Mumsnet has not checked the qualifications of anyone posting here. If you need help urgently, please see our domestic violence webguide and/or relationships webguide, which can point you to expert advice and support.
ZOMBIE THREAD ALERT: This thread hasn't been posted on for a while.
Asking a man out - why does it never work long-tern for me?(43 Posts)
Quite a trivial issue, but I'd appreciate to hear others' experiences, and maybe also what am I doing wrong. If you find this self-indulgent - sorry, but this is my (single for two yrs) life... and I want a partner, feel ready for it.
I'm quite passionate by nature, and if I like a man (which isn't that often lately) I tend to have no patience whatsoever, and although I do hold back a little, I mainly tend to show interest and if I'm not being asked out fast, I do it myself - literally I find waiting pointless and boring. Often, if a guy's single, he'd come on a date, in the past I had some flings starting like this, but invariably this never leads to a long relationship. With those who asked me out, or those where I felt strong enough to grit my teeth until he asked me, it did develop into relationships.
I often hear that The Rules are nonsense, and also read on MN that some women asked a man out and lived happily ever after. I'm just wondering what ELSE have they done after this, that I'm not doing right.
I'm posting now because guess what - I'm itching to ask someone out who I know for sure likes me, but I have no idea whether he's single, and can't just ask until I know he's interested in dating. I've only just met him, twice, but we really have fallen into these long enjoyable chats where we don't really want to stop, all this in work-related place, but we don't work together. He also lingers gazing at me, and I kept the eye contact for a while too. There is also e-mailing, slightly more than necessary.
The odd thing is, he mentioned in an e-mail that I 'might need a drink' next time he sees me (for my effort with something) which I assumed was a subtle invite - I said 'yes, I think I will need one', and was hoping that he'll suggest to go out for coffee after my visit, or at least offer me a drink at his office, but when i turned up he never mentioned it even though again we've fallen into a long chat. He stood really close to me, personal space not social. I'm worried he's a married randy older guy. But as I do like him a lot, I want to know for sure. If he's single, why the heck not just ask me out, or follow up on that drink comment? What's wrong with men that they're so slow and unconfident? I hope he's not married as he has been quite flirty and seemed not to mind that colleagues see him chatting to me for yons - they all king of looked and smiled the first time round when he stayed behing with me at the closing hour. So should I ask him out?
It never worked before for me, so am very jaded about it, but I just can't sit and wait for weeks till he gathers courage, while it's clear to me there is attraction. Should add that I really am not looking for casual sex, I like him as we seem to be on same wavelength. He is however older than me, I'm guessing 15yrs or so. Would an older man expect a woman to initiate, as possibly he asumes I'm just being friendly? I thought I won't ask a man out ever again as it never worked, but should I in this case - OR should I just control myself and let him lead the way?? Just fed up with being clueless at dating. Thanks if you've read the whole thing!
Message withdrawn at poster's request.
Told you he was married.....
OP you don't sound very worldly wise at all.
The script he's given you could have been lifted from 'Midlife Affairs Weekly' because there's every hackneyed old cliche there from any bloke who's ever had an affair.
The spark hasn't been there for years. Check. (But 25 is taking the piss)
The spark was never really there. Check.
We're like sister and brother. Check.
If my wife had an affair it wouldn't bother me. Check.
I'd like to be friends. Check.
What does he want? An affair. He was never looking for friendship.
The only reason he hasn't had an affair before is that either he didn't want one or he never found anyone daft enough to have him.
Now he's rubbing his hands together at his luck that he's found the last chance saloon for a bit of fun that he'll never have to pay for, by leaving his (probably fine) marriage.
Don't be friends with this bloke. That's not what this was ever about for either of you. You're just a midlife ego boost to a bloke who's probably feeling that the days of wine and roses are over. That's all.
...very sorry allaflutter, that's not a good outcome for you. But hey, you were patient, you didn't take the initiative, and he did make a move: which is something to consider when you find another man you like.
