You won't get back to 50:50 unless the ex consents to it - she's been unilaterally changing the parental schedule and unless you propose to change it yourself you've got an uphill battle.
When/If it goes to court, and CAFCASS get involved i.e what used to be the court welfare officers - they make a report for court on the issues before it i.e. joint residence/sole residence/contact order) they will ONLY make a report on the CURRENT STATUS QUO of the parent schedule. i.e. what happens atm. They make NO reference to what happened before be it 2 weeks ago, 2 months ago or 2 years ago. A major failing , yes, but then CAFCASS are a failing organisation, underfunded, under-resourced and their staff are under-prepared and not sufficiently trained for their role. Sad but true.
If you have concerns about the childrens home environment at the ex's then what are your options? contact social services? (believe me, you DON'T want SS involved in your life)... what do you mean by a 'dangerous' environment please expand....
as to the schoolwork etc, the best way to approach this probably is via the school - do you have a good relationship with the school, maybe have a chat with the kids teacher or head (informally) about their progress etc and any worries they may have. Of course schools don't really want to get involved in the cross-fire of parental disagreement so tread carefully.
A SRO means that legally BOTH parents are equal - the child has a dads and a mums home of equal status. Many parents who don't have a SRO come into problems with LEAs, schools, medical authorities etc. Contact me off-forum for further info on shared parenting, my email addy is - jitsuka at hotmail dot com. I think there isn't that much you can do regarding what the child does on the ex's parenting time ... that's what being a parent is unfortunately.
CSA:
- it doesn't matter what the hell the CSA may believe or not. They have procedures to follow.
My best advice for CSA matters is to join NACSA (google them), I'm a member too.
Basically CSA decide who is the "resident" parent on the basis of who is in possession of the child benefit book. This is a passport to other benefits. The more overnights you have for the children, the less CSA monies the ex gets, so you see, there is a financial incentive for the ex to reduce the number of o/n's.
Is the ex on benefits? If so then she has to by law name dad otherwise she gets less money. Any chld maintenance that DP pays via the CSA .... well the ex gets an extra tenner a week, the rest goes to the treasury!
The CSA can only make a claim from the initial time of contact with DP, this probably include telephone contact. Usually CSA can't be backdated as any new claim can only be activated from the first time of contact. NEVER SPEAK TO THE CSA. Always communicate by letter - if they phone, tell them that you are requesting to communicate ONLY by letter and refuse to speak to them. This is because the CSA are completely incompetent and get things wrong so many times. With a written evidence of communication it's easier to prove if they get things wrong.
Usually the CSA will make a crap assessment. Use the CSA online calculator to caluclate your CSA assessment. The 'going rate' is 15% of net income with reductions for more than 52 overnight stays per year (i.e. by 1/7th) and further reductions for children that DP is responsible for - i.e. any new children that you have.
It's always worthwhile making any sort of child maintenance easily traceable i.e. by standing order to the ex marked "child maintenance" so that bank records can be printed off.
Feck the CSA off, they are a completely incompetent organisation.
keep strong, please contact me if you want any more help!
x