Vice chancellor pay(8 Posts)
Sorry if I've missed this but I couldn't see a dedicated thread in the academics forum.
What are everyone's thoughts on the VC pay debate which seems to get worse by the day? It's now up to 800k payments! www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-bristol-42260090
My thoughts have evolved a bit over time. Originally my thoughts were along the lines of: Our VC is actually quite modestly (in comparison!) paid, and I think they earn it doing a huge amount of work. I'd have more concerns about the next level down who are on very high pay and nearly entirely invisible. Now, it's I can't see justification for 400-800k, especially when there's little to no correlation with size, performance, or any other factor. It's like for MPs: why aren't they on the same 1% pay increase cap as everyone else?
(OP from a new poster to this board: is the media on a fishing expedition?)
The opening post includes an exaggeration, because the 800k included one off pay outs.
VC salary is not comparable with that of MPs or ministers. The latter do extra consultancy work even while in office and ministers once out of office earn huge sums of money - just look at George Osborne and David Cameron.
The VC market is international and UK VCs are not highly paid by international standards. VCs are also not highly paid relative to CEOs of companies with thousands of staff.
The whole discussion is a big red herring (a) to neuter VCs from criticising government policy on Brexit and other HE matters and (b) to feed Adonis' ego after he didn't get the job he wanted. (Adonis is BTW the ultimate hypocrite given the salary levels he receives for his own part-time jobs.)
I have significantly more concerns about the whole structure of HE pay and the lack of transparency in very senior professors' pay, than I do specifically about VC pay levels.
@user19283746 no media, I'm SL in RG uni, just NC regularly in case accidentally say anything outing. Stuck at home with ill DD and thought lack of discussion curious.
I think we agree on the next level down being more serious - particularly I'd say in PSS. In my uni average PSS pay is only 1k pa lower than academics (publicly available figures) despite the very substantial number of grade 3's and 5's who are very poorly paid.
My concern with PSS is not just the pay - but also PSS making what should be "academic" decisions without having knowledge or understanding of the academic landscape.
Across the sector, there is an increasing urge to centralise and harmonise - when it is completely apparent to academics that e.g. what works for chemistry may well be inappropriate for history and vice versa.
Many people working in PSS seem to lose track of the fact that the goals of universities are education and research.
Again agree, although it could turn this thread into "us vs them".
I guess one of the good things about collaborative grants / reviewing them is that "within the system" there is a small level of transparency on what different academics are paid.
I don't think it's so much "us versus them": it's more that the leadership of a university (academic and PSS) need to work more closely with front line academics. (And I say that as somebody who is in the first category and continually trying to fight decisions that don't make sense academically.)
The VC pay outcry is baffling to me. Yes 400-800k seems excessive but I don't care about them getting lots of money (if competent) and why did the bath vc have to resign? And why now? We've seen the high bbc salaries and bankers' bonuses. There it seems that the 'need to recruit talent / be competitive ' argument washes but not for universities
The real question is the pay gap. Why aren't academics down the chain getting more?
But academics have no allies beyond the field. No one in gov or media is going to stand up and defend academics so it's a free for all and a massive deflection exercise from bigger issues and pay disparities
I can only digest the numbers with respect to the organisation budget.
The info I find online suggests that Bath Spa Uni has annual income of about £21million, so a basic salary of £250,000 is 1% (ish), that seems too high to me.
Join the discussion
Registering is free, easy, and means you can join in the discussion, get discounts, win prizes and lots more.Register now
Already registered with Mumsnet? Log in to leave your comment or alternatively, sign in with Facebook or Google.
Please login first.