Here some suggested organisations that offer expert advice on SN.
Feeling nervous about DD2's appointment tomorrow(70 Posts)
What if the paed doesn't see what we are seeing? We will still be left with the same child, who still has all the issues we see.
Today, she had a major meltdown. She couldn't find her socks at Nanny and Grandad's. She wouldn't wear her shoes because she had no socks. She didn't want to leave with bare feet. We didn't have her socks - they may have gone home with her cousin. She was hysterical and her solution was for DH to drive home, collect some socks and drive back again, so that we could all drive home.
Then, she was incensed because DDs 1&3 were singing. They wouldn't stop, so she was screaming 'SILENCE, SILENCE, SILENCE, SILENCE!!!!!!'
I have another migraine
Lougle just want to wish you good luck and for the doctor to be useful! Will be thinking of you x
Good luck for tomorrow lougle
Remember you know your Dd2 better than anyone, stick to your guns.
Regarding the socks, Dd3 came home from the park with her wooly hat on her foot because her sock was covered in mud but she couldnt possibly sit in the car for 5 minutes with a bare foot
It will be ok. You already know how to talk to paediatricians so they 'hear' you. They don't need to see it (yet), they just need to believe there are valid concerns and make a plan for how to explore them.
Get there early, give dd2 a and have a in the hospital cafe before going down the corridor, so you have your 'I belong here' head firmly on.
Mariammama is spot on. I will be thinking of you, Lougle. Good luck x
You're right, I'm being silly. I think I want answers, so I'm geared up for a big appointment, when we'll probably get an 'ok, keep a diary for 6 years then come back.'
keep detaialed recods of things.. hopefully not for 6 years...
push them for an explanation of what else could be happening then.
have you been on a parenting course? they do like to send you on those first...(sigh) round here anyway. did one just in case they come back at me and say i do need to do one afterall.
I have nothing useful to add, but wanted to wish you good luck.
An early good morning and good luck Lougle If you are like me I didnt sleep much the day before lol x
It will be ok. You will have your I belong head on as maria says.
Will be thinking of you.
I'm hoping to avoid the parenting course suggestion (not that they aren't useful, but because they seem to be used as a delaying tool) as DD1 has complex SN, goes to SS and we've seen this Paed for the last 4 years with her. Also, DD2 isn't behaviourally challenging, really, just hard to deal with once she is fixated on something.
I slept like a log last night coffee, but only because I had such and awful migraine that I took my sumatriptan injection and a diazepam
Oh well, I'm confident that whatever it is, it's not going away, so even if he doesn't see it this time I'll be back like a bad penny and every time I see him with DD1, I'll mention DD2
Oh and I have a 10 page (10pt) document with my observations -quotes, etc.
Best wishes for today lougle
Good luck today, lougle.
Your story re: socks could have been written about my dd2. That is exactly the solution she came up with in a similar situation
Honestly, dd1 is more flexible than dd2 is!
The language thing is odd, though. Does your DD2 have odd language, Silver?
We were meant to see the dentist this morning. I told her the dentist had canceled, and she said "dentists don't get poorly "Then she said "oh do you mean the person who looks at your teeth? I thought you meant the building was poorly, because you said the dentist was poorly and dentist is the building."
Dd2 has some oddities about her language, yes.
She routinely gets completely muddled as to active/passive - not in a technical sense, but can eg say "Fred is cuddling George" when she means the exact opposite. She spends a lot of time sighing and saying "yes! I said that!" when she said nothing of the sort, or the exact opposite.
I think her general advanced language (she is the typical 'little profesor' type) are masking a deficit in comprehension.
Her biggest ( and most noticeable to others) issue is that she often place adjectives incorrectly, so will say things like 'I want a ball blue' or 'can I have some warm-leggers'. This is a very common ( and glaring, for her) mistake.
Have you photocopied your 10-pager for the Paed, Lougle? Good to let them have one to read, huge time-saver.
Really hope you get somebody who does justice to your intelligent, child-centred approach. At least you will come out with a referral to SLT. Crossing everything here.
Let us know how it goes.
With DD2 it seems to be the hundreds of clauses within clauses.
"mummy will you tell Daddy, and Daddy to tell the children, that is DD1 and DD3, that they must be quiet, because I am sleeping?"
"Mum, if somebody has some milk, and it's bedtime, and they don't drink the milk, and it's the next day, is it old milk?
