For personal reasons that are too boring to detail, I've taken on the editing of a PhD thesis on the side of my job. (I have done a fair bit of editing in my time). I work on the arts/hums-social science interface, with experience on both sides of that divide. I'm part-time.
I'm honestly appalled by what I'm reading. I've been employed to sort out a language issue, but this thesis isn't even up to the level of an undergraduate thesis in an intellectual sense. It's not theoretically or conceptually sound in any way. It doesn't contribute to knowledge empirically either; every finding within it is utter common sense. I would honestly fail it at MA level.
Yet it's being submitted for a PhD at a RG uni in a weak field of the social sciences, and I understand that it may well pass (provided "friendly" examiners are chosen). I really, hand-on-heart do not think it would pass in a RG arts and humanities faculty, I doubt it would pass in a stronger social science one either.
I know that standards have been sliding - and that this isn't necessarily the fault of candidates, but of the changing nature of the beast that is a thesis. But if this is what can now pass - a thesis that shows no reading, and makes no contribution - then the PhD is being rendered all but worthless. It also strikes me as unfair that candidates in one field are expected to deliver something that is of so much higher quality than candidates in another (though I suspect this is not a new feature of the university landscape).
Apologies for the rant. I'm finding this a completely thankless, miserable editing job and I wish I hadn't taken it on!
Please or to access all these features
Please
or
to access all these features
Academic common room
To think this is a scandal?
11 replies
whiskyowl · 06/02/2018 13:50
OP posts:
whiskyowl ·
07/02/2018 07:47
This reply has been deleted
Message withdrawn at poster's request.
Please create an account
To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.