ZOMBIE THREAD ALERT: This thread hasn't been posted on for a while.
Job sharing for MPs(38 Posts)
Please support the campaign to allow MPs to job share. More information at www.elocalnews.org.uk.
If MPs are allowed to job share then other occupations will follow. Job sharing makes it easier for parents of children, carers and disabled people to become MPs. Please write to your MP and ask her or him to support the idea. Maria Miller MP, Minister for Disabled People, is considering the issue at the moment. She is working on a consultation paper called 'Access to elected office for disabled people' which looks at ways to increase the number of disabled people in politics.
A husband and wife could stand on a job share basis if the Bill is passed. I don't know any MPs who 'hire unpaid interns to do the bulk of the constituency work'.
The Explanatory Notes for the Bill answer a lot of questions about job sharing for MPs and can be read here: http://www.disabilitypolitics.org.uk/pdfs/enotes.pdf
The Bill itself can be read here:
Please ask your MP to attend the debate and support the Bill.
I see MPs are also pushing for a £100k a year pay packet plus expenses on top. There has been huge grumbling by MPs ever since their expenses have come under tighter scrutiny and they have constantly pushed for the rules to be relaxed and their pay and perks to be raised.
I am therefore dubious about this sudden apparent conversion to embracing family friendly policies. Any chance we might be seeing 'man and wife' MP job sharing? A lot of MPs wives act as their secretary and hence get paid all/most of the MPs allowance for staff while they hire unpaid interns to do the bulk of constituency work. I think we need to be a bit careful here. There are also going to be fewer MPs once the boundary changes happen and I can see a real danger of such an arrangement being abused.
John McDonnell MP is presenting a bill on Tuesday 20th November 2012 to seek a law change to enable MPs to job share.
A letter to The Guardian was published in September 2012 setting out some of the supporters of job sharing for MPs:
You still banging on about this? If the last one time-expired doesn't that just mean 'no-one supported it'?...
A new epetition on job sharing for MPs has been started as the first one time expired. Please sign up to support a law change to enable job sharing for MPs.
Also legal advice from the Equality and Human Rights Commission on job sharing for MPs has been posted on www.disabilitypolitics.org.uk
Ridiculous idea. How would people know who was their MP on any given time or day? Being an MP is a full-time, 24/7 job. It should not be something to be worked around child-care.
John McDonnell MP has recorded a video asking the public to contact him if they would like to be job share MPs. See:
There is no shortage of women that want to run for MP with the present working conditions. I think it's patronising to assume that women will only go for a job if they can do it part-time. I also think it's ridiculous to assume that if these 'mini MPs' were created, they would automatically be filled by female candidates... selection committees don't work that way. In business, part-time or job-sharing only works at levels where someone can hand over a fairly straightforward, repetitive task and there's not too much decision-making required. Running the country is not one of those tasks.
Caroline Lucas MP has recorded a new video supporting job sharing for MPs
- please write to your MP and ask them to support the bill
Find out what the Labour whips said to Margaret Hodge when she suggested job sharing for MPs - would she get the same response today?
see broadcast dated 30 October 2011
Please write to your MP and ask him or her to support John McDonnell's 10 minute rule bill in June 2012 to change the law to enable MPs to serve on a job share basis.
I dunno what an agent does, but the MP has to go to the constituency, have surgeries, open fetes, visit old people's homes, etc. A job-share with one person permanently based in the constituency, having responsibility for that but not having to combine it with the Westminster village
rubbish representation would be good for both job-share partners. And no worse for constituents, as MPs never represent their constituents' views in Parliament anyway.
AuntieEstablishment: surely that is what already exists, in the MP/agent arrangement. One MP as representative, but others doing the heavy lifting of the constituency work.
Could we have one locally doing the useful stuff (i.e. constituency work) and one in Westminster
playing politics doing the representative bit?
That would be good: better for the MPs' work/life balance if they're not having to work in 2 places at once.
