AIBU to actually be told which sets DD is in?(48 Posts)
I've posted before about the lack of information from DD.s school (she is in year 7) . They were put into sets a couple of weeks ago and we have not received any kind of info as to which sets she has been placed - DD has had a guess at a few and in some lessons the teacher has said "because you are x set I expect this and this etc" but really it's just guesswork and I think it's a bit poor of the school not to send out some explanatory gumpf to co-incide with the timetable re-jig.
Am I being unreasonable? Is this just the way it is at high school and I should bloody well get used to it?
We've never been told. Only know from the descriprion on the front of workbooks. The reports don't even say.
What year is your child in, Kez?
We have never been formally told but all the kids know. They were set in Maths and English in Yr7 and now in Yr8, there are top sets in Science, Geography and History but anything below top set is mixed ability. I think it depends on the school. Another local school divides the whole school in half and has a top half and "bottom" half for every lesson (glad DS is not at that school but depends on the child - if you were in the top half then it might be better than being in the mixed ability classes at our school).
We have been formally told via a letter home
It came with tons of caveats about how placements can go down as well as up - nothing's fixed forever.
A whole paragraph explained it was futile to complain at this stage as it is based on loads of tests as well as the KS2 SATS and all sorts of other considerations and they wont even think about changing sets until next year now anyway. The letter stated that well over 50% of the cohort had arrived from primary school with a level 5 or higher in their SATS so not to be surprised if your child was not in the expected (top) group. It said that even children in the lower sets would all still be expected to get at least a C at GCSE in all core subjects and that being in the lower sets was no bar to later options.... Then in tiny print it told us the sets for each subject.
The nature of the letter made me think they must be inundated with complaints every year when they inform parents about sets. Theyd tried to cover all bases. Maybe thats why some schools chicken out but I do agree you should be told.
My daughter is 16 and is at college. So, she has been right through secondary. Son is in year 10.
I think over the years I have had three communications in total on their sets, all conversations. One when my daughter was put up in English at the 11th hour before her GCSEs, one on my son who is technically in the wrong English set but it means he can be in the right Maths one (and a compromise was necessary) and one - at parents evening - when I was concerned about my daughters English set in year 8 and was reassured it was the right place for her to be. Otherwise I have only known from the schoolbook description, so I do know, just not 'officially'.
have never received any information about this from the school....ever.
No, we were never told either. I found out once that DD was in top set, only to find out later that they divide the school in half so there were two top sets.
Mine are about to leave secondary, and all I ever knew was that they were in the "fast track" for maths, and the DC told me - not the school.
I'm not sure that parents need to know TBH. What difference would it make if you knew? I don't think you'd have an argument for asking them to move up or down, because you'll have no idea of the ability of the other 240 people in the year group to measure your own DC against.
I am really surprised that so few people are told. All the schools around here set children. Some do it just for maths, some do it in all core subjects and some have just a top group with the rest is mixed ability teaching. But all of them tell parents officially in Year 7 or Year 8 where their children have been placed. From what I can gather all of them also have the same caveat-ridden letters home that we got too because I imagine (like reading levels in Infant School) it is something that parents can get
overly involved in worried about.
It is only a big deal I think if they have rules like only the top set can do higher papers at GCSE (our school doesn't - children in all sets will sit higher papers except a very few) and parents may want to question that which they should be able to do. It is too late when they're about to take exams and find out that they are limited on what they can do.
Even where the sets have no implications on exams though, I don't like school attitudes that parents are too ill informed to be trusted with information and are deliberately kept in the dark. Our old school used to do it about SATS levels (the children had to sit optional SATS but the school would refuse to divulge the results unless you wrote a letter to the Head officially requesting them then had a meeting to be talked out of it then insisted on having them then got them but with bad grace...... SATS levels are a tiny snapshot and arguably no big deal in Year 4 but it is just bloody annoying when schools 'won't tell' on principle).
We get a letter at half term with the new timetable enclosed - although the letter didn't explicitly state the sets (every subject is set) the timetable did say 7x1 or 7x2 - the final number being the set. Odd that other schools don't given they're supposed to communicate with parents!
School communication is always dire.
Like why do children drop NC level when they go from primary to secondary? Why isn't there continuity.
Like why are NC levels in MFL in KS3 so out of kilter with everything else (I don't get the "they've only just started studying this" arguement)
Like the confusion over grading at KS4: does a B grade mean "if you carry on like this, you will get a B at the end of the GCSE" or does it mean "if you took the exam tomorrow, you would get a B". What on earth is the point of the latter - DC is not taking the exam tomorrow so the concept is just plain weird.
Like having four levels of grading for effort. This means that there is no middle grade: everyone is either 'above average' or 'below average'. It's a total nonsense.
<and breathe ...>
we are not told
and frankly its the school's business, not the parents'
as only the school has the data on the whole cohort so knows WHY different pupils have been put in different sets
in a school with 300 per year, no parent knows where their child is relative to others at least until the middle of year 8
I suspect it's to stop parents going in and complaining. We weren't told at either junior or secondary, but the kids work it out fairly quickly.
