Advanced search

to think asylum seekers should not have to film themselves having sex to prove they are gay?

(42 Posts)
kim147 Sun 03-Feb-13 18:40:47

Message withdrawn at poster's request.

JoanByers Sun 03-Feb-13 18:56:37

It doesn't say that they have to film themselves having sex.

AmandaPayne Sun 03-Feb-13 18:58:28

It doesn't say film yourself though does it? Surely you could provide details of current or past relationships, give a narrative of your experience of realising your sexuality?

Booyhoo Sun 03-Feb-13 19:00:45

are straight people having to prove they are straight in the same way gay asylum seekers are being asked to prove they're gay?

TheFallenNinja Sun 03-Feb-13 19:02:31

It doesn't say that and I want a robust, no nonsense, not easily hoodwinked asylum system.

kinkyfuckery Sun 03-Feb-13 19:03:44

Why does it matter what their sexuality is? confused

kim147 Sun 03-Feb-13 19:04:15

Message withdrawn at poster's request.

kim147 Sun 03-Feb-13 19:05:17

Message withdrawn at poster's request.

Loislane78 Sun 03-Feb-13 19:06:12

Presumably because being gay is a death warrant in some countries and that is the reason for some in seeking asylum - hence being asked.

JoanByers Sun 03-Feb-13 19:06:58

The problem is if you live in Uganda or whatever and want to come to the UK (which many people would), then being able to say 'I'm gay, give me asylum', would result in many people claiming this, even if it were not true.

BarbarianMum Sun 03-Feb-13 19:09:00

<<are straight people having to prove they are straight in the same way gay asylum seekers are being asked to prove they're gay? >>

Well no, because being straight is not generally considered a reason to claim asylum.

I don't suppose you need to prove you are gay unless its central to your asylum claim.

TBH its pretty difficult to prove many of the things people claim asylum for - unless you are famous and oppressed, or your torturers leave helpful, visible scarring sad. That's one of the reasons that is not straightforward to have a 'robust, no-nonsense system' that is also fair.

OxfordBags Sun 03-Feb-13 19:10:32

Kinkyfuckery - because some people have to claim asylum because the persecution/death they face in their own country is because they are LGBT.

One of the idiotic rulings they have been using to 'prove' that lesbian asylum seekers are not lesbians, is that they do not possess or use lesbian-pleasing porn - totally overlooking the fact that women don't use as much porn as men, they have come from places where porn is not easily available, and pretty impossible for a woman to get hold of, and that porn is simply not part of the lesbian culture (being underground as it is) in their culture, and above all, that porn usage is not normative or indicative of sexuality in any case.

kim147 Sun 03-Feb-13 19:12:51

Message withdrawn at poster's request.

OxfordBags Sun 03-Feb-13 19:12:54

JoanByers, being homosexual in places like Uganda is such a stigma and such a scary thing to say, even as a joke, that it is incredibly unlikely that hetero Ugandans would claim asylum by pretending to be gay. Not only would they barely dare say it to officials, as to do so in their own country would be signing their death warrant, they would be terrified that the Ugandan community in the UK would find out that this was how they claimed asylum.

LineRunner Sun 03-Feb-13 19:18:36

I helped to fight an asylum case in my town where the asylum seeker did have visible scarring - bullet wounds - and even then the UKBA was planning to send the poor sod back.

He was 16.

TheFallenNinja Sun 03-Feb-13 19:37:22

Oxfordbags makes an excellent point. At what point does in immigrant community apply their values to other immigrants of the same source by persecution of LGBT or whatever else is taboo? Even though we have our own laws to protect, they only actually work after the event.

I guess at some point it must happen?

StuntGirl Sun 03-Feb-13 19:38:09

Aw linerunner that's awful sad Did he get to stay?

LineRunner Sun 03-Feb-13 19:53:18

As far as we know he is still safely here, StuntGirl. A wonderful medical professional took up his case.

One thing that I find chilling is the fear that asylum seekers have that anything they to the UKBA, to local people, and to the media will be held against them if they are returned.

For an asylum seeker to complain about their original persecution can be a death sentence if they are forcibly returned.

LineRunner Sun 03-Feb-13 19:54:00

sorry that should read 'anything they say to the UKBA...'

Booyhoo Sun 03-Feb-13 19:56:42


<penny drops>

thank you for very gently pointing out the obvious.

<makes note to engage brain before posting in future>

LineRunner Sun 03-Feb-13 20:18:38

Booey it was a very good point, though, worth talking about.

OP, I think there are lots of asylum seekers who feel that the odds are so stacked against them that they have to find all sorts of ways to 'prove' their cases to the UKBA. It's the UKBA who say, 'Prove it.'

catgirl1976 Sun 03-Feb-13 20:22:24

Oh Linerunner sad

That's horrific

BridgetBidet Sun 03-Feb-13 20:27:28

I think that the fact that there genuinely are gay asylum seeker who desperately need asylum is exactly the reason why those who are exploiting this system should be identified and weeded out.

Complaining that investigating an asylum claim based on the claimant's sexuality 'over emphasises' their sexuality is nonsense.

They say photos and videos are not evidence which is good as these could easily be faked for the purpose as photos of sexuality were faked for divorce cases back in the day when they were needed.

I think the fact is that UKBA will be aware of how the persecution of LGBT people occurs in these countries and will be able to tell a factual account from a made up account largely because of that knowledge. However they're not going to broadcast exactly what it is they're looking for because then false applicants will just give them exactly that when they know what it is.

I'm fairly confident though that if a genuine claimant can give a valid account of the persecution they have face, relationships they've had etc they'll be protected.

Booyhoo Sun 03-Feb-13 20:29:02

what would happen in the case of someone seeking asylum because they had been accused of being LGBT but actually weren't? i'm thinking that however that person is expected to prove they are in danger should be enough for a gay person to prove also.

does that make sense?

OxfordBags Sun 03-Feb-13 20:32:43

Bridget, LGBT asylum seekers usually have some difficulty proving they are such, precisely because they have had to keep their emotions and relationships incredibly secret. Some seeking asylum because they are LGBT and face horrors for it in their own country are actually virgins; they just know that they are not safe in their own country to be themselves and do not wish to live a lie.

Join the discussion

Join the discussion

Registering is free, easy, and means you can join in the discussion, get discounts, win prizes and lots more.

Register now