Advanced search

to think that the new national curriculum proposals seem to have passed people by when actually the consequences could be terrible?

(83 Posts)
soverylucky Sat 09-Feb-13 12:52:31

Message withdrawn at poster's request.

Tee2072 Sat 09-Feb-13 12:53:57

Details? Link? Is it a secret?

soverylucky Sat 09-Feb-13 13:06:07

Message withdrawn at poster's request.

scrappydappydoo Sat 09-Feb-13 13:08:49

Ok - help me out - that document is over 200 pages long and I'm not a teacher - broadly what are the big issues?

Tee2072 Sat 09-Feb-13 13:09:20

Okay, the reason no one is commenting is because it is 221 pages. Also, it's for England.

Not everyone lives in England.

Can you sum up what worries you?

aamia Sat 09-Feb-13 13:14:05

Will read it but it might take a while lol. What I want to know is WHY, when we're a country so in need of saving money, more of that money is being spent on overhauling something like this? Surely the one we had was good enough for now??!!!

soverylucky Sat 09-Feb-13 13:17:43

Message withdrawn at poster's request.

Eebahgum Sat 09-Feb-13 13:19:50

I reckon they made it that long on purpose so no one can feasibly read it & it will get passed without opposition. Without even reading it i can imagine the kind of crap Gove is going to force us to deliver in schools. What are the issues that concern you? X

WhichIsBest Sat 09-Feb-13 13:21:54

I was linked to it before but at 200 odd pages didn't have time to go through it.

kim147 Sat 09-Feb-13 13:47:40

Message withdrawn at poster's request.

gordyslovesheep Sat 09-Feb-13 13:56:15

OP please tell us why - even if it's just your subject - if people don't know YOU need to explain

MadamFolly Sat 09-Feb-13 14:08:56

There is a big big emphasis on England in KS3 History which will make us neglect some other stuff, thank God my subject is not included in the NC and is planned on a regional basis.

LivingInAPinkBauble Sat 09-Feb-13 16:25:57

Read primary curriculum, seems to change us to a knowledge based curriculum which is what we were asked to move away from! Much more chalk and talk. To me it feels like Gove wants his own school days back. It is much more prescriptive in terms of topics for Science, Hist etc as to what must be taught each year. Not a fan but then anyone who changes schools into academies and says you don't need to be a teacher to teach is an ass!

mrsbunnylove Sat 09-Feb-13 16:32:31

a quick glance suggests my subject is still in there, even if we don't have a section of our own, so i'm happy. still got a job, until monday at least.

soverylucky Sat 09-Feb-13 16:54:42

Message withdrawn at poster's request.

kim147 Sat 09-Feb-13 16:59:37

Message withdrawn at poster's request.

Nanny0gg Sat 09-Feb-13 17:04:26

How do you make it relevant?

The little begger's will love all the death and plague and wars 'n' stuff.

I'd love it, myself.

Catsnotrats Sat 09-Feb-13 17:09:12

Soverylucky I was about to post the same - it's completely bonkers. I'd also point out that I went to a private prep school and we didn't cover a fraction of this (and nor do any private schools that I have come across recently).

Some topics could be quite interesting if taught well, e.g. Normans and the Civil War which aren't on the curriculum at the moment. However I really don't fancy having to interest 9 year olds in de Montfort's parliament.

What is also missing is the lives of everyday people, which is what children find most fascinating as they are able to compare and contrast with their own (particularly any gross/disgusting facts ala horrible histories).

It's also going to mean dropping ww2 which I find interests children the most as it is touchable - the people who were alive then are still here or only a generation away making it so much more interesting.

orangeandlemons Sat 09-Feb-13 17:12:45

I loathe this government more than the words can say. ....But I teach dt, and I'm quite looking forward to teaching horticulture...I love gardening!

I utterly loathe and despise everything else this government and Gove have done.

HollyBerryBush Sat 09-Feb-13 17:13:32

We managed to cover all that when I was at primary school and more.

Mind you what was a 2 year O level syllabus (industrial revolution) is now just a 6 week module for GCSE

Things evolve.

NTitled Sat 09-Feb-13 17:15:10

Interesting. The History list seems v smilar to what my children are being taught in prep schools. Though their schools seem more interested in teaching stuff, rather than making it "fun", "interactive" etc. I know that all the fun stuff has its place, but my DC are at least well informed.

kim147 Sat 09-Feb-13 17:15:40

Message withdrawn at poster's request.

maybeyoushoulddrive Sat 09-Feb-13 17:16:46

Crikey - that's a lot of history to cover in KS2 shock Some fabulous history, but some quite boring fact based stuff that will not interest the average 10 year old at all. How to put off children at a young age IMHO.

RubberBullets Sat 09-Feb-13 17:17:20

Sounds interesting to me. The only history we did in primary was WW2

LeeCoakley Sat 09-Feb-13 17:18:07

I read the History Curriculum as Greek and Roman history compulsory at KS2 and the rest should follow chronologically through KS2 and KS3.

Join the discussion

Join the discussion

Registering is free, easy, and means you can join in the discussion, get discounts, win prizes and lots more.

Register now