It's exhausting to listen to
That sounds like Dd3 lougle and if she misses a step out of whatever she is telling me she has to start all over again. Sometimes this can happen several times in one one sided coversation
good luck/how did it go?
yes I got the impression that a parenting course is the first thing that comes outof the drs mouth when I went to the gp... had to pull the well in my professional opinion card... as a foundation/ks1 teacher and was allowed to miss that step my most valuable piece of paper is the report that says I am doing everything right and do not need the parenting course.
Ok, so my report is 9300 words I think the doctor will regret saying 'so what are your concerns?'
Waiting and hoping all went ok
Message withdrawn at poster's request.
Me too, am waiting and hoping (and honking some more).
Well we're back. Basic summary is that speech doesn't concern him, but he noticed some physical coordination issues and some aspergers indications, but not enough of either to suggest a diagnosis.
So he's going to discuss her at the ASD referral meeting tomorrow, refer her to OT and audiology, copy the school in on the letter, then see her in 6 months.
He suggested reading about dyspraxia and reading the out of sync child.
Well... It's a start, how do you feel about it?
It is very similar to ds's first appt with developmental paed, sent off with referral to OT and SALT in our case, I am pretty sure it was the OT assessments that tipped the balance for ds.
I'm not sure. He said that if we just wanted an ASD DX then he could refer (bear in mind we've seen him for 4 years, so we have 'cards on the table talks), but I Sayyid I didn't want that, I want to identify what, if anything, is causing her issues.
Trouble is, she's so passive that she's not going to cause trouble.
I am surprised he isn't concerned about the speech and language when a SALT has told me she sounds disordered though.
How do you feel about it, Lougle? Good that the wheels have started moving. Am surprised at no SLT referral but what do you think?
Ooh x posted. Did u tell him about your SLT convo?
Lougle, in some areas you can self refer from SALT assessment, it may be worth looking into.
Good that he has referred for OT though and that he has pbviously seen enough to make him want to discuss her at the referral meeting.
Sometimes it can take a long time for these complicated children to get a diagnosis [or not as the case may be].
He didnt offer you a parenting course though
No, he didn't offer a parenting course! DD2 is very passive and he knows DD1, who is anything but.
I didn't say what the SALT said.
He did say he thought she had poor theory of mind, but added that it isn't exclusive to ASD and that if she has sensory integration issues then it can change perception of the world.
When Dd3' theory of mind was tested and she really didnt have a clue [bless her]
I asked the SALT who tested her what other conditions could lead to it being so under developed [we already suspected ASD but kept being told it was unlikely]
The SALT who works with children with ASD everyday said that it is normally only ASD that causes children not to develop theory of mind.
Of course many people dont really like to use the theory of mind argument but personally I think it has a massive effect on Dd3's understanding of the world.
would this count as a theory of mind issue?
Watching 101 Dalmatians (again) and nanny says "14.....there are only 14 puppies, one died"
DD2 says "why is nanny lying? the other puppy is alive"
she can't understand that we know that the puppy lives, but nanny doesn't know that yet.
Yes, because she thinks that nanny should know because she knows. IYSWIM
She doesnt realise that other people dont know what she is thinking or that other people have different thoughts to her.
Not sure if it goes under theory of mind but DS is the same where films or anything comes from. We should KNOW whats happening or going to happen next because he does!
Sometimes he has already made a plan of events in his head and is annoyed when it doesnt go to plan not noticing that he hasnt actually TOLD us what the plan was he assumed we should know iyswim x
Things are moving for her now and that is a good thing.
I didnt just want ASD either I held out and requested everything defined explained individually as he was complex and some strategies dont necessarily help other issues. Well done
My dd 13 ASD doesn't have theory of mind but she passed the tests for it as they were stories and then questions and she knows what you're supposed to do but doesn't do it in real life.
Lougle, My ds 5 has a phonological speech disorder and some of the things he says sounds like your dd (eg says "I've eaten my dinner all") and he has word finding difficulties along with hypermobility and social anxiety that presents like selective mutism. He is under assessment with CDC and they asked me if I thought it was ASD as no one can decide. The thing is I don't know either and I'm not an expert. My dd has meltdown after meltdown where as my ds is placid and over compliant. This worries me that whatever is going on (and I know there is a something going on) will get missed.
DD2 passes the Sally & Anne test - I did it earlier (at home).
Well done. The ASD meeting might come up with a SLT appotinemtn anyway. if not, self-refer if you can, or cheekily push the school to do so even if they aren't sure (I printed off and completed the forms for them so the senco only had to print off an IEP and sign the box )
Hmm, interesting lougle
I still think it would be worth you asking for a salt assessment. As you have said she has some unusual language issues.