Only thing is you get things like dd's friend, who told dd that said friend was top set when she wasn't, and I had a sort of embarrassing conversation with friend's mum who was commiserating that my dd wasn't in the top set with friend. Unfortunately for her it was dd who was in the top set not hers. Not sure at what point she found out.
senua Dc's junior school gives marks for effort
Um.. do you not think they could at least put "D-unsatisfactory" even if they have no intention of using it? In this case everyone has to be above average.
We are told the information about our child only.
We aren't told 'your child is in the bottom of set 1 but, if he doesn't buck his ideas up, Fred in set 2 will get his place because they're pretty much the same level'
We get told the sets - that's it.
We aren't invited to offer our opinion or allowed to nominate which group we think our child should be in.
Of course you get some parents go in and try to argue for the sets to be changed. By all accounts they don't get very far since most sane parents understand that only the school can and should know how all the other children perform in relation to our own child.
I think that is why the school explain that well over 50% start on level 5's to reassure parents that the set is all relative to a fairly bright cohort. I am not saying schools should enter into negotiations about setting but they should be honest about it just as they should tell parents anything they want to know about their own child that does not breach the confidentiality of other children.
Tiggytape - actually I think it IS the parent's business. Schools and parents should be a partnership, in support of the child. It's much easier to work as a partnership when both parties are in full possession of the facts. Obviously I don't need to know little Billy in class 1's levels, but I would quite like to know where my child is in relation to the rest of his cohort, and I'd like some broad brush context to that - as in 50% of the year got Level 5s.
(I am embarassed to add that yes I am that parent who complained about their child's set for one subject - but in our case it was justified and clear that a mistake had been made - for which the HoY apologised)
Nope. Never told. Kids know of course and might talk about it but it was seen as the children's business and the school's business. We get plenty of information about their progress - especially in yrs 10 and 11 when GCSEs are approaching - but sets aren't really relevant IMO. It's very different from primary
Dcs school explained all about the bands at the introduction evening. There are 3 bands and a crossover band. Then on timetable they are further split into 3 sets per band. It is quite easy to work out where they are.
I agree with you titchy. It was another poster who said parents should be kept in the dark and it was none of their business.
I think parents should be told everything they wish to know about a child's time at school as long as it does not breach anyone else's confidentiality.
I am sure the motivation for a lot of schools keeping things quiet is that they suspect parents are clueless about levels and will only complain if they tell them about sets. It is kept quiet to avoid conflict and complaints but of course parents should know.
....and although I haven't questioned sets - I have absolutely insisted (in writing - because a verbal request was refused) on having access to my child's school file. The primary school had a policy of doing optional SATS but not divulging the results. I wanted to know the results as is my right as a parent. I dont particularly think optional SATS have --anymuch value but it was the principle of making children sit the bloody things and then treating parents like idiots by telling us we had no need to know the outcome since it wouldnt mean anything to us anyway.
Again I didn't want anyone else's results, I fully understood the levelling system and its limitations, I wasnt looking to take anyone to task over whatever the results may have shown I just wanted to be told this information about my child. The school had a policy of not telling because parents get so uptight about the results and they assume all parents are either clueless or so obsessed that theyll storm in to argue that a 3a should be bumped up to a 4c!
If our school had sets and we weren't told which set children were in, I would insist on being given this information about my child - not to argue over or obsess about - but because it is my child, education is a partnership and parents should not be kept in the dark.
Tiggytape - I completely agree with you. I also see my childs' education as a partnership between school and home - as stipulated in their organisers, for God's sake! - and I don't give a monkeys about Hannah down the road or Ben whose come from the private school, I would just like a leeeetle info about my child.
but how would know what set they were in affect that?
surely more important is that whatever set they are in, the classes are at the appropriate level for your DC
the kids always know, even if they choose not to tell you
and its usually written on the front of their exercise books
it can have consequences - my friend was told her daughter should be moved up a set, it didn't happen; friend didn't want to be interfering pushy parent. result - daughter couldn't get higher than C but needed B for college, so had to PAY to redo it at evening class. pita
Yes, JuliaScurr, our local school with the top half and bottom half has the same issue. I know that if you are in the bottom half, the highest you can go for in maths is a Grade C - they won't be taught any higher - written off in Yr9 which is when they start their GCSEs. On a positive note, my friend's son at another school was in Set 2 for maths all the way through and achieved an A* which many in top Set didn't achieve.
TalkinPeace2 - schools may well think it is no benefit in parents knowing which set their child is in (or what mark they got on a maths paper in Year 4 or whatever else they decide not to disclose) but that's not the point.
If there is no confidentiality issue, and if a parent wants to know, they should be told (and indeed the school must comply if the parent insists)
It isn't about the school deciding what it is useful or not useful for a parent to to be told. It is about a parent's right to have that information and to be included as a part of the picture in their child's life and education.
As it happens, my DS's school has told us his sets. If they hadn't I would have insisted that they did.
They seem quite keen on sharing and do treat parents as sensible people who know what that information represents and how much importance to attach to it.
We have also been told us his current NC levels and predicted sub levels all the way up to Year 9. This is after half a term in year 7 so of course I don't take this information as gospel or a cast iron guarantee of where he'll be each year. I know it is computer generated guess work but I still want to know it anyway just because I am his mum.
Join the discussion
Please login first.