My feed
Premium

Please
or
to access all these features

AIBU?

to say did you see this story about the council building a 10 storey ramp for disabled access to a house?

59 replies

livelablove · 14/02/2014 17:52

This is a mad one, what were they thinking? picture

OP posts:
Report
ISeeYouShiverWithAntici · 14/02/2014 17:55

I saw that. It seemed really odd. Why choose to do it like that ? Thats like climbing up a mountain! How steep is the garden to justify that monstrosity?

Report
Sidge · 14/02/2014 17:55

Crikey that's an eyesore.

Mind you I'm not sure how else they could have done it, it's quite a slope and would have been hard to have to push a wheelchair up a steeper ramp.

Report
DonnaDishwater · 14/02/2014 17:57

They should have just moved them into a different home.

Report
bazingasheldon · 14/02/2014 17:57

WTF?

Report
Mintyy · 14/02/2014 17:57

Why is this in aibu?

It is a news article so could go in In The News or Chat.

Why don't hq just rename the whole site Am I Being Unreasonable and have done with it?

Report
thedogwakesuptoodamnearly · 14/02/2014 18:08

It's a steep garden, it meets building regs. What else were the council supposed to do?

Report
ISeeYouShiverWithAntici · 14/02/2014 18:10

Grin mintyy.
Used to annoy me too until I renamed aibu 'Chat 2" in my head. Now i see it as just general chatter about anything, it doesnt bother me.

Report
HoratiaDrelincourt · 14/02/2014 18:12

The family had said they were quite happy as it was and could manage the few steps as they had before. But the council had had to put the ramp in because of the daughter's perceived needs, and because of the slope of the garden it had to be a ludicrous zigzag.

I'm all for H&S regs in general but automatic compliance without discretion is ... disappointing.

Report
ISeeYouShiverWithAntici · 14/02/2014 18:12

Its not THAT steep! Ive been in buildings on more of a slope than that with nothingnlike that ramp.

for me, the point is nobody stopped to think is this a sensible thing.

regardless regulations and paperwork, is it SENSIBLE? If not, what is a more appropriate solution.

Report
frogslegs35 · 14/02/2014 18:13

It's frigging ridiculous!

It seems like a bloody punishment, not something to make your life easier.

Report
RevoltInParadise · 14/02/2014 18:16

The lady was fighting for it for two years. In my head I was thinking the council have gone "fine! You want a ramp. We will give you a fucking ramp!!! Take that!!!
"

Report
ifyourehoppyandyouknowit · 14/02/2014 18:18

It says they needed better access, council are obligated to make changes in line with building regs. Not really seeing how else they could have done it without breaking regulations.

Report
wonkylegs · 14/02/2014 18:24

I work as an accessibility consultant as part of my job and I can see the argument from both sides.
The Council - have to install a ramp with the correct & safe gradients to meet building regulations & to actually enable their use. Too steep and they are useless. They cannot fudge the rules. So they looked at the height they needed to cover, appropriate resting points and calculated what they needed as per their standard spec. This would have been done by a guy who just does ramps. What they didn't apply was any common sense.
What this house needed was a bit of lateral thinking. It is a very big step change in height to accommodate.
If it had been presented to me I would have looked at all the options from moving house to using a platform lift, a more attractive path or a combination. We would have looked at various options and costed them with the council and then the family.
Councils however rarely have the money to employ someone like me, which is a shame as we would probably save them money overall.

Report
WhereDoAllTheCalculatorsGo · 14/02/2014 18:25

Yeah, wheelchair ramps have to be shallower than a 'direct to the door' ramp would have been. A clear case of be-careful-what-you-wish-for.

Report
Ubik1 · 14/02/2014 18:27

My mum's next door neighbour has a sort of chair lift thingy, which works for her.

that ramp comes across as a bit passive aggressive

Report
Hoppinggreen · 14/02/2014 18:35

Apparently all the local kids are using it as a skateboard ramp!!!

Report
softlysoftly · 14/02/2014 18:39

It might be building regs but it doesn't show any common sense and I think its a bit unfair on the little girl. Its like screaming "LOOK SHES DISABLED" at her every time they look out of the window :(

Report
livelablove · 14/02/2014 18:39

YY it is a PA ramp Grin

OP posts:
Report
AfricanExport · 14/02/2014 18:44

I agree with Revolt.

I think this was a case of a council numpty thinking 'You want a fucking ramp. We'll give you one!'

It is kind of becoming the accepted norm that councils are full of numpties with zero common sense?, isn't it?

Report
JazzAnnNonMouse · 14/02/2014 18:54

It's stupid - rehousing would've been a better option.

It wouldn't have cost them them that much more to build a bungalow! Then they'd have been able to house another family and would have two houses in the long run... Common sense that councils lack.

Pa ramp indeed!

Report
GinOnTwoWheels · 14/02/2014 19:15

Is all that fencing really necessary?

Some of the houses where I live have a really massive wheel chair lift in the front garden, not sure if that is any better aesthetically.

I suppose the obvious solution would be to move the family somewhere more suited to their needs, but they may not want the change in area, disruption, need to redecorate and settle in etc.

Report
AndHarry · 14/02/2014 19:21

Woa! It looks like a queuing system at Alton Towers! What a ridiculous thing to do.

A house further down the road from me has an outdoor lift. Much more sensible.

Report

Don’t want to miss threads like this?

Weekly

Sign up to our weekly round up and get all the best threads sent straight to your inbox!

Log in to update your newsletter preferences.

You've subscribed!

MrsDeVere · 14/02/2014 19:28

This reply has been deleted

Message withdrawn at poster's request.

LessMissAbs · 14/02/2014 20:15

wonkylegs What they didn't apply was any common sense.
What this house needed was a bit of lateral thinking. It is a very big step change in height to accommodate. Councils however rarely have the money to employ someone like me, which is a shame as we would probably save them money overall


Its a pity that the council employees, whose job it was to comply, weren't able to do so and to apply for a one-off exemption on reasonable practicability grounds from their own Building Regulation Enforcement Department. A definite lack of imagination shown there.

Its also unrealistic to think that there are lots of council houses available in hilly Dumbartonshire in the west of Scotland that would not pose similar problems.

Report
MummyDuckAndDuckling · 14/02/2014 20:49

I live not far from this family (same council) and tbh, not many council houses around here that are on 'flat' ground so I think the council done what they needed to do and build a ramp.
Surly the parents would have seen some sort of design plans before this was built, if she had this attitude then why did she allow it to be completed?

The council get a lot of slack from residents here. They all seem to have far to much time on their hands to moan about anything and everything! Hmm
I personally find them very helpful

Report
Please create an account

To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.