To think babies aren't 'happy with anyone in the early months'(29 Posts)
I constantly hear/see people saying 'Oh all babies are fine being left with anyone as long as they're warm and fed until about 6 months' etc. I have never found this.
Even as a premature baby in nicu , EDs heart monitor would raise when someone else held her, once home she would cry if put down or handed to someone else from day 1. After about 2 months home, she would go for cuddles for a few minutes, then become inconsolable, and now at 9 months, she will go down for longer periods, and sit by other people, but if anyone she doesn't know well picks her up she will scream.
I just don't understand the assumption that babies are clueless about their parents until they're older. And I especially don't understand the 'You're being PFB if you don't leave DC to be babysat as they will be fine' type comments.
Much in this.
But I also think people tend to overlook that babies are often unhappy with their own mothers in the early months- and nobody blames it on them being with the mother. But if the dad/grandma looks after the baby and baby is unhappy it is immediately assumed that it is because dad/grandma shouldn't be doing it.
Dd used to howl with me. A lot. But nobody ever suggested it was because I was her mum so shouldn't be looking after her.
Ds's sats were always low when he was in SCBU until I picked him up and then they stayed at 100
I've read that babies don't even realise they're separate from you until they're about four months it's must be confusing for them if they're passed around a lot
i've not really heard this, most who've said something have said the opposite, 'dc just want their mum' type comments.
we did have a couple of friends, with no kids, who were genuinely surprised we couldn't travel to the other end of the country and leave 3mo bf'd ds with a babysitter for 2 nights to attend their child free wedding
I guess it depends. DS was FF as my milk didn't come in, so he never got used to snuggling up to me for feeds etc, and he was quite happy to be pushed from pillar to post. This was great in one respect as I had crippling PND and would have given him to passing gypsies if I hadn't been able to take regular breaks from him.
I don't think there's a one size fits all when it comes to baby psychology. For the record, DS at 16 months is a complete and total mama's boy.
Based on my sample of two , I completely agree. I don't think they're like parcels that can be passed around, I believe they're deeply complex little creatures and there's a whole world of stuff going on with them that we just can't see.
i dont think babies are 'happy with anyone'
but i do think they benefit from spending short periods of time away from mum to bond with other relatives
DD1 was under phototherapy lights for jaundice when she was 2 days old, surrounded by bits of plastic that she kept bashing into, and was so so unhappy unless I spoke to her. when she heard my voice she calmed down, no one elses, just mine.
She had been a part of my body a few hours before, of course she needed me near her.
Not sure really. But never wanted to leave my 4 because I didn't want to. They weren't passed around or babysat much.
I assume though they would have survived if I had needed/wanted to.
I think it depends on the child maybe?
We had family babysit DS when he was a month old, he honestly was not bothered.
I don't think that means you can leave a baby with anyone, but a doting grandparent who will give lots of cuddles and fuss over them constantly seemed to work pretty well
He was indeed more bothered by us leaving when he was older.
So I think YANBU in that it doesn't apply to everyone, but that doesn't mean the people saying it are necessarily wrong, because it is true for some.
My DD is 13 weeks and she'll go to anyone, though she'll sit there and look at me.
I think it depends to a great extent on who the baby bonds with in those early weeks. Dh and I were equally hands on, so our babies seemed happy with either of us. But I have known families where the baby is snatched back to mum from dad the moment it so much as grizzles, yet when it grizzles with mum it still stays with mum- no cries of "aw, he wants his daddy".
I think that it is better for the New Mum to have on-going contact with her baby, than it is for the baby, in terms of bonding. It is important to make any New Mum feel as though she is essential to her baby, having as much contact as possible. However studies show that from the baby's POV bonding happens later and as long as Mum is happy, then the baby will have no ill effects from being given to trusted care givers, to give her a break. Studies have been done with baby's who are in Foster Care and as long as they are in a permanent home by 12 months, ideally a little sooner, there is no attachment issues, some children up to around 2 1/2 show no issues.
I totally agree.
DD was happiest with me (because i provided the milk) and with DH (because he provided the sleep and clean bum)
Ds was mostly happy with anyone who wasn't me when he was very young.
I think it depends. If they're bf they will be happiest with mum in the early days as will probably want to feed/ comfort suck 1-2 times an hour. That was the only thing that settled my dd so I would end up feeding her on and off all day.
If you are ff it probably doesn't matter so much as anyone can give them a bottle and they will find other ways to comfort themselves.
I think it really does depend on the baby, that's too sweeping a statement.
We also had a NICU baby, but I think she went the other way and was happy with anyone because of it. She was also ff equally by me and DP. When she was very young she really didn't care who held her, as long as they were warm and had a heartbeat she could snuggle up to!
Every baby has their own personality, so I think YABU to say that all babies are like yours.
Babies are all different.
Sometimes DS2 would settle for anyone but me, I think it's was because I smelled of milk so he wanted to feed but he was full and needed to sleep, as soon as someone else picked him up he fell asleep.
Actually agree with thurlow as dd was also in SCBU but ff and went to anyone. Ds cries even with me
Saying 'all babies' is as silly as saying 'all women'. They are all different. Some will be fine with anyone and some won't. Some women are happy to hand their baby to others and some are not.
DC1 - bottle fed ebm. Happy to go to anyone. But was happiest with me. Has been a total mummies boy, but very confident and friendly with others since day 1. But mummy is the special one . Could be left over night with family from about 18 months, but didn't until 2yrs.
Dc1 - breastfed, no bottles at all. Was practicality glued to me for the first 6 months. Could not be put down ever. Howled if anyone else held her and also every time I left the room. She is now 2.8yrs, still bf, much more confident around others (family), although would not tolerate strangers. Very happy at nursery though bizarrely.
I would leave her overnight with family but not a random babysitter.
YABU. Mine did nothing but sleep for the first couple of months. He literally woke up long enough to feed and have his nappy changed, then was off to sleep again. As long as he was clean, warm, and food appeared when he woke up for it, I really don't think he was bothered who was providing it! As several people have said, babies are not all the same.
DD was/ is happy with anyone.
Why generalise though?
Join the discussion
Registering is free, easy, and means you can join in the discussion, watch threads, get discounts, win prizes and lots more.Register now »
Already registered? Log in with:
Please login first.