That's it really.
I'm on the governing body at local primary school and the PTA have decided they are going to purchase a defibrillator for the first aid kit.
This is really down to one member of the PTA having suffered a terrible loss due to congenital heart defect which was undiagnosed in a child. NOT a child at this school I hasten to add.
Now, as a governing body, we have a wish list of what we would ideally like the PTA to help purchase, and at the moment we are prioritising interactive whiteboards, a new reading scheme and some new phonics materials - resources that will be used EVERY day by the pupils.
The PTA are insistent in buying the defibrillator ASAP, and I am equally insistent that we neither want/need it for the following reasons:
- The likelihood of it EVER being used is hopefully very very slim
- There is an ambulance station with trained medics less than 5 mins away at normal driving pace. On blues and twos an ambulance would/could be present inside of two mins.
- There has been no consultation with staff, yet 5 of them would be expected to be happy to be trained to administer the defibrillator if it
was required.
- There has been no consultation with parents to ascertain if they would be happy for their DCs to be defibrillated at school by a non-professional medic (I certainly wouldn't be)
Before I would be in the slightest happy about this, I want a demo from the company providing the equipment on how easy it is to use, bearing in mind it is a paediatric defibrillator.
I want to know who will make the decision that the defibrillator is required - ie who is going to diagnose the child with a failing heart?
What happens if/when it goes wrong? Will the administrator of the defibrillator be held responsible?
So am I being unreasonable?? Really appreciate your thoughts here as I need to feed back to governors at next meeting.