My feed
Premium

Please
or
to access all these features

Feminism: Sex & gender discussions

BBC sexism?

66 replies

fluffywhitekittens · 31/01/2015 21:41

www.telegraph.co.uk/women/womens-life/11379420/BBC-sexism-I-was-rejected-for-a-reality-show-because-Im-a-woman.html

The Feminist haters are out in force in the comments section...

I'm fairly certain that the BBC site initially made no reference to Men only but has amended the page so now states that they're looking for tough men.

OP posts:
Report
SardineQueen · 31/01/2015 22:22

Well if they didn't specify that it was men only then I'm not surprised she's pissed off. They asked for tough strong people who like physical challenges to apply, she spent time and effort doing so, thinking "well that sounds like me", only to be told that it never meant her.

They should have made it clear from the start that only men need apply and then she needn't have wasted her time.

I do agree with her though generally that if women are never represented in the mainstream as being able to do stuff - as being tough and strong and enjoying physical challenges - then there's no precedent in general women's heads that this stuff is an option for them IYSWIM.

Report
AICM · 01/02/2015 08:39

According to the Telegraph the show specifically explained it was, and I quote, "looking for the toughest men in the country".

The show is trying to replicate the selection process for the SAS.

Report
TywysogesGymraeg · 01/02/2015 08:48

I don't understand how the BBC are not breaking the law by stipulating "men only". Can anyone explain?

Report
SardineQueen · 01/02/2015 10:02

Because it's not to do with a supply of goods or services, or a job, I imagine. The law doesn't apply to everything ever it's specific stuff.

Report
PuffinsAreFictitious · 01/02/2015 11:56

The show might be trying to replicate the selection process for SF within the British military, however, I doubt it's going to include a lot of the selection criteria, so why does it have to retain the sex bar to women?

Report
BlameItOnTheBogey · 01/02/2015 15:54

I just don't get why you would exclude women. I don't buy the crap about replicating the SF - as puffins says, it won't be an exact replica anyway. Why not give a woman a shot. She will either meet the standard, in which case great she can compete. Or not, in which case you don't include her. It's not like she is asking for special dispensation, just an equal chance to compete.

Report
LumpySpacedPrincess · 01/02/2015 16:17

I read the comments and now I have to go and clean my brain.

Report
PuffinsAreFictitious · 01/02/2015 16:18

Never, ever, ever read the comments. Ever.

They are words to live by.

Report
SardineQueen · 01/02/2015 16:21

lol yeah comments = aarrrrgh

They don't want women in it as it's a prog about tough men being tough and manly.

Thinking about it, in the 80s, there were a lot of shows with physical challenges, and men and women competed side by side. Does that sort of thing go on any more? Not talking about sas stuff but, I don't know, gameshow type things. I don't watch ITV on a sat night these days so not got my finger on the pulse really Grin

Report
SardineQueen · 01/02/2015 16:22

Strictly has male and female competitors doesn't it and there's no problem with that despite dancing being considered "feminine".

Maybe it's just a matter of time.

Or is it that while things like dancing weren't done on TV by men it wasn't because they weren't considered able to do it. So it's not quite the same.

Report
msrisotto · 01/02/2015 16:28

The BBC are such twats, honestly. There is no reason to exclude women from this, so why are they doing it? Because they're twats. And the comments...ergh...disgusting.

Report
EBearhug · 01/02/2015 19:20

I wonder what their diversity and inclusion manager thinks? I know that's more to do with staff rather than programmes, but I can't believe they don't think that the programming output doesn't affect the view of the whole organisation. Because it does.

Report
fluffywhitekittens · 17/02/2015 19:21

So, looks like the BBC has changed their mind and will now consider females for the program....

OP posts:
Report
slightlyglitterstained · 20/02/2015 01:36

They've probably been slapped around the head and told "you idiots! Of course you need a woman in there. Bit of tension, amp up the pressure on the guys, ask 'em how they feel about the threat of being beaten by a woman. It's good tv. "

Report
Childrenofthestones · 21/02/2015 19:06

In the 80s, do you mean individuals and not teams ?
What shows were they?

Report
AKnickerfulOfMenace · 21/02/2015 21:07
Report
Dotheyfloat · 22/02/2015 10:28

With regards to program concepts the BBC shouldn't touch SF 'real as possible' selection processes with a barge pole. If they water them down to the point where women can reasonably compete it'll be a joke, if they don't water down the selection process there will be cries of 'unfair male bias' when all the women get knocked out in the early stages and/or stand zero of making it through.

Serve them right for not having the backbone to say 'men only'.

Report
PuffinsAreFictitious · 22/02/2015 11:21

So, DTF, do you think they'll be using a majority or just a selection of the selection criteria for SF? Which SF do you think they'll be choosing from? In what way will they be watering down the ones they leave in, do you think?

Report
Dotheyfloat · 22/02/2015 12:11

"But just after completing her form, Sophie was contacted by a spokesperson from ‘Team World’s Toughest Army’ who informed her that ‘in keeping with the selection criteria of the special forces’ the application process was open only to men. "

Presumably they were modelling the show on an SAS or Delta Force type selection process, i.e. ones that have a 90%+ fail rate for soldiers who are already mentally and physically combat-ready. The chances of a fit male civilian applicant passing those sort of selection processes are probably significantly less than 1%. The rate for women would of course be lower still, primarily due to the physical demands. A truly 'real as possible' TV format would result in most, perhaps all, of the applicants keeling over in the first week.

I'm not going to nitpick over what the BBC may-or-may-not do, as I said, the whole 'real as possible' concept should be avoided.

Report
PuffinsAreFictitious · 22/02/2015 12:18

I'm not going to nitpick over what the BBC may-or-may-not do, as I said, the whole 'real as possible' concept should be avoided.

And I don't. What would I know though? Hmm

Report
Dotheyfloat · 22/02/2015 12:38

I think you're trying make some kind of point, but I'm not sure what it is.

Report
AKnickerfulOfMenace · 22/02/2015 12:44

Hello again Dothey

Report

Don’t want to miss threads like this?

Weekly

Sign up to our weekly round up and get all the best threads sent straight to your inbox!

Log in to update your newsletter preferences.

You've subscribed!

Dotheyfloat · 22/02/2015 12:59

Good afternoon, AKOM.

Report
wyomingisnotacountry · 22/02/2015 14:08

The SF selection process is incredibly tough, only 10% or less make it and that's from men who are already far tougher than your average Joe on the street. This is part of the SAS trial :

''The final 40-mile march is named Endurance with good reason.

It must be completed within 20 hours without stopping while carrying a 60lb rucksack, a rifle and full water bottle.

At the end candidates should still be able to run four miles in 30 minutes.''

So that's 75lbs or so total. For 40 miles. Then the 4 mile run. And what if they do hand to hand combat as well? Who wants to see a 6'2'' 230lbs guy put a choke hold on a woman? He could snap her neck without even trying . No way. This whole thing is lose/lose for BBC. It's like putting a woman in the 100m or the weightlifting final, she'd finish miles behind the last man. We have gender segregated sports for a reason. Check even junior male sports record and they will far better than adult women's. Or your local amateur athletics club, there are men doing it as a hobby who would've won gold in the women's competitions at the last olympics.

Report
wyomingisnotacountry · 22/02/2015 14:40

I mean what would be the point of it? To see her beaten by miles? Humiliated? Physically hurt by men twice her size? And this isn't even going into women being far more exposed to injury than men because of lower bone density, weaker tendons, ligaments and so on.. I remember the outrage about the trans fighter who was beating up women, this would be 10 times more unfair.

Report
Please create an account

To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.