You're right to go no further with this, as it would only lead to unhappiness. IMO he has had affairs before and has told you a tall story.. mentioning free time on odd afternoons sounds mightily like 'how about something on the side, are you game?' to me. I doubt if he'd openly say he was looking for a mistress.
A good man would have discreetly mentioned a wife long before now. Men aren't blind - they know if we like them
He's never had affairs, no spark with his wife, let's be friends?
OP, you go on doing what you're doing. I don't mean desperately fling yourself at a man and force things and so on. But I made it very clear to my partner that I wanted him and I wanted him NOW and we've been together for forever. It didn't put him off. If they are right for you, you will just be honest and natural together.
thanks all! I don't know why would he rubbing his hands with glee - yes, I like hom but I'm not going to sleep with him. badinage I did question him when he said there was no spark and no affairs - did say I find it hard to believe, especially as he seemed quite at ease with me, not embarassed or stressed about going for a drink. So really he seems a little practiced. That said, I don't think he's a womaniser, he's generally very open and chatty with people and they like him, but he's not some charasmatic guy who women fall for in big numbers. He's quite naive in a way, and yes it cou-uld be true he had no affairs, as also had health problems few years ago. At best he is just after a bit of chat and fantasy. At worst possibly did have an affair before but not confessing (well, he only just met me tbh).
When I said he was unworldly, I meant he did mention his wife quite a bit, and generally not in a negative way. I had married/attached men coming on to me in the past, and they really try not to mention the wife - why would you? If a woman wanted to be an OW she wouldn't want sitting there talking about his wife. He mentioned her home country, her personality, her hair colour,the only negative as such was that they don't share many interests... talked about his son a lot. This what made me think we could have a light friendship, and that he is a bit eccentric if anything. On the other hand he is very intelliegent generally speaking, so yes, it's best to be cautious about his motives.
To be fair I do have a friend (long standing) who was after an affair for a while, but I didn't go there, and after a very bumpy period when he was upset, we did become friends. He did tell me early on he would like a mistress (genuinely in his case, no sex with wife for about 7 years and it's semi-open, I met her btw). But I understand that this is unusual. He does generally stay friends with his exes, and wife ok with that, and has many female friends, but don't think it's the case with this guy.
Mechanical good to hear that it worked for you! I kind of also think that it all depends on personalities, and some men really prefer leadership from women. I think I personally will stay a bit cautious with this, unless I blatantly see that the guy is very shy. Did you just grabbed and kissed him then ?
wordy you are right, in a way it gave me a boost, haven't been asked for ages, only on dating sites which is not the same as they don't see you or know you (I rarely go). So yes, even though he's not an option, I feel I may be not too hopeless in real life dating, it's nice to be asked out directly.
btw, I don't think 'no spark' means no sex as such. Lots of couples with no emotional/passionate spark have occasional sex, but it's not very passionate. So I assumed that of course they were not sexless for the whole of 25 yrs, just not for a while. It does amaze me peole live for years like that. He says they don't have much to talk about in the evenings, live like siblings, but that he has a strong sense of duty to care for the wife unless she ups and leaves first. All weird to me, I'm too modern I suppose, couldn't stay in a dull relationship. I think older men are scared of being single tbh.
The important bit of your op is the mention about being impatient. What you have done this time is ask MN, found out if he is attached, then been able to make rational decisions about it, which is a good way to go, and all before jumping into bed with him.
Why being 'impatient and passionate' gets you nowhere and gets you hurt after, is that you find out all the bad stuff about each other after the physical bit has happened and clouded the judgement about what to do.
