Trying to exchange on leasehold flat (we currently rent) and feeling frustrated as it should have really been done by now but bitty little issues keep coming up. Our solicitor is good (I think) and picks up on everything but vendors' solicitor keep implying she is being obstructive. Examples:
- vendors made an alteration to the flat they didn't get the freeholders consent for. Our solicitor says they need to get retrospective permission. They say they don't.
- our solicitor says a deed of variation needs to be sorted regarding an extension of the lease. Their solicitor has asked the freeholder about this who has said it's not needed. Our solicitor disagrees and says it is.
- buildings insurance: only the renewal quote was provided and not the actual policy.
- up to date office copy entries not provided. Vendors solicitor saying they are not needed. Our solicitor saying she can't recommend mortgage company lend without them.
How normal is this quibbling between solicitors? I know she is acting in our best interests and I'm grateful but the whole thing is very stressful!!