Advanced search

To wonder what repectable scientific notions of today....

(234 Posts)
RubyGates Sun 30-Dec-12 22:08:32

will be laughed at in a hundred year's time?

Things that were believed by scientists in the past:

ShellyBoobs Sun 30-Dec-12 22:14:54

Climate change.

Almost certainly.

ShellyBoobs Sun 30-Dec-12 22:15:28

Sorry, I meant climate change as a result of man's actions.

peaceandlovebunny Sun 30-Dec-12 22:18:28

none. we'll all have died, due to climate change.

ShellyBoobs Sun 30-Dec-12 22:34:00



You don't think anything supposedly scientific will ever be disproved again?

RubyGates Sun 30-Dec-12 22:34:30

See, I hadn't noticed that ulcers weren't caused by stress.
But apparently the chap who noticed they weren't got a Nobel prize.

RubyGates Tue 01-Jan-13 17:47:07

My bet's on String Theory...
And I think we'll redeiscover "the ether" and decide that's how things really work.

JustAHolyFool Tue 01-Jan-13 17:56:47

I would say a lot of stuff to do with space. I think they'll find out a lot more about what goes on in the universe, how big it is and so on.

And probably stuff to do with the brain as well.

GrimmaTheNome Tue 01-Jan-13 18:07:56

DH saw me reading the list in the link and suggested that the reason why we can't see Vulcan now is that it's been destroyed wink - I think he's got his timelines a bit muddled.

Some of current thinking in physics...the current models (as far as I can see) seem to be straining to try to explain the stuff we don't yet have a good handle on - dark matter and energy for instance. Surely there's got to be some game-changing new ideas which will supercede existing models?

kim147 Tue 01-Jan-13 18:16:09

Message withdrawn at poster's request.

GrimmaTheNome Tue 01-Jan-13 18:23:13

>I think there'll be a lot more found out about the brain.

yes, for sure - but the OPs question was whether any currently accepted theories will be falsified. I think with the brain we know we don't have anything like the full picture yet - so the question is how much of our current partial 'knowledge' is wrong.

OTTMummA Tue 01-Jan-13 18:29:09

oooo, luff freds like these,, i will go away and ave a fink ;)

JustAHolyFool Tue 01-Jan-13 20:13:45

I think what kim147 's point (and mine) was that the way we understand things like, for example, depression will change enormously. I can imagine we will be totally shocked at how we treated mental illness these days.

Pantomimedam Tue 01-Jan-13 20:17:26

Barry Marshall didn't just prove that ulcers are caused by h.pylori bacteria, he tested his theory on himself. Bit of a hero!

Pantomimedam Tue 01-Jan-13 20:19:29

Doctors used to believe autism was caused by 'refrigerator mothers' (because if you don't know what causes a medical condition, it's easier to blame women than admit you really don't know, apparently hmm). I wonder what conditions we think we know about now will turn out to have completely different causes to those we currently assume?

oldpeculiar Tue 01-Jan-13 20:19:50

climate change for sure
Probably weaning advice.They must be weaned by 4 weeks or be doomed.

SledYuleCated Tue 01-Jan-13 20:26:54

I always think chemotherapy/radiotherapy as a treatment for cancer will be laughable at some point in the future when we know more about causes/treatments. I mean, firing radioactiveness at people? I admit I don't know that much about how it works

kim147 Tue 01-Jan-13 20:32:29

Message withdrawn at poster's request.

CoteDAzur Tue 01-Jan-13 20:36:56

I don't see how ether will be "rediscovered" given that it has been proven not to exist through multiple experiments over a hundred years ago. Not to mention the fact that we manage to land people on the moon and send robots to Mars, calculating their trajectories without allowing for ether.

GrumpySod Tue 01-Jan-13 20:44:02

climate change skeptics will finally be shown to be the numpties they are.

The problem is that plenty of the ideas in that link are many centuries old, it's not like they were all popular 100 years ago, anything but.

I imagine that things like string theory will be massively revised in 100 years. We might finally get our heads around what the forces of gravity & magnetisim actually are, in 100 years.

There is so much more to understand, still, in the areas of neuroscience and psychology. Behavioural science still in infancy in many ways, too.

Catchingmockingbirds Tue 01-Jan-13 21:02:40

Electric shock therapy for children and adults with autism.

Avuncular Tue 01-Jan-13 21:23:54

Evolution - once David Attenborough has fossilised.

Darwinian 'natural selection' is one thing - but development from primeval slime is a bit harder to prove. More of a leap of faith IYSWIM

TravelinColour Tue 01-Jan-13 21:25:17

Message withdrawn at poster's request.

MostlyFine Tue 01-Jan-13 21:55:50

kim147 wasn't that article absolutely fascinating? I imagine that the idea of this second brain will change our understanding of brain chemistry/mental health immensely over the coming years.

chandellina Tue 01-Jan-13 22:15:09

I second the low fat diet thing, that's turned out really well right.

Join the discussion

Join the discussion

Registering is free, easy, and means you can join in the discussion, get discounts, win prizes and lots more.

Register now