The dalmations thing indicates that her ToM is not quite where it should be, but then again she is still little so she may just need more time.
It's really interesting that of all the issues I wrote down (10 pages) I dedicated only 2 paragraphs to 'physical issues' and simply noted that she is physically cautious, yet that was the thing he noticed most.
Lougle there are different levels of ToM test, dd2 passed one but not the other. It was more sophisticated, will search it out.
I think if there is any ? Over ASD a SALT evaluation would be key because language issues can just look so much like ASD. I would consider asking specifically for a referral.
Am interested in what other conditions involve under-developed ToM.
HiLougle ds1 is extremely cautious as well and passive. Although he has a Dx of ASD and probably has SPD as well, which we have only discovered recently.
Not trying to compare here but just thought that I should mention that he has been having regular OT weekly and is doing AIT and light therapy and has made really good progress with it. So maybe the Paed is really onto something with noticing the cautiousness and the OT referral. I would be really encouraged by it.
I agree handy, Dd3 did one involving balls under coloured cups (like the magicians trick), only she watched where the ball was put while I was out of the room. She was totally convinced that I would know where the ball and been moved to
Fairly conclusive I would say.
Even the SALT was surprised at how clear cut it was as she had originally been one of the people who didnt think Dd3 had ASD!!
I improvised but I used two teddies and two trainers, with a playing card.
I told her that Lorna (her teddy) had a lovely card, and she didn't want anyone to touch it, so she put it in her trainer. Then she went out to play. But giraffe is very naughty, and he stole the card, then moved it to his trainer. Lorna came back to get her playing card. Where would she look?
DD2 immediately said 'her trainer'. When I said why? she said 'because she putted it there.'
Bless her cottons might give this a go when DD's language is up to it.
Ok I found it here. please fast forward through the VERY basic A-Level psychology article to the Strange Stories. We did the Sarah and Tom picnic story which dd2 was clueless about. Also the relationship with these tests (which have mainly been tested on subjects with a lower verbal IQ) seems not completely clear cut for those with higher verbal IQ.
Ah, but Lorna is probably real and has a mind of her own (albeit one which works exactly the same as dd2's ). Lorna knows you can't believe anything involving giraffe, who is just a toy and can't really do stuff .
Maria, you made me laugh, you are so right!
I'm just gutted too, though. I wanted him to either say 'defnitely neurotic' or 'actually, you're right and she has x'. Instead I got a (honest but frustrating) 'bits of that, bits of this, not sure and even if I was might not get diagnosis' and see you in 6 months.
School's going to love me.
The original answer I received when anticipating a dx was "he is very complex, nothing will go away overnight" "keep going you are doing well" went home and it bugged the hell out of me. Complex at what? what is it, was it or what does he have. Its a disappointing mind blower when you receive bits. We were discharged with that an advised to get his hair cut!
Dont worry about school. The Pead is onto something ie some as/asd traits, poss dyspraxia issues, maybe some sensory. These are what you can safely tell the school she is currently still under assessment for and to treat her accordingly.
Strike out the neurotic mother bit too! he would have said that indirectly in his first sentence if you were lol.
I think he knows you are right and he is just getting all the info and assessments together. In all fairness an OT appointment can take months so a 6 month review should tie in nicely with it
Sorry lougle I meant encouraging in a way that paed is not dismissing your concerns out of hand. It's a double edged sword though isn't it, on the one hand, you want these issues to be noticed, on the other hand, it hurts like hell that they do get noticed. ((Hugs))
Yes, DH said he felt like we were betraying her before we went in. If I thought it would go away, I wouldn't bother the Paed.
I worry that he was saying that she could be one of these 'sub-diagnostic' children who don't meet any criteria fully and we may need to just cherry pick methods. Not because we can't or aren't willing to do that, but because the biggest battle is going to be getting school on board and they don't see the issues. A 'label', if nothing else, would legitimise my request for them to at least observe DD2 and see how she is dealing with school.
I used to worry about that with Dd3 lougle, she meers bits of criteria from all over the place.
It may take a while but if she needs a diagnosis she will get one if you are persistant.
There were times during the process when I felt like giving up but ultimately I knew Dd3 was going to need support at school.
I think you just have to go with your instinct now, see what OT throws up and take it from there.
You are not betraying her, you are being a good parent.
