OK
So far I have:
"Why are we having a CAF meeting?
All the decisions are being made without my, my husband?s or my daughter?s consent or agreement, why am I even here? Decisions I had put into place or instigated have been removed or cancelled as a result of a professionals meeting.
? I have sought emotional support for DD through a charity for VI children. They have been told not to let DD attend and removed the youth worker who had arranged to see DD throughout the summer.
? I instigated a 121 for DD through the single area panel, this has been stopped
? I have been told to stop her drumming and singing lessons ? I haven?t as I don?t see them as connected to her sight.
I keep being told I need CBT despite the lady I was sent to suggesting that I need emotional support rather than CBT. I have since arranged this for myself as the GP seemed incapable or unwilling to help.
I have no written evidence that the course of action which has been decided upon is effective. It goes against all instinct and in fact the evidence proves the opposite to be true, which can be seen by my evidence, that of my father and independent evidence provided by TJ."
My report on DD
"During the holidays DD has appeared happy and bubbly. She seems to enjoy Drumming, music lessons & socialising with her friends although she misses joining in with Look activities. She hasn?t read, or participated in any ?close work? although she enjoyed a drama summer school and several dancing events. Her sight seemed to remain at the level it was at the end of last term.
Whilst on our family holiday she struggled with the new environment and often bumped into things or got ?lost?.
As a return to school approached she has seemed more and more anxious and she has showed fear of attending school and frustration that she must attend. She has reported to her Grandmother that she is ?always? being teased and that she hates it. Her sight has also been observably worse, although not as bad as it was in March, it seems definitely worse than it was in July."
My Dad's thoughts:
"DD
These appear to be facts or factually based opinion on the basis of our knowledge:
- There is nothing physically wrong with DD?s eyes.
- Her reported perception of sight was improving during the late term and summer school holidays, though it remained poor at close distances.
- It may have deteriorated close to the end of the holidays and into the new term though her mid-distance and long sight remains improved. Unless DD is an actor of consummate skill her sight in relation to close work remains very poor and functionally inadequate for much of her schoolwork.
- From the early onset of improvement her parents have accepted that, notwithstanding their concerns about a possible physical cause for DD?s loss of visual acuity there was little medically to do except to accept the diagnosis of a physiological disorder.
- DD has apparently been entirely happy with all her out of school activities. She has proved a real talent at the drumming lessons and enjoys this activity. She has related to the LOOK outings and events as social occasions rather than anything that mark her out as special. The ?Belle Indifference? syndrome seems to remain firmly rooted.
- She has complained to her Grandmother about boys teasing her at school about whether she can really see or not. This appears not to be based on an isolated example but she will not provide detail. Her Grandmother is taking the view that she should simply try and ignore these events, as her indifference to them is most likely to persuade them to desist.
- She is less happy at school than she was last term.
- Katymac has discussed her attitudes and behaviour with the referred cognitive therapy practitioner who can see no value in this therapy, as the therapist does not believe that Katymac?s behaviours or concerns are irrational. (This tends to reinforce the opinion of the family psychologist that Kate?s conduct has been rational within a very disturbing set of events and that little has been done to try and sympathise with her position or allay her concerns. May not include this bit
- It is concerning to the family that the meeting of ?professionals?, which we understand recommended the withdrawal of support and the discontinuance of any extra-curricula activity which DD may relate to her sight, has not provided to the family any evidence based reason for their conclusions or any particular advice on how she is to continue without support at school.
10. Our belief is that the school has been the most pro-active and consistent source of help and support. Furthermore the school?s knowledge of DD is such that they are probably best placed to determine what and how much specialist and general support she requires. I am afraid that my own experience of specialist medical services is that they too often operate without due regard to the context in which they deliver their opinions and operate their protocols."
TJ's
"improving and DD has settled back into school, as I did notice that when I came to visit you at the beginning of the Summer for your unannounced visit she seemed very content but was very subdued when I came at the end of the Summer." from an email