There is an article in the Independent today about an extra marital dating website. Ashley Madison.
The journalist who has written the article (Samuel Muston) interviwed two women for the article one of whom is called "Mary" and her husband no longer wants to sleep with her.
And another woman called Cindy.
THIS is what has made my piss really boil. He ends the article with.....
"Morally nether see what they do as problematic." Both simply want sex on their terms"
WTF Marys husband does not want to be physical with her any more. How the fuck is this "on her terms" Is she suppossed to put up and shut up? Simply because she happens to wear a bra.
Is she supposed to never have it again just because he decides he doesnt want it anymore.
So Samuel "Morally neither see what they do as problematic"
Morally does Marys husband see ignoring her needs as problematic? I have a nasty feeling we all know the answer to that one dont we.
www.independent.co.uk/life-style/health-and-families/features/online-dating-seeking-love-on-the-side-8500181.html
Please or to access all these features
Please
or
to access all these features
Feminism: Sex & gender discussions
Women in sexless marriages (at husbands instigation) ARE judged. And heres the proof.
45 replies
Darkesteyes · 19/02/2013 20:51
OP posts:
Don’t want to miss threads like this?
Weekly
Sign up to our weekly round up and get all the best threads sent straight to your inbox!
Log in to update your newsletter preferences.
You've subscribed!
Please create an account
To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.