class sizes to be allowed over thirty, what do we think?

(42 Posts)

Did anyone see this seems to have slid out yesterday afternoon? there's an article in yesterday's guardian I need to try and do a link on my phone back in a moment.I'm not sure the undersized rooms in my dcs school could fit many more children

Myliferocks Sat 13-Apr-13 09:16:07

My DC were never in classes of 30 or less in their infant school so it wouldn't matter where we live.

MissAnnersley Sat 13-Apr-13 09:18:35

I teach 33 pupils at the moment.

Only with at least 2 TA's <like that's going to happen>

MissA Do you have any support with that size class?

I don't think the infant classes have gone over thirty around here yet.I can see it will help friends with twins this year hopefully. there doesn't seem to be any detail on how it would be managed.

I still don't think there is physically room in older schools classrooms for? three adults and ? up to 33/34 doesn't say how far they are going to push it.

MissAnnersley Sat 13-Apr-13 09:31:25

I have a classroom assistant for 45 minutes a week.

However it is an older class.

It's fairly normal where I am.

mrz Sat 13-Apr-13 09:32:15
CouthySaysEatChoccyEggs Sat 13-Apr-13 09:35:58

It's normal here for classes to run at 30/31 in the infants (depending on successful appeals).

Very few classes are under 30. In fact my DD was in a mixed Y1/Y2 class, with no TA, with 36 other DC's, so she was the 37th DC in the class.

There was so little room in the classroom that there was 7 DC on each 6-seat table and the teacher had no desk to allow for extra tables, and there was no carpet for them to have carpet time either.

37 is too many.

31/32, possible to cope with if there are at least floating TA's, and no DC's with SN in the class. If there are DC's with SN in the class, then anything over 30 is too many!

RustyBear Sat 13-Apr-13 09:36:14

It's not all that long ago that the infant class size limit was imposed - DD's cohort of 65 over two classes was one of the last, and she's now 23 - so most older schools will have had larger classes in them before.

thank you mrz

VivaLeBeaver Sat 13-Apr-13 09:37:24

Part of me thinks its a cheap way for the government to sort out the lack of primary school places in some areas. Rather than spending money and building new classrooms or new schools. We have a booming birth rate so this isn't going to go away.

I suppose some people will be happy if it means their kids are more likely to get into their school of choice if they were borderline catchment. But parents well in the catchment area will be annoyed that their kids will be in bigger classes.

We used to manage with bigger classes when I was a kid. But now I suppose there's more targets, etc that schools are meant to be working towards improving levels.

I grew up in primary there were 40 in our class with no ta and very little special ed provision.I did fine.I wasangry several years ago when my dad told me that at least five of the kids in my class arrived at his secondary unable to read write our do back maths.children fell through the cracks.

maybe I didn't do so well after allwink " out do basic maths"

mrz Sat 13-Apr-13 09:44:34

Many LEAs are facing a shortfall in school places and this is obviously a quick fix when recommendations are that class sizes should be reduced for the very youngest children but the article talks of classes of 31 or 32 not huge increases in numbers. As a teacher IMHE there really isn't a huge difference between teaching 30 or 31

i'm guessing this is about forcing schools, such as the one my son is at, who limit their intake to 30 in each class, to take more that they don't want to take. some schools already do take more but those who don't will be forced to presumably.

his is a village school where people from well out of the catchment apply but only get in if there are spaces left that year. if they make larger classes the norm then schools won't have the option?

ds's classroom is tiny this year and they are year one's so it is quite a shock from them after the free ranging space of reception. they want to be able to emulate reception for the first term with activities going on around the edge of the room and children gradually getting used to spending more time sat on their tables working. that is near impossible in his tiddly room though even with 30.

I think it should help locally, village school those who have been number crunching reckon slightly short on places for "local"children. School seldom "full" and a decent drive to next nearest school which are unlikely to have places.

ds year 3 and has 39 in his and theres a TA who officially is for the 6 children with s@l problems ( including my ds) but she ends up being used for whole class

but in younger years more than 30 as only school in the area

beginning to think we're quite lucky. classes are 30 kids and each has a dedicated TA. only year one but both reception and this year that has been the case. think the TA is a genuine TA rather than learning support for a specific child.

AuntieStella Sat 13-Apr-13 10:01:01

Older school buildings are the ones that will cope - the 30 limit is fairly recent, and there were 40 (no TA) in my junior school.

It's a step to cope with the numbers crisis, I suppose. Many LAs know they will have a shortfall (huge in some places, especially those which were selling off 'surplus' school buildings in the 00s when scale of migration was becoming apparent).

