Hello All. I'm hoping some of you might be willing to offer some arguments for me to store up for a discussion that is due to happen in my workplace soonish.
For context, I'm not in the UK and work for an NGO related to immigration, resettlement of migrants and asylum seekers, access to social welfare etc. I am currently the only woman on the senior staff group, along with six men.
Where we are, there is a statutory right to Maternity Leave, paid by the State. It is not a 'living wage' type amount. Many employers expect women to make do on that while on mat leave for six months, but right now my employer tops the statutory amount up to the normal full pay amount for employees on mat leave. The 'top up' amounts to two or three hundred per week, depending on the person's usual income. But this policy is soon to be reviewed.
As the only woman at the table, I feel a responsibility to put forward the strongest arguments I can for why the top-up should not be eliminated. This is what I have:
- Both men and women in the staff group will become parents, but only women will see their income drop by hundreds per week as a result. The fact that we are the ones doing the birthing and healing and (maybe) breastfeeding and therefore need to be the ones off work for at least the early part of those six months, is not a choice and is not within our control. We claim as an organisation to have a social justice agenda, and inequality based on women's biology is a social justice issue. As an employer we should have just policies even when the government policy is inadequate. The fact that the top-up costs more than it should is because of the wide gap between the statutory mat leave payment and the living wage that we pay. That's the fault of the government departments that pay too little toward maternity leave, not the fault of the mothers on our workforce.
- We currently have excellent staff retention and invest a lot into staff training and education. It is in our interest and in the interest of the people we serve to hold on to our committed, talented, experienced staff. If the women among that group who are in their 20s, 30s and 40s (almost all of them) have to choose between having children or keeping a liveable income, some of them will leave, which is a loss to us, and some of them will stay, not be able to afford to take mat leave, and feel that working for us has interfered with what they wanted for their lives. Which is bad for their relationship to the place, loyalty, motivation, positivity, feeling valued etc.
Those are my own views, but I'm concerned in case there are other points I could make that just aren't occurring to me.
Can any of you help to put some wise words in my arsenal? Or some answers against the likely arguments for eliminating the top up:
- It's unfair to the men who only get 2 weeks paternity leave (fully paid, no statutory contribution).
- Donors might not like the idea of money being spent on more favourable conditions for employees than are the norm in the sector.
3...... what other arguments do I need to be ready for??
I'd really appreciate any thoughts. Thank you.