NO!
It depends on your family. My family stories have stillbirths, bodily damage they did not have the tech to repair, children scarred from forceps etc' (in both sides of my family). If you had a premature baby and it died, it wasn't counted as a stillbirth until much later- loads more issues.
But in those days, you didn't argue because (a) Dr/Men knew best (b) you didn't talk about 'those bits' of you in polite company and (c) to be blunt, there was nothing they could do about some of it in those days. I remember the newspapers coming to see a girl born early up my street in the very early 80s - surviving at her gestation was big news. Now, she would be 80-90% likely to survive without significant disability.
Then, in the 70s, there was the 'natural birth movement' (my mum was into this type of movement at the time but became critical after they viewed her 'letting' the Dr support the sudden birth her premi twins', when she had PE, letting the side down) but they hadn't perfected replacing the medicalised side with other things: basically a lot of women just fiercely said "hands off" to medical staff but without much access to the exercises, yoga, water births, hypnotherapies, 'active birthing' stuff women who want a drug free birth can utilise now to prepare themselves. It was so often'trust your body and do a bit of vague, probably badly taught breathing'. But to complain would have set back a valid movement many years in terms of its message, so many women 'took one for the team' in that regard! Juju Sundan has an excellent critique of that period in her birth skills book - which is about dealing with pain naturally but fully admits it's very painful hence you need a lot of skills and even then ... if you prefer there's no shame in accepting drugs if needed.
Now, I think the internet is one big issue with births being thought of as 'tough'.
Just from anecdotal/ personal experience. Of course births go well and some not so well, but I have several friends who did one/other of the things below and are vocal about warning others not to!
Essentially, we all know if you google and google you hear what you want to hear: so if you're a pessimist you can search for botched birth stories, go in assuming your MW and Ob/Gyn are quacks and worry/question everything. If something isn't pleasant (as is likely) you'll dwell.
At the other end of the extreme, if you google Ina May sneeze birthing in a field and nothing else, you might have an extremely traumatic/scary experience (one friend of mine needed therapy and it boiled down to her denial that birth was coming) if something painful, stressful or medical happens because it is unknown. Not helped by people on the web who confuse 'spiral of intervention' with ranty 'if you go near a hospital they will ruin your birth!' comments.
Also people pay for birth prep more now and perhaps some providers are better than others? NCT varies wildly in quality. One of my friends actually got her money back from her hypnobirthing teacher when it transpired the class was not what it claimed to be.
But then again I think Dr Google does this in a lot of fields of life/health.
It would be interesting to see how it impacts on such a massive thing as birth as I mentioned, I am going purely on anecdotes from women I know.
When I speak to people, I get a mixture of 'G&A, 5 hours start to finish', to 'needed a vonteuse and stitches, was OK in the end' to 'needed an EMC'. I.e. a mixture of experiences. I don't think that has changed over the years but I do think perhaps we have gone from getting all our advice from one (possibly flawed) medical team per person to the whole web and that has impacted on expectations.