There just isn't the public money to build enough new school in the right places and in time. And these children need to go somewhere - class sizes of 32ish won't prejudice the education and, together with bulge classes (if any schools are left with save for more prefabs), might keep numbers manageable.

depends where the school is auntie. just because there were bigger classes in theory doesn't mean there were more than 30 kids in what was once a small village so the classes were built small iyswim.

yes swallowed, our school is a sixties build and I have heard the head say the classes are considered "undersized"'. They certainly seem much smaller than I recall in my brand new eighties primary but then I'm a lot biggergrin .kids seem crammed into dds year one class.

BettyandDon Sat 13-Apr-13 10:09:08

Sounds confusing to be honest. Who decides if a school should take more than 30 per class. Surely parents would be in favour if preferred school is oversubscribed and therefore more chance of their children getting a place.

How annoyed would you be though if you were 1st on the waiting list, yet other schools have over 30 in their classes?

Minefield I think.

mrz Sat 13-Apr-13 10:17:03

I think the difference is that in the past young children were much more static in the classroom and schools didn't have to fit in as many activity areas - sand trays, role play etc.
Generally older (pre 60s) schools have bigger classrooms but I would think class numbers will still be restricted by the size of the room.

RaspberryLemonPavlova Sat 13-Apr-13 10:27:08

I don't think this is competetely new though, is it not part of the new admissions code which takes effect from this September, and had been part of in-year admissions for the last year?

lljkk Sat 13-Apr-13 10:28:34

It's not changing much, just from 30 to 31 or 32. DS had a yr1 class of 31, he coped.

DC school has class sizes the same as national average for state schools, about 26 but sometimes down to 22 (DD's y3 class, and current y6 class).

tiggytape Sat 13-Apr-13 13:13:58

The only thing changing is the rule that an extra teacher needs to be employed if a class is above numbers for a year.
It has always been the case that classes can go over 30 in exceptional circumstances as the article says.
However, when they did, it was only allowed to stay like that for a year before an extra qualified teacher had to be employed.
Now they can stay above the official numbers without this extra teacher but the 'exceptional circumstances' that allow larger classes have always existed.

admission Sat 13-Apr-13 21:47:41

This is ridiculous press gossip, being fuelled by the problems that do exist.
The bottom line is that legally the maximum number of infant pupils that can be with one school teacher is 30, that has been the law since 1998 act. It does not stop the class having more than 30 pupils, what it means is that if thee are more than 30 in the class then there has to be two teachers. As Tiggytape says there are exceptional circumstances by which the class can be more than 30 but not having enough school places is not one of them for a normal year of entry to the school.
There are all sorts of reasons why this is becoming more of a problem but what has not been resolved properly is how the new schools that are needed will be funded and built. It is no use the government saying that there will be 190,000 extra school places in SEptember, if a significant number of them are secondary school places when the level of pupils across secondary schools is currently dropping - that will be the crisis point i 10 years time, not now.

Mrsrobertduvall Sun 14-Apr-13 08:30:13

There were on average 42 children in my 1960s infants and junior classes.
No TAs.

Jaynebxl Sun 14-Apr-13 08:40:23

Definitely in our area you can't get more than 30 in a class unless it goes through appeal at the county, and even then almost all appeals fail.

Having taught mainstream classes of 30 as well as classes abroad of less than 20 I have always felt that the single biggest contributing factor to improving standards in schools is class size. Actually it would probably be completely changing some children's family situations but that's out of our hands!

CouthySaysEatChoccyEggs Sun 14-Apr-13 08:45:36

Admission - the crisis point in some areas will come far sooner than in 10 years time. The crisis point in my town is going to cone in September 2015, for both Primary and Secondary at the same time.

We will be 157 places short in my end of town for Primary, and 45 short in the other end of town - so nowhere to even send the DC's from this end of town.

These are pupils that will not get a Reception place in our town at all. The current solution (as the new primary is delayed and will now not be open on time) is to taxi these 4yo's, without their parents, to the next town over, 30 miles away, to 2 schools in Special Measures...

And for Secondary, our town will be 120 places short in my end of the town, and 50 short in the other end.

There is meant to be a new Secondary opening, as a second site of an existing school - but it's also running late and won't be open in time for the 2015 intake.

They haven't come up with a solution for this yet...

Why does this bother me, and why am I so interested in these facts? Because DS2 goes into Y7 in September 2015, and DS3 starts Reception at the same time...

