I think I may have asked about this before, not sure, anyway there is a new part to the story now...
While pregnant with DS1, I had to have Anti-D at (I think) 14 weeks, 28 weeks and after the birth.
Had nothing with DS2, MW said they no longer recommended it.
I had a MC in January, and am now 27 weeks pregnant with DS3, and have had a letter through to say I have to have the Anti-D at 28 weeks. So why do I need it now, when I didn't before? And if I was supposed to have it with DS2 and at 14 weeks with this one, why didn't I have it then? I had a large bleed in this pregnancy at 7 weeks and there was no mention of having the Anti-D then either.
Certainly not looking to blame anyone for the MC, I know it is just something that can happen, but did not having the Anti-D in DS2's pregnancy have an effect on the MC?
Sorry for all of the questions, just can't get it straight in my head, nothing new there
Please or to access all these features
Please
or
to access all these features
Get updates on how your baby develops, your body changes, and what you can expect during each week of your pregnancy by signing up to the Mumsnet Pregnancy Newsletters.
Pregnancy
Questions about Anti-D
11 replies
NatalieJaneIsPregnantAgain · 07/10/2008 11:36
OP posts:
Please create an account
To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.