Log in with:
Register to join the discussion, get discounts and more.
Please enter a valid email address.
Please check your email to confirm your account, and you'll be ready to go.
This is page 1 of 1 (This thread has 14 messages.)
I thought it a rather elegant acknowledgement of a special event. Yes, it's special to every family, but his had an excess of media attention.MNHQ just acknowledging it in a modest way (have not been on the site for a week or two, so if there was also some OTT coverage, I am happy to say I missed it)
Oh stupid me - looked more closely. I didn't think princes wore crowns...
Think it's for the commonwealth games, perhaps?
Ooh no, not worth risking an AIBU on this. That's why I came straight to Site Stuff after worrying about it for several days to ask.I only start an AIBU when I already know the answer.
Message withdrawn at poster's request.
Ok, thank god it's not just me! My eye keeps being drawn to it, like it's something I've not noticed before, but a part of me was wondering, have I just been really unobservant...
I though that MN towers had it on good authority that Prince George is a red head, like uncle Harry.
You mean other than it looking like the baby is on fire?
I thought it was the biscuit thing
I thought that too. It's a wee baby crown, not the Olympic torch!
Or out of date?
Or am I just being daft?
Join the discussion
Registering is free, easy, and means you can join in the discussion, get discounts, win prizes and lots more.
Already registered with Mumsnet? Log in to leave your comment or alternatively, sign in with Facebook or Google.
Please login first.