Is resilience the most important life quality to have?(41 Posts)
What would you say is the most important quality to posess? I would say Resilience.
Summarised by Psychologies today as the following
'Resilience is that ineffable quality that allows some people to be knocked down by life and come back stronger than ever. Rather than letting failure overcome them and drain their resolve, they find a way to rise from the ashes. Psychologists have identified some of the factors that make someone resilient, among them a positive attitude, optimism, the ability to regulate emotions, and the ability to see failure as a form of helpful feedback. Even after a misfortune, blessed with such an outlook, resilient people are able to change course and soldier on.
I was thinking about it as ofsted have put teaching resilience as one of their criteria for outstanding lessons. What do you think?
Very important, but if I were to pick one it would be compassion.
I certainly think resilience is needed if we are to survive what life has to throw at us, but I would put empathy, kindness and compassion, for yourself as well as others, before it.
Yes I agree compassion is important but if you can't cope with your own life it is difficult to help others.
The problem with resilience is that it's an entirely self-directed quality. It says nothing about our ability to form relationships with other people, and our capacity to flourish within those relationships.
I would say the ability to love is the most important - the essential - quality to have.
Yes resilience is the most important.
All the others are about how you are to others: empathy/compassion/tolerance for others.
Resilience is for yourself, to cope with who you are and what life throws at you.
I'd also argue that empathy towards self is number 2. The vast majority of psych problems I see are when people have offered too much help to others - children, spouses, family at expense of self.
I think resilience is very important. Along with kindness and a sense of humour.
One can get through most things in life with these qualities.
I think resilience is very important, but as a teacher I'm wary of the idea that we have to teach it. You have to m
-- I'm surprised that the majority of psychological problems are caused by giving too much to others. That might depend on who you are looking at. The most damaged people in society have not been loved well or enough.
To model it, to allow it to develop, to make sure your classroom practice doesn't diminish it. But there's no lesson that will tick the box of teaching it, IMO.
Yes it us very difficult to teach but Ofsteds argument is that if pupils are taught to be more resilient they can cope better with life later on. Maybe then they wouldn't be such a drain on resources?
Resilience is for yourself, to cope with who you are and what life throws at you.
From my own circumstances, I cannot agree - I am extremely resilient, to the point where pretty much everything and everyone is shut out. I don't get stressed, I don't get sad, I don't get upset because as soon as there is a sense of that, I blank it out.
I am currently in therapy to break down my 'resilience' in order to form closer relationships with people. Resilience can form a barrier that is counterproductive.
empathy towards self
That's a very odd phrase, as empathy is defined as the abilities to share and understand the feelings of someone else.
niminypiminy is right on the money, I think.
I agree with their argument, on the whole, but if they've said it should be taught, they're missing something fundamental about the quality. For a start,like everything else, parenting style has a huge impact upon it. Secondly, the focus on examinations that is an inescapable part of classrooms is detrimental to resilience.
School should be a place where the development of resilience is fostered, but it can't be taught.
Maybe I'm just being pedantic.
I think the quality of "grit" (very similar to resilience) is me of the strongest predictors of life outcomes. Can't remember the study though.
This sounds like very typical psychobabble bullshit.
Human beings are designed to cling on to life.
People spout this kind of nonsense until something really bad happens to them.
I think it is far more important to teach that it doesn't count for FA what type of person you are, that sometimes, bad shit happens for no reason at all, and sometimes multiple bad shit to one person, so don't see life as some kind of bargain, 'If I am positive and optimistic, goodness and fairness will come to me.'
It doesn't work like that. So just be who you are and don't feel bad if you're not 'resilient', 'optimistic', or XYZ because really, it makes no real difference in how things pan out a lot of times.
Oh, and btw, sometimes 'soldiering on' is its own form of self-destruction.
I don't think it's nonsense or psychobabble. It's been an area of research for more than 50 years.
