Skip to main content
Skip to main navigation
Skip to talk navigation

Active discussions

Please or to access all these features

Add post

Watch this thread

Save thread

Start a new thread

Flip thread

Hide thread

My feed

Saved Active Unanswered threads

Getting started FAQ's

Unanswered threads Acronyms Talk guidelines

Hide shortcut buttons

Talk

Flip

1 2

AIBU?

To think Virgina Wade should say 'Oi! Do you mind?'

47 replies

squoosh · 07/07/2013 17:51

Firstly, huge congratulations to Andy Murray!

But if I was Virginia Wade I'd be mightily hacked off at all this 'first British winner of Wimbledon in 77 years' malarkey. Come on Sue!

How insulting to Virginia.

(I realise Virginia has most likely never said 'Oi!' to anyone)

OP posts:

Report

LastTangoInDevonshire · 07/07/2013 17:56

Agree (they did quantify it earlier by saying the first British player to have won wearing SHORTS !!)

SueDoku · 07/07/2013 19:36

Think they were comparing him to Fred Perry - who wore long trousers when he won; nothing to do with the fact that he's NOT the first British winner etc.... . Oh and I'd rather Virginia let us do the speaking - her voice has the same effect on me as fingernails down a blackboard...

Kiriwawa · 07/07/2013 19:48

YANBU - it's so fucking sexist, like a woman winning is worth about a tenth of a MAN winning.

And it was really difficult explaining it to my DS 'no he isn't the first British winner since 1936, he's the first man to have won'

'so why are they saying he's the first?'

'because bbc radio 4 is populated by old sexist men' is probably the right answer

EeyoreIsh · 07/07/2013 20:00

It really angers me too! Bloody sexist media.

currentbuns · 07/07/2013 20:10

Yes - there is definitely that underlying sense that it is only the men's championship that really 'counts' , and that the women's contest is somehow secondary and comparatively inconsequential.

AuntieStella · 07/07/2013 20:12

And of course the doubles...

DoctorAnge · 07/07/2013 20:13

completely agree!!!!!

flippinada · 07/07/2013 20:14

Yes agree and well said. It's brilliant AM has won but it's not just about the mens singles is it?

SmiteYouWithThunderbolts · 07/07/2013 20:15

Agreed. DH has already had a rant this afternoon about the women's final taking place a whole day before the men's, suggesting it's just an opening act for the main event.

Edinbugger · 07/07/2013 20:15

Yanbu. I'm a bit gobsmacked by this tbh. Really, really disappointing reportage.

ukatlast · 07/07/2013 20:39

For goodness sake - it is obvious they are referring to the Men's Singles Event - and Virginia's win was also a long time ago....there will be equal delight the next time a Brit wins the Ladies Singles, you can be sure of that.

This kind of whingey thread just gives feminisim a bad name tbh.

squoosh · 07/07/2013 20:43

'This kind of whingey thread just gives feminisim a bad name tbh.'

Wow, it's been hours since someone has rolled out that line.

Feminism doesn't have a bad name as far as I'm concerned!

OP posts:

amothersplaceisinthewrong · 07/07/2013 20:43

Didn't John Lloyd win a Wimbledon Title in about 1978 (the Mixed Doubles)!

cardibach · 07/07/2013 20:44

I have heard several commentators and it has been very clear that they are talking about the Men's Singles. I don't see any reason for frothing about it either, ukatlast.
There are good reasons to think it is all a bit sexist - timing, relative prize money etc., but this isn't one of them!

flippinada · 07/07/2013 20:50

"Feminism doesn't have a bad name as far as I'm concerned!"

I hear you squoosh

Wabbitty · 07/07/2013 20:52

Laura Robson has won the juniors, and Jamie Murray has won the mixed doubles so there have been even more recent winners than the ones previously mentioned.

However it WAS said in the context of mens singles.

BasilBabyEater · 07/07/2013 20:53

Feminism will always have a bad name as long as we live in a patriarchy.

If it doesn't have a bad name, it's not doing its job.

OP, yabu to expect Virginia Wade's achievement to be ranked alongside that of someone with a Y chromosome. Doncha know we live in a patriarchy?

flippinada · 07/07/2013 20:53

Fail to see what's whingey about the thread - it's an observation.

somethingscary · 07/07/2013 20:55

Equal prize money for best of 3 sets vs 5 seems quite equal to me

ilovesooty · 07/07/2013 21:09

Ann Jones won the women's singles a few years before Virginia Wade. Yes, there have been some mixed doubles titles since. I think it was quite clear in the context of the commentary that it was the men's title being referred to.

ilovesooty · 07/07/2013 21:11

OP, yabu to expect Virginia Wade's achievement to be ranked alongside that of someone with a Y chromosome. Doncha know we live in a patriarchy?

I don't happen to think Virginia Wade's achievement can be ranked alongside Murray's, FWIW.

sis · 07/07/2013 21:13

Sue should know better since it was Sue Barker that Virginia Wade beat in the final in 1977!

Don’t want to miss threads like this?

Weekly

Sign up to our weekly round up and get all the best threads sent straight to your inbox!

Email address

Log in to update your newsletter preferences.

You've subscribed!

TheFallenMadonna · 07/07/2013 21:17

She best Betty Stove in the final. There should be some kind of accent there too I think, but not sure where...

stayathomegardener · 07/07/2013 21:18

Well being objective from the commentary I heard I had no idea there had been any British winners since 1936

ilovesooty · 07/07/2013 21:18

Yes, it was Betty Stove. It doesn't have an accent.

Flip

1 2

Please create an account

To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.