Yes it is Boch, but that is his safety-net so probably of all the things you could get arsey about that might have to be one of the top ones.
Social Services calling you on trying to get a strategy in place for enabling ds to access school/reduce anxiety - really?
I suppose your best defense then would to make a written demand request from the outset. You will be able to clearly outline the reasons and point to the fact that it is a well-accepted strategy. You will also get a good understanding of the school and their ability/willingness to work with you from your reply. Make it clear it is a PREVENTATIVE as well as an EARLY INTERVENTION.
All of ds' previous schools would have said 'Let's see how he gets on first and if we think he is getting anxious then we'll arrange for him to see the school nurse/counsellor'. Far to late at that point.
I suppose I'm just trying to warn others that you can work your butt off with the child to get them to a point where they can actually express their needs, only to realise that yet another mountain awaits you. The child is only part of the story.
It's a large part of why I'm personally so excited by the move to "outcomes" as expressed in the new plans for replacing statements. I'm hoping desperately it'll challenge this - 'Let's see how he gets on first and if we think he is getting anxious then we'll arrange for him to see the school nurse/counsellor'. Far to late at that point." mentality at source, so that perhaps us parents won't have to?
As a point of interest I'd love to see a national survey of how many 1:1 TA's have seen their child's statement, much less their SALT or OT targets etc.