AIBU to think that it is outrageous even to think that universities should be able to segregate men and women(193 Posts)
Sorry for the long title.
Link to BBC article
For once, I agree with Cameron.
see my post ealier about FGM, it is the same and must be challenged
Well, sure, but to do that, you have to acknowledge they exist. Of course, the bloody shambles we're having now, where they actually believed a guy when he said his freedom of speech required that he be able to give his audience seating instructions, implies that nuanced decisions about consequences are beyond them. Fortunately, as far as lectures are concerned, AFAIK, the status quo of "sit where you like and pay attention" has continued. At least, I hope it has, because if it hasn't, it will be hard to shift back.
By the way, it isn't just male Muslims telling females off. Like any patriarchy, a lot of the warders are women, and in this case they're making their opinions clear about what counts as modest dress and "un-Islamic" behaviour to their more moderate sisters.
I hope that the majority of these radical teenagers at uni will grow out of it quickly.
> But please acknowledge that in the process, you would lose some students. Some who might wish to continue studying, but feel it was culturally unacceptable to do so.
So, continue to address and challenge the reasons behind this until the non-privileged group feels comfortable, instead of taking the short-cut of letting the religous extremists call the tune.
Let me try this again.
And if this had happened to be a remotely important academic lecture, and people were self-segregating, do you think forbidding segregated seating would necessarily have furthered the cause of female education and emancipation for all?
It's fine to have principles. It's fine to say, "no, we will not condone this, and allow this practice to be seen as acceptable to this prestigious institution" or some such. But please acknowledge that in the process, you would lose some students. Some who might wish to continue studying, but feel it was culturally unacceptable to do so.
Mixed spaces are only mixed when both/all groups feel equally able to go in them. If you're not starting from a good position, you get a space when the privileged group go in freely and the non-privileged group(s) is nominally allowed in, but doesn't. And people say, "but they could if they wanted, they just don't want to" and refuse to deal with the underlying issues.
The answer is not for women to be segregated obediently so they can be considered "proper muslims" by anyone who happens to be male.
In the same way as women should not have to watch what they wear, in case a man disapproves or worse.
ubik1 Well, if you think so... I was thinking that I should remain cynical, and not leap to the conclusion that men sitting in the women's area are necessarily wonderful feminists.
LoveSewingBee Would I be right in thinking you're not a young muslim woman, who either comes from a very traditional family, or a young muslim woman who, whatever the strength of her own beliefs, feels surrounded by extremist peers who constantly seem to be searching for reasons to call others "not proper muslims"?
If so, that might be why you've never felt you faced a risk of social ostracism, and your little emoticon is a little bit smug.
"there's even an undercurrent of "women get back in the house". And I don't want to end up supporting the latter"
Well if you suspect that that is what the men were intending, that they were implying the women shouldn't be there at all, then I suppose you should support segregation in these talks with all your might. You must join the women at the back of the hall. You must write your questions on bits of paper rather than speak.
I have never felt ostracised when I sat next to men who were not related to me.
They are not 'enforcing' mixed seating
They are saying they will not accommodate special requests for gender segregated seating on religious grounds
Let's imagine some educational facility enforces mixed seating. Suppose a hefty contingent of students came from a culture which believed is sex segregation. But, like many such cultures, rebellion against sex segregation was treated differently based on whether you were male or female.
Perhaps men sitting next to unrelated women who aren't your wife is a bit iffy, but you won't be ostracised for it. But a woman sitting next to a man who is not her brother or husband? She gets socially ostracised.
Does the mixed seating promote gender inclusion? Or does it exclude women who aren't in a position to say "fuck you" to their peers?
There is no place for segregation in our universities for lectures and anything to do with learning imo. I have not so much of a problem if the speaker is there for religious purposes or clubs or support groups.
erm.. you honestly think anyone here is blaming the women sitting there?
Are we talking about a university? There's a vigorous argument about that going on up thread. More importantly to me though, I see a load of individuals with religious beliefs. I do not share those beliefs, but I think that both men and women are allowed to keep away from the opposite sex, of their own free will, if it doesn't impact on anyone else.
Now there's potential for an argument that perhaps the mixed space was unused, because it wasn't a socially accepted choice, and maybe the men even discussed with the women they sat next to beforehand, as part of a coordinated protest, because they knew none of the women dared to sit in that mixed space, due to unequal social pressures. It is possible.
It is also possible that we're seeing men invading women's personal space on a flimsy pretext, and that there's even an undercurrent of "women get back in the house". And I don't want to end up supporting the latter.
There is a massive difference between a university and a religious institution.
>To this day monasteries and convents discriminate on your sex as part of their beliefs as religious organisations. Do we have a problem with that, or just muslim women sitting away from men?
what religious groups choose to do on their own turf isn't what we're discussing here. Muslims and orthodox Jews can segregate their places of worship, same thing with nuns/monks. The issue is with a public meeting on university property.
How did the organisers know that the men 'in the wrong seats' were men at all?
There's a big difference between a religious organisation and a university, isn't there?
To this day monasteries and convents discriminate on your sex as part of their beliefs as religious organisations. Do we have a problem with that, or just muslim women sitting away from men?
maybe we could mixed seats, male seats, female seats and trans-gender seats in the middle...but where would you put the buggies....
Maybe on buses we can have black seats, white seats and mixed seats. That will keep everyone happy then.
From your link "It is understood that Chambers did not present any inflammatory views last night."
I repeat, you claimed that speakers are currently inciting violence on campus. You have yet to provide any evidence of this.
The men were protesting against segregated seating. They have the perfect right to sit next a woman, in any section at all. It might appear rude, it may even be intimidating, but they were right to do it. Men and women sitting together is an unremarkable activity. I sit next to men all the time. I have not yet turned into a frog.
Carol - Google is a marvellous thing: www.hamzatzortzis.com/clarifications-and-responses/
Back - I think the ultimate responsibility lies with the organisation booking the speaker. I'm sure ISOC's will have different attitudes towards segregation. For the record, ISOC's are democratically elected orgs, so members of each branch have a lot of say in the direction of the ISOC.
For some, particularly those who focus a lot on outreach to non-Muslims and don't generally run segregated events, it wouldn't be an issue they would want to deal with, so they just wouldn't invite the speaker.
For those who do run events, generally aimed at Muslims, which are generally segregated, the speaker is just wanting what they would do anyway, so I can see why they would think it wouldn't be a problem, it would be seen as a club event for members of that club, which is run in a way club members like it.
I understand this analogy won't please some, but to Muslims who view segregation just as good manners and the way we do things, having a segregated meeting is no different to having a halal food at a meeting. It's just how things are done.
Also, have you forgotten the Gina Ford case on here?
As I say: if you think that what I've said is potentially actionable, you know how to report it to MNHQ. Do so. They've got skilled libel lawyers and a firm understanding of the law.
In terms of a concrete example of preachers with foul views on homosexuality and the kuffr being hosted by campus ISOCs, I give you theyorker.co.uk/news/campus/11677-anger-as-extremist-islamic-speaker. In the twelve months since those robust descriptions of the speaker legal action has not been forthcoming, by the way.
Join the discussion
Registering is free, easy, and means you can join in the discussion, get discounts, win prizes and lots more.Register now
Already registered with Mumsnet? Log in to leave your comment or alternatively, sign in with Facebook or Google.
Please login first.