My feed
Premium

Please
or
to access all these features

Get updates on how your baby develops, your body changes, and what you can expect during each week of your pregnancy by signing up to the Mumsnet Pregnancy Newsletters.

Pregnancy

Vitamin K

7 replies

ICantGetMuchSleep · 21/10/2010 22:11

What is everyone doing about Vitamin K injection after birth?

OP posts:
Report
YorkshireTeaDrinker · 21/10/2010 23:12

I've said that I am happy to have the vitamin k injection. Baby definately needs the vitamin k and injection is the most effective way to administer it.

There has been some investigation into a possible linnk between vitamin k injections and childhood leukaemia but the evidence is inconclusive.

You can opt for an oral course of vitamin k, but this can be less effective.

If you want to opt out of vitamin k altogther then it is reccommended that you have a physiological third stage and delay the clamping of the cord.

Info on vitamin k is available in this Dept. of Health circular. It is quite old (1998) but as far as I am aware it is still current guidance.

Report
chloeb2002 · 22/10/2010 05:10

Im unsure why you wouldnt give vit K at birth.

Report
FingonTheValiant · 22/10/2010 05:53

We didn't give vit K to DS (11days). I had a physiological 3rd stage, we delayed cord clamping, and the birth was straight forward, no interventions eg forceps (which I would have given vit K after).

That said, I now have a tiny flutter of panic every now and again that something bad will happen because of it. So for any future children I would probably give oral doses for peace of mind.

Report
lurcherlover · 22/10/2010 09:07

chloe, some people are wary of it because in the 80s it was suggested that there might be a possible link between the injection and childhood leukaemia. However, this link has since been disproved by further studies. What is clear is that there is a definite link between a vitamin k deficiency and the possibility of baby bleeding to death. Personally I'm opting for the injection.

Report
MummyB2010 · 22/10/2010 09:44

I was agonising over this (DC was due 20/10 but still safely tucked up at present!) but in the end we are going to opt for the injection.

With the oral does you have to have 3 spread over the course of a month of more before enough is administered.

In my pregnancy addled worrisome brain, I just couldn't stop thinking about what if we were to have a car accident on the way home from the hospital or bubba was to have a knock before full dose of oral Vit K had been completed. All I'm sure unlikely to happen but was doing my head in, so we're opting for the injection to get it out of the way. One less thing to worry about later.

Report
missdt · 22/10/2010 11:03

We're going for the injection so that, like MummyB says, we know it's done and don't have to worry about it later.

Report
VotePedro · 22/10/2010 11:46

These are some of the reasons why you might not give it though this is a summary from 2001 and as has been said I think the research done on a link between giving Vit K and childhood cancer has been discredited www.aims.org.uk/Journal/Vol13No2/vitk.htm. We decided not to have it as very easy birth at home no trauma etc. I defo would have had it if the birth was more traumatic though.

Report
Please create an account

To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.