So have just had my 34 week scan for my second baby and been told that they want me to have weekly scans because the estimated weight has changed from just above the 10 centile line to just below it (nowhere near the 5 centile line)
I'm only having to attend the scans because I had just turned 40 when I found out I was pregnant - all other things (bmi, blood pressure, glucose, blood tests, etc) are normal and the consultants, sonographers and midwifes keep asking me why am I having these scans and weirdly its me that has to tell them that they arranged them automatically and I assume its because of my age.
I don't mind the extra scans - more chances to see the baby, but it seems to me to be overly cautious. Even the consultant said that the chances are its because it was a different sonographer and I remember reading on here that the estimated weight is a really unreliable reading.
Oh and the other measures which I think are actuals - head circumference, abdomen circumference and femur length are tracking along the same centile, umbilical artery and liquor volume are virtually the same readings.
Am I right to try and play down the seriousness of being just above 10 centile to just below? (Especially to family who are probably going to freak out and go on and on about it - can't avoid them knowing about the scans because I will need them for the childcare for DS)
Any one got experience of being called back for more growth scans and how did you stop it from causing yourself more stress and anxiety, when I want to be quietly just preparing for birth?
Please or to access all these features
Please
or
to access all these features
Get updates on how your baby develops, your body changes, and what you can expect during each week of your pregnancy by signing up to the Mumsnet Pregnancy Newsletters.
Pregnancy
how reliable is the estimated weight by scan measure?
21 replies
superwormissuperstrong · 25/04/2016 21:15
OP posts:
Please create an account
To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.