler ·
13/04/2014 20:04
This reply has been deleted
Message withdrawn at poster's request.
Don’t want to miss threads like this?
Weekly
Sign up to our weekly round up and get all the best threads sent straight to your inbox!
Log in to update your newsletter preferences.
You've subscribed!
Please create an account
To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.