And if you want to talk about placement shortages, there are already estimates that our town will be 70 places short for DC's requiring placement at SN school...

So should be great fun for everyone.

I accept that in 10 years time, there will be another massive shortfall of Secondary places, to allow for those born in the 2010-2011 Academic year, but it's not the immediate concern in my town!!

BoffinMum Sun 14-Apr-13 08:55:40

You can have enormous classes, but you need to sit children in rows and hit them if they don't comply with instructions. They will also need to spend a lot of time on routinised tasks. It's called a factory model for learning.

mrz Sun 14-Apr-13 09:00:36

In my area two secondary schools have merged and a new school built in a central location to replace them ... for some reason the new school can accommodate fewer students than either of the old schools so creating an immediate shortfall.
The main secondary school where I teach has also been rebuilt much smaller than the previous school so is already at capacity.

Jaynebxl Sun 14-Apr-13 09:03:30

Boffin shhhh! Don't give anyone ideas!

amidaiwish Sun 14-Apr-13 09:13:01

I think it's shocking. This year 31,32 which will creep up and up.
Even 30 is too many with a TA every morning in DD2's yr2 class and no (official) SN though there's about 6 kids who need a LOT of support and the likes of DD2 get left to get on with it by herself. Am close to telling the HT that on Fridays DD2 will not attend school as it is not feasible for me to get all the work covered out of school hours!

mrz Sun 14-Apr-13 09:14:05
tiggytape Sun 14-Apr-13 09:20:21

They can only go above 30 per class (in YR - Y2) in exceptional cases eg where a child should have got a place but the council stuffed up their application. This has been the situation for years and hasn't changed. The law restricting YR-Y2 classes to 30 still stands.

Basically nothing has changed except the obligation to employ an extra qualified teacher in Year 1 if the reception class still has more than 30 chidlren in it at that stage. They used to have to do this. Now they don't.

I do agree though - the shortage of places for primary (and secondary too in some areas) is awful. However councils will have to deal with that as they have always done. Hopefully through long term planning to provide more permanent places and also through bulge classes and sending children to schools further away from home.

There is no provision to just sneak one or two children into every reception class to make up for the shortage of primary places.

insanityscratching Sun 14-Apr-13 09:40:14

mrz we have exactly the same experience in our area, LA merged two schools and are building a new school (opens September) but the new school accommodates only two thirds of the pupils it is supposed to be serving (those currently housed in the two schools) The only other school feasible is already 100 plus over numbers. I can't quite get the reasoning behind it tbh.

BoffinMum Sun 14-Apr-13 09:50:25

Classes of 70? Learning more?

Learning more what, exactly?

How to queue? How to copy things down? How to teach peers in the absence of a qualified member of staff? How to cope in a bustling learning environment with the ambience of an airport departure lounge? How to sit in wet or dirty pants all day in the absence of age appropriate personal care?


tiggytape Sun 14-Apr-13 10:51:23

If you read the article - there are 2 teachers and the size of the class is 60-70 (so there are actually 30-35 children per teacher which is the same ration as any other school for Y3-Y6)

Some schools do this in reception too - they have a huge open area and mix 2 or 3 classes (so up to 90 pupils in total) with 3 qualified staff and allow free movement with small groups for teaching.
Some schools mix Early Years provision and reception so have upto 120 children in one class with 4 teachers plus TAs.
As long as the staff ratio is correct (30 children per qualified teacher for YR-Y2) this is perfectly allowed and even considered good practice by some.

Of course though it works better in schools that are purpose built for this arrangement as some new schools are.

mrz Sun 14-Apr-13 11:00:01

Many years ago when we first set up an Early Years Unit the consensus was that 60 children per setting was the optimal size IMHO this is still the case regardless of staffing levels.

Loa Sun 14-Apr-13 11:15:23

DS reception last year was supposed to be 60 places two teachers - thanks to appeals it was 65.

DS was in the larger reception class of 33 - he made little progress - we weren't the only parents worried about that - and we felt his teacher didn't know him at all making bland generic statements about him that know one else recognized. There were two TA in his class.

Yr 1 fair few DC left before he in a class of 29 and has one TA I think mainly assigned to one DC - his teacher knows him well and he was identified for small amount of extra help and he gone from being below the average targets to being above.

Obviously I can't say its the class size rather than other things but I do think if you have a quiet well behaved DC in a large class they are the ones that are going be missed and the longer it goes on the harder for them to catch up.

Join the discussion

Join the discussion

Registering is free, easy, and means you can join in the discussion, get discounts, win prizes and lots more.

Register now