Skip to main content
Skip to main navigation
Skip to talk navigation

Active discussions

Please or to access all these features

Add post

Watch this thread

Save thread

Start a new thread

Flip thread

Hide thread

My feed

Saved Active Unanswered threads

Getting started FAQ's

Unanswered threads Acronyms Talk guidelines

Hide shortcut buttons

Talk

Flip

AIBU?

to be saddened by friends reaction to a tv show?

23 replies

MaryJayneHeart · 25/08/2013 23:44

I was having a Mad Men marathon, and told my friend that I found one storyline upsetting that a woman had just been given a promotion and then suddenly gone into labour (she had no idea she was pregnant) and then giving her baby away, she couldn't even bring herself to hold him. And further episodes down the line you can see that of course it has had an effect on her.

My friend did this and said "That's disgusting, I would never give my baby away"

It make me sad that although it's a tv show I'm sure this situation was common, she was a single woman working in a very male dominated environment in the 70s.

She would have been branded a whore by most people, lost her job, wouldn't be able to support her baby, could lose friends and family, the father was a married man who would have denied the child was his.

I just found her reaction to be quite harsh. Aibu?

OP posts:

Report

cory · 25/08/2013 23:48

Excuse me, but you are talking about the 1870's here, aren't you?

I am old enough to have been around in the 1970's and I can assure you that women were not branded whores for having an extra-marital baby. And that there were plenty of working single mothers.

Jan49 · 25/08/2013 23:48

I think your friend's reaction was harsh but why on earth did you say the pg woman would be "branded a whore" by most people??????? You're talking about the 1970s not the 1900's. It really wasn't that bad.

NadiaWadia · 26/08/2013 00:00

If you mean when Peggy had Pete's baby (and didn't even realise she was pregnant) than I'm sure this was supposed to be happening in the early/mid 60s, not 70s, so probably a bit more conservative then.

squoosh · 26/08/2013 00:04

It was the early 60s.

NadiaWadia · 26/08/2013 00:05

And women pregnant and unmarried would normally be expected to give the babies up for adoption, I remember the actress Pauline Collins wrote her memoir 'Letter to Louise' about her own experience of giving up her baby in the early 60s. She found it very upsetting, but it was just expected as the norm, and she thought she was doing the right thing, so that her daughter could have a 'proper family'.

Also, I have an idea it might not have been possible to get any help from the state as a single parent, maybe not even council accommodation. And of course that would be even more so in the US.

SaucyJack · 26/08/2013 00:07

YABU.

She's entitled to have strong feelings against having her own (imaginary 1970s unplanned pg) child adopted.

Part of being pro choice regarding conception/pregnancy/adoption means respecting every other woman's right to make her own decisions based on her individual values.

And yes, get a real world life!

AnyCraic · 26/08/2013 00:10

Depends on the country. In 70s (and early - mid 80s) Ireland many women were still giving babies up for adoption as they were unmarried. Most didn't want to but felt they didn't have a choice as they would bring shame on their families.

Either way your friend is BU as attitudes in society were v different back then whenever then was so she can't really say what she would or would not have dine

AnyCraic · 26/08/2013 00:10

*done

NadiaWadia · 26/08/2013 00:14

Your friend has not much awareness of different attitudes in different times and places. Maybe she's not too bright? But nothing for you to be particularly sad about, really.

NynaevesSister · 26/08/2013 05:12

I hate it when people make blanket statements like that. It isn't like we all walk around with badges on identifying the worst life events we've gone through. There are lots of reasons women have to give up their kids for adoption. How was she to know the person she was talking to hadn't been down a similar path? She doesn't sound very empathic. Nothing is ever that black and white.

Tee2072 · 26/08/2013 05:55

It's a TV show. You and she are both upset over something that didn't even actually happen!

christinarossetti · 26/08/2013 06:00

The first episodes of Mad Men are set in the very late 1950s, I believe.

PolterGoose · 26/08/2013 09:00

This reply has been deleted

Message withdrawn at poster's request.

GhostsInSnow · 26/08/2013 10:47

Polter, you are given the impression that the baby with her mother is hers but as the seasons progress you are told that he isn't her child he's her sisters boy and she did indeed put her son up for adoption.

It was also first season which covers mid to late fifties. Even in the last season they hadn't reached the seventies!

littlemog · 26/08/2013 10:51

Amazed that you are 'sad' about this. And that you don't even know the time period when the tv show's events were set.

I was given up for adoption by a single mother in 1970 and had I encountered your friend's reaction I would not have felt 'sad'. It's an opinion that's all and she is entitled to it. Big deal.

It's a tv show - not real.

YalleyoftheDolls87 · 26/08/2013 10:52

Great spoiler alerts

WafflyVersatile · 26/08/2013 10:57

Maybe your friend hasn't spent a lot of time considering the full context of the fictional programme you've been watching and just made her gut reaction to the thought of giving away a child. I could never countenance giving my child away is hardly an unusual opinion today.

I'm not really sure that your friend at 2nd hand is not showing much sympathy with a fictional character's moral dilema from a show she hasn't been watching and has no investment in is something to be so saddened about.

Sparklysilversequins · 26/08/2013 10:58

Seeing as that series is six years old, maybe people would assume that most people who wanted to would have seen it Yalley?

YalleyoftheDolls87 · 26/08/2013 11:00

Well I was 13 then Sparkly so it wasn't my kind of thing at the time.

And it's still running. Not everyone watches something right from thr very first episode of when it was first aired.

Bloody hell excuse me for breathing.

Sparklysilversequins · 26/08/2013 11:05

Are you watching the current run then? It's on Atlantic every night, up till Season three at the moment if you're interested.

Silverfoxballs · 26/08/2013 11:15

This reply has been deleted

Message withdrawn at poster's request.

TroublesomeEx · 26/08/2013 13:52

I wouldn't say this, but I do tend to put a pretty swift end to any conversation that involves talking about a TV programme as though it's important.

It might have been a conversation that was uncomfortable to her for personal reasons and she might have just wanted to end the conversation as quickly as possible.

My son was born in 1998 and I was a single parent. I was 24 and my fiance was sleeping with someone else. I moved back in with my mother very briefly and she found the modern day equivalent of these homes for unmarried mothers to 'put me into'. I would very much avoid a conversation of this nature because I find it very difficult to answer questions about my son's early life without either lying or it bringing up unpleasant memories.

Don’t want to miss threads like this?

Weekly

Sign up to our weekly round up and get all the best threads sent straight to your inbox!

Email address

Log in to update your newsletter preferences.

You've subscribed!

BrokenSunglasses · 26/08/2013 14:40

Not sure what you are sad about. Be happy that times have changed!

I think it's ok to feel strongly that you could never give your baby away. It's instinct for most mothers to want to protect their babies and keep them close, we are just lucky that we no longer have to think about going against those instincts because the consequences of following them won't ruin the rest of our lives.

Flip

Please create an account

To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.