We were told dd 14 (13 when diagnosed) prob wouldn't get a dx as she was complex. The Ed Psych explained that she has bits of lots of things and each of them on there own in isolation were quite easy to support but all together they were compounding her difficulties and making it really difficult for her.
She ended up with a dx of mild/moderate ASD with ADHD traits, demand avoidance as part of her asd, mild auditory dyslexia, auditory processing difficulties, significant impairment of motor skills, hypermobility, low core tone and problems with muscles in her legs!! I think that's everything lol x
Sorry forgot sensory processing difficulties!!!
Lougle we've been under Paeds for nearly four years now (two referrals, one from private SALT and one from school). That feeling in the pit of my stomach that dd2 is not NT does not go away but I keep telling myself the average age for diagnosis of HFA is eight so we are not that unusual with all the 'watching and waiting' and endless form filling. I am going to request NHS SALT re-referral when we go back in Feb (tentatively, as IME sorry to say they are rubbish) because in terms of the curriculum it is only just starting to show (hit a wall with reading comprehension) so have faith that you will eventually get what you need out of all this if you keep nudging people in the right direction even if everyone thinks you are bonkers. The fact that you have not been discharged is enough vindication for now <holds out hand for holding along the way>.
I didn't realise the average age is 8. I might email him, thank him for his time and say that, on reflection,we would be reassured by a Salt assessment as we feel she isn't comprehending as well as she appears to.
What do you think?
Yes yes, I would definitely do this.
Go Lougle xxxx
Actually I would ring him to make the whole thing easier while your dd2's file is to hand, if you are lucky you might also get an update on the ASD referral.
He doesn't do phone very easily -he's always dashing off to panels, etc., but I have his email address and he is reliable with that.
I think that is a great idea lougle.
When Dd3 had her first SALT assessment at 8 I was shocked at some of the things she struggled with.
Bearing in mind that she was talking at 12 months and apart from quite a few quirks and her literal understanding of language I thought her language was advanced.
Actually her social language and understanding of more complex language was quite behind and things like conversation sharing and talking on another persons chosen topic was non existant.
Hope your paed agrees to refer to SALT.
Well I emailed (outing myself completely here) saying:
"Thank you for seeing DD2 yesterday, the appointment was very useful.
We have reflected on our discussions and still feel concerned that DD2 is not comprehending language as we would expect, although this is masked quite effectively at times. We appreciate that she didn't say a great deal at the appointment and she performs better with concrete subject matter, but we feel she has some significant difficulties.
Would it be possible for her to be referred to SALT for an initial assessment?"
He replied, agreeing to refer but warning of a long wait due to no school report (I suspect 'no school support' is the bigger issue, tbh).
So I found my inner tiger mummy and said:
"Thank you. I was expecting a long waiting list and if our concerns are justified the issues will still be there regardless of the timeframe.
So I'm hoping that he'll get the message that we aren't looking for a quick fix, but we aren't going away either.
I was fobbed off with DD1 for 2 years before we even saw a paed and she's in special school now, so I'm well practiced at the long game.
Well done you polite, direct and to the point
Great news lougle, now wait a week or two for him to make the referral, then phone salt's and ask if they have recieved the referral and then tell them that you are available at short notice if they get a cancellation.
I have done this a couple of times and it had shortened the wait quite considerably.
I've spotted that despite the health centre saying you need referral, the hospital website says you can contact directly so I figure if I phone them and ask for 'advice' about DD2's differing presentation in different situations and that a salt has informally suggested my concerns are justified, they might be interested enough to bump her out of the 'neurotic parent worrying about fs and ths' pile into the 'does this child have disordered language'pile.
I've been phoning since 9 though, and there's no reply yet. oh well, 6.5 hours left today....
lougle, has he given you a timeframe re the other referals? DS2's OT's have been able to by-pass SALT lists and drag a SALT in to some of their sessions as they needed to understand his language comprehension level.
DS2's sensory processing issues manifest themselves with physical & co-ordination difficulties so work on those has helped hugely improve his physical abilities & helped ease his frustration.
He too is very passive & quiet, especially at school.
No, he didn't. For DD1, I got a letter saying 'long waiting list, we'll let you know when we can see you.'
I'm wondering if bibic would be worth contacting to get a fill picture?
Join the discussion
Registering is free, easy, and means you can join in the discussion, get discounts, win prizes and lots more.Register now
Already registered with Mumsnet? Log in to leave your comment or alternatively, sign in with Facebook or Google.
Please login first.