The House of Commons Information service provided me with details of an MP who does think Cabinet posts can be job shared:
Date of Proceeding: 22.03.2011
Reference: 525 c185-6WH
Member: MacLeod, Mary
Title: Promotion of Women in Business
"My hon. Friend makes an excellent point. If there were job sharing in politics-there is no reason why the role of MP or Cabinet Minister could not involve a job share-we would show that we have made a real difference and made ground, and that there is no reason why that cannot happen in business."
Deborah451 I see the main benefit of democracy to lie with the ability of a population to rid itself of an unpopular government. In this, I may be wrong but, my observations seem to hold true of the elections which swapped Major for Blair and Brown for the current coalition. Needless to say that this principle extends to include the ability to get rid of unpopular, ineffective or otherwise crap representatives; under the British system, that would mean constituency MP's.
What if, part way through a political cycle, one half of your job share did something which meant that they wouldn't get your vote at the next election? Using a real life example, what would you do if person 1 has done a fine job, but person 2 has done the sort of thing that Chris Huhne stands accused of? How would you indicate on your ballot paper that you are still (for the purposes of the argument) a Lib-Dem supporter but don't like one half of the job share?
Also, a job share might be OK for a constituency MP, but there is no way you could have a job share cabinet minister.
John McDonnell MP is presenting a 10 Minute Rule Bill on job sharing and MPs in June 2012. Please write to your MP and ask him or her to support it.
Please Mr Pants explain what you mean in more detail and I will try and answer. How would you vote depends on the election manifesto you have presented to the electorate. If it is a conscience issue then vote according to your conscience. If two job sharing MPs disagreed on a conscience issue their votes would cancel each other out. Thus they could decide not to vote at all or choose one to vote even though the other disagreed. This is likley to be rare and does not outweigh the case for job sharing. We need more diversity in the House of Commons.
How would I vote out one half of the job share?
The vast majoirty of votes are taken on the basis of party policy so it would not matter who was in the House for any specific issue.
One reason why we need job sharing is that the House of Commons is not representative of the electorate. The House of Commons has 650 MPs. Of these 650, there are 504 male MPs, so women are under seriously under represented.
There are 27 MPs of Black and Minority Ethnic origin, but there would
need to be 55 - 60 BME MPs to be representative of the BME population.
There are only a handful of disabled MPs but there would need to be
65 disabled MPs to represent the number of disabled people in the population.
It would be easier for business people and retired members of the armed forces who are disabled to become MPs if there was job sharing.
I'm afraid I don't think this would work. Apart from anything else, it's very unlikely that it would in fact work as a classic job share in the sense of each employee working half of full time hours. MPs, despite public perceptions, work very hard, with very long hours, and the work simply expands to fill whatever time is available. In my opinion a job share post would mean that a constituency would in fact end up with 2 full time MPs representing them - ok, so they wouldn't both be able to vote, but that is not the only way that MPs can influence policy - e.g. sidling up to Ministers, working on Committees etc. So a constituency with a job share arrangement would actually be at a distinct advantage as it would have twice the MP "manpower".
Being an MP is not a job in the normal sense.
It is a representational role and one in which both the party line, but crucially also the individual conscience, plays a part in any specific vote. I would not be interested in having two half-representatives and no way of knowing who might be in the House for any specific issue.
Think job sharing allows more people access to power and careers. Being a part time mum, I feel undervalued, promotion not really an option. Women and men who share work with childcare and disabled people should have more access to decision making - so I'm for it. 2 often gets more work than one anyway.
Sir Richard Branson supports job sharing initiatives.
'Many people' think all kinds of things. Doesn't make it a better idea.
Allow MPs to serve on a job share basis is the subject of an epetition - you can sign up at http://epetitions.direct.gov.uk/petitions/17076
Join the discussion
Registering is free, easy, and means you can join in the discussion, get discounts, win prizes and lots more.Register now
Already registered with Mumsnet? Log in to leave your comment or alternatively, sign in with Facebook or Google.
Please login first.