I wondered what people make of the fact that a woman who is benefiting greatly from HRT, ie:
Protection from heart disease
Better distribution of healthy fats
Stronger bones
Increased libido
Better mental health
Better sleep patterns
Improved memory
.....to name a few of the many benefits,
has to give up HRT once she reaches the age of 60. She gets to have the 'talk' from her GP, apparently and they do their best to frighten you off taking them.
But a man of the same age, who is transgendering, is not only offered female hormones, but is apparently, allowed to stay on them indefinitely.
Is this fair to Women?
This is not another transgender 'bashing' thread.
I am genuinely interested, from a fairness (and equality) point of view really.
Surely if a woman is not allowed this treatment after a certain age, and has to accept that she will lose a lot of her womanly ways (lack of oestrogen causes a woman's body to start acting more like a man's especially when it comes to where fat is distributed),
then surely it's only fair that a man who is transgendering and is aged over 60' should also have to put up with less female hormones..
(I know about the slight increase of breast cancer, which by the way could do with updating - and is often quoted, which causes unnecessary scaremongering)
Are women getting a raw deal from the medical profession?
Please or to access all these features
Please
or
to access all these features
Feminism: Sex and gender discussions
HRT being denied to women over 60. What do you think?
95 replies
meyesmyeyes · 11/06/2015 15:09
OP posts:
Don’t want to miss threads like this?
Weekly
Sign up to our weekly round up and get all the best threads sent straight to your inbox!
Log in to update your newsletter preferences.
You've subscribed!
Please create an account
To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.