Get to know a person before jumping in is always the best way to go, the passion will still be there with the right person further down the line, and rectifying a mistake is so much easier to deal with when you haven't yet been physical.
yes, that's true best, and I'm learning. it's against my nature (well not so much now that I'm older, I now look for personality match first of all) but I do end up feeling better and more confident when I manage to restain myself. I used to be hopeless in my 20s/early 30s, and did get hurt every single time after jumping into sex with men. NOw it's less of a physical impatience but more fantasising very quickly about the future and living with a guy, as I do want a relationship. My mind runs away with me, when I see someone compatible in interests and personality, and is reasonably attractive, easy to picture a life with. As I say, it's time something good happened after two years and a couple of mistakes right before then. I do feel a bit deflated as he came close to being a 'candidate', but I'm not cut oyt at all to be an OW, apart from moral reasons. Either we are together, or we are not, don't want anything hazy, or being secondary. I think being OW is very much being controlled by a man, fitting in his life when convenient to HIM.
I think he made the first mice, he thinks I made the first move. He is very self confident, at least outwardly, and likes women who are the same. I think if you hang around being sappy and following stupid rules, you shouldn't be surprised if you end up with someone you're not actually compatible with, and who wants you to be compliant in the rest of your relationship.
look it's simple - if a bloke likes you and is single he'll ask you out.
if he's not asking you out he's either 1) married or in a relationship or 2) not that interested.
even shy men who don't like being rejected etc end up asking people out if they like them enough.
OP you do sound a bit like you'd take any man at the mo- just take time to develop your own interests and friendships and you'll meet someone quite naturally and attract decent people. 2 years is not that long to be single tbh. Just forget all about this guy and back right off. His jaded lines are bullshit and from his colleagues' 'looks' you're most probably not the first. No doubt his wife is oblivious to their
made up marriage 'problems'
"made the first mice" - MOVE, obv.
Men, on the whole, don't like 'full on' and dare I say aggressive women. Some do of course but most don't I don't care ho the media tells us society has moved on, men like to do the asking at their own pace. A pushy woman is seen as needy at best and a bit of disposable meat at worst.
And I shall be shot for quaint and old fashioned attitudes, but 'hooking' a bloke you like is a skill. Bull in a china siop generally doesnt have the desired effect. Softly softly catchee monkey as they say
I'd rephrase that and say that "sexist and misogynist men and women don't like assertive women. They call assertiveness 'aggression' or 'pushiness' whereas similar behaviour in men would be called 'assertiveness' and 'going for what he wants'"
So if you actually want to 'hook' a man like that, you'll get a whole load of sexism and misogyny into the bargain, so be careful what you wish for.
What badinage said.
At least I know that my partner is not going to turn around and ask me to be less vociferous in my opinions. He knew what he was getting from the start - many lesser men have fled for the hills, and a bloody good job, too.
You can legislate in a breath - evolution takes a lot longer. In the conquest for 'equality' women have forgotten how to be canny.
Men don't buy the cow when the milk is free.
FWIW I am incerdibly assertive and I always get what I want - but then I also know how to play the game - be that personally or politically at work. Bolshy gets no one anywhere.
"Men don't buy the cow when the milk is free."
My man did. How do you square that circle?
I think it is sensible to hold fire not because of some outdated notion of the man being the pursuer, but for your own benefit, to protect yourself both physically and emotionally until you know for sure what the person is all about. This is what you have done this time, and thank goodness for that, as he's no catch, that's for sure with his lines about his loveless marriage (why not finish it then after 25 years if it's so boring?) You are younger, undoubtedly prettier, and it probably felt fun to flirt with you. But luckily you found out he's not available which means you can still find someone nice rather than wasting emotional energy into a no-go situation.
If you want to find out if someone is good enough for you, you need a little while to find out, meet them a few times, meet their friends, perhaps hear about how they work/cope with stress/have fun. Throwing yourself at people (and I don't mean sexually, who cares if you have sex straight away, I'm talking about emotional incontinence here) without checking the person is 'one of the good guys' and also free and wants to build a long term relationship is guaranteed heartache and disaster.
I've never needed to be 'bought' myself and I've never needed to be 'canny' in relationships. Just straight with people. It's served me very well. People know where they stand with me. And assertiveness isn't about 'getting what you want'. It's about getting your own needs met without trampling over others' rights and needs.
Women who play games aren't assertive. They are manipulative, which is something entirely different. It's a form of passive-aggression.
Join the discussion
Please login first.