class of 45 in reception with 2 teachers?(44 Posts)
Just that reall, how will that work?
My DS is off to reception in September with a class of 45 with 2 teachers...
Won't that just be horrendous?
I really don't understand.
It's an old school...1960s so I can't see it's going to have mod cons like sliding screens and that.
I'll reserve judgement until I see it in action.
I think it can depend on the physical space, the acoustics and the planning. There are purpose built open plan classrooms in some schools with sliding screens, quiet areas and well thought out layouts to ensure free movement and effective small group teaching.
If it is entirely open plan then noise and distraction can be an issue but in this instance may be countered by having only 45 children instead of the 60 youd expect with 2 teachers.
It seems to be a very popular way to arrange things for reception classes now and even the schools that dont officially have open plan space seem to be doing a lot more communal work with all classes mixing and all teachers working together more often.
I will just have to see how it goes with DS in Sept...
I'm not so worried about how his education is tailored specifically to his abilities to trade off a smaller amount of kids in a room. (but we have no 'choice' as this is the only place offered)
To me, playing and making friends and learning to be confident in his own skin is much more important than reading or writing at this stage.
The formal stuff will come, he's a bright boy.
I just don't want him to be stressed in a noisy and impersonal environment...
Obviously, it could be all fine. I'm just worried
OP small classes are generally considered to be good because of the staff:pupil ratio.
In the situation you describe the ratio is actually better than a standard of 1 teacher and 1 TA to 30 pupils.
For me it all hinges in the competency of the staff and the design of the room. In principle it sounds like a good idea.
Ds2's infant school is like this but the reception area has 3 classes of about 34 each in - there's a big shared area and each class has a little bit sectioned off as a base area.
It gets worse for years 1 and 2 though - they are in one long room with a bug shared area in the middle with all the desks in, base areas along one side (just big enough for them to sit down on the carpet, a cupboard for the teacher) and things like the library and a messy art area and store cupboards on the other side. There's barely enough space to get all the desks in and seems horribly crowded and noisy to me but it's all they know and what they are used to so they just get on with it. But almost 200 kids plus staff in a room plus staff - not sure I could stand it week in week out!
My dd was in a class room of 45 with two teachers in one room when in reception. There were two separate classes and they had separate parts of the room for certain things e.g. register, stories, pe but were mixed up for others. It seemed to work ok and it didn't seem to affect dd in any way, it was just what she knew. although there are more children in a room together the class ratio is less than in most schools. It think the reason for it was lack of classrooms.
It's too many imho.
Ds1 started school somewhere with 90 children + and there were 3 teachers/TAs I think, you could never get hold of them to talk to either before or after school, they took children out of class in small groups just to meet legal requirements, ds never ate his lunch, didn't have a drink all day, or go to the loo and he got his head bashed on the ground by some of the other kids, supervision was hopelessly inadequate.
We switched schools and ds2's experience of reception was fecking marvellous compared to that. The little ones NEED more help. I wouldn't send a child there - sorry OP
My Mum is a TA in a reception class like this. There are 90 children with three teachers and 4 TAs. She was cynical when it started but it has worked well. The children all know which teacher they 'belong' to and the reception classroom is actually three linked rooms plus outdoor space. There are times each day where the children work in classes of 30 with their teacher and other times when it is free flow. The TAs have lists each day of the children for reading and small group work so no one is forgotten.
I think the last paragraph of Periwinkle's post explains it well. Basically if you have 2 classrooms and 2 teachers with 23 kids in each classroom, the children are always divided in that way. If you have 2 teachers and 45 kids then it is more flexible - they can be split in any number of ways depending on what seems most appropriate at that time.
that's good Simpson.
I guess i just wanted to understand the theory behind it...
Honestly I was you this time last year (really worried about how it would work) especially as DD is very bright and I thought this would be neglected however I could not have been happier she has truly thrived and there are more adults in the classroom which she loves especially like today where the theme was "India" and the teachers were wearing saris.
DS2 has just finished P1 in Scotland, and had 50 in his class with two teachers.
I wasn't sure about it, but it seems to work as the school do it every year with P1. They have a big double classroom.
or perhaps they would be one pure reception class and one mixed reception/Y1 class ... there are lots of ways to organise classes.
Just wanted to know what the advantages are?
We are always told big class sizes=bad
When did that all change?
but if they were divided in to 2 classes there would still be the same adult to child ratio wouldn't there?
They are still taught about "classroom voices" etc and no running inside so it does not seem any louder than a class of 30 (impression from the few times I have been in there).
There are more adults to take small groups away from the rest, more action stations (or not more maybe but bigger) because there is more room.
How are they? I'm not thinking about ratios, just the sheer amount of kids in one room.
It must be overwhelming for a 4 year old who is only used to being with a few people at a time.
I just want to understand the logic of it.
I think the benefits would be that the groups can be very flexible.
For example if you have 2 classes of 23 each you may have 3 children needing support with something in each class, not really enought to justify the resources for a whole separate group in each class BUT put the classes together you get a group of 6 and the staff can be made better use of.
Staff time is at a premium in schools and I think this system is set up to try and make the best use of it.
They are actually in smaller groups if you think about it.
mrz, why is that a good way to work can you explain? What are the benefits for children to be in these large groups?
It's quite common to work that way. We combine 26 nursery with 30 reception (2 teachers and 2 nursery nurses)
We looked at 3 schools (daughter is now just finishing reception) and 2 of them did this.
In one school it seemed VERY chaotic and very loud, the other had a much bigger room, purpose built with this in mind I would guess, so a lot more space, more defined areas within it and it actually was really good. It was loud but I don't think it was any more so than the school that had 2 separate classes of 30.
my daughter is at the one with 2 separate classes (it was the nearest) and they still often put them all in together for things.
when I was at that age I think we had about 26/27 in the class (and there was only a single class in each year) so to me 60 in one room is big and busy but I think it is more and more common and as they get older I wouldn't be surprised if they start doing lessons in bigger classes anyway.
I think in many ways having them mixed up means groups can be more fluid which is probably much better for the children. As they go through the year then those who are at each different level or struggling with the same things or excelling in the same things can be grouped together very easily but also these groups can be changed very quickly as children grasp different concepts. This happens in classes anyway but with more children it is much more likely they will always end up with more than 1 at a similar level rather than anyone being the odd one out if that makes sense.
In our infant school it worked because it meant reception had a big class room and a secluded play ground they turned into an outdoor learning zone. It was perfect for play based learning.
The other classes were Y1, Y1/2, Y2
The school is an old building with not much space for expanding.
It just seems to be the new way that quite a few schools are running the reception classes now.
I had no choice really as to where DD went as she has an older brother in yr3. And I was not happy to hear that her reception class was being done like this.
When DS was in reception it was done in the traditional way ie separate classroom, 30 kids with 1 teacher.
But in fairness I could not be happier with the year she has had.
Join the discussion
Please login first.