With respect to schools, there are children who find it very hard to cope when things go even slightly wrong, eg friendship groups break down, grades aren't what they expect. Depression and other mental health issues are on the increase amongst young people, often because they find it hard to cope with the normal ups and downs of life, never mind something really bad.
Is it not worth thinking about how we can help kids toughen up a bit?
Resilient is definitely not 'soldiering on' or putting up with awful things happening.
It's a permeable state where you recognise your own needs, your own limitations, where you can ask for help - its nowt to do with grit. It's to do with trying and believing that even if you fail you are worthwhile.
The main skill we're trying to teach our foster child is resilience because that self belief that you are able to try (even if you fail) increases her self esteem.
'Is it not worth thinking about how we can help kids toughen up a bit?'
No, because you're doing it according to the paradigm you find acceptable. People aren't paradigms anymore than life is. Telling them how to feel, 'Be resilient! Be positive! Be optimistic!' is the message that, if they can't or don't fall into the paradigm, that's a failing on their part.
There is a lot of life that is outwith our control, but that doesn't make us comfortable, so we fabricate constructs to make ourselves believe if we are X,Y, Z things will go well.
That's a crock of it. And it's a dangerous and erroneous message to give to young people.
Better to teach them that being themselves is fine, it doesn't have to be one way or another.
Resilience is absolutely about being yourself - and retaining your self even when under attack.
Non resilient children give in to peer pressure, think others are more worthwhile or more likely to be right than they are.
And then they turn into stressed and anxious adults.
There is no most important life quality to have. There is just who we are.
And it appears you have a different definition of resilience from the OP, Laurie.
Your statements are not conducive with my own experience. I am a resilient person, don't (and never really have) given in to peer pressure, but I do regard others as more worthwhile and I am not a stressed or anxious person.
Eleanor Roosevelt 's quote is probably worth repeating 1000s of times:
"No-one can make you feel inferior without your consent". People sometimes invite us to feel bad for thier own reason, but it's an invitation you can decline, and be happily resilient.
It sounds like your barrier Mittens is a very complex defence mechanism designed to protect you.
Only you will know if that is related to what you think is resilience I hope your therapy goes well.
When I said about empathy towards self I think that there are many parts of self that get neglected and that empathy needs to start with listening to our own needs that are sometimes hidden from us due to our own trauma.
expat - I don't disagree with the Psychologies definition, it's just incomplete for me. Maybe there was more?
I think resilience is about retaining your 'self' even when affected by events outside your control.
I don't often find myself telling kids how to feel, expat. I'm not sure what you think developing resilience in school would look like, but it would have to be a bit more thought out than "be optimistic!" It would more likely involve allowing them to experience failure, disappointment, and not trying to fix it for them.
Although you might not agree, I think our positions on this have some common ground: I sometimes think the kids I teach think that everything in life is within their control (or their parents', or their teachers'), that someone will always pick up the pieces. I would like their education to help them understand that that's not always the case.
Nobody's saying that being resilient will mean bad things don't happen to you. Or that you'll cope fine when they do. Neither is it being suggested that we should tell kids how to be.
I'm mulling this over, and I suppose I think the question is, 'if resilience is the most inportant quality to have, what is it important for?'. In other words, what kind of idea about human flourishing is underpinning the notion that resilience is the most imoortant quality?
One thing we might say is that this is a utilitarian view of human flourishing. Rather than asking 'what is the best quality we might possess', or 'what is the most noble quality we might possess' or 'what is the most virtuous quality we might possess', the idea of an important quality suggests that it is important for some purpose: succeeding in life, maybe; being happy; achieving your goals. For all these, I think we could agree that resilience probably is very important.
But what about if your idea of human flourishing is different: if it is to live a good life, or to live a virtuous life, or an honourable life, or a devout life? Then you will ask different questions: how can I be good? What is necessary to be virtuous? How can I behave honourably? How can I make God's will my own? And if those are your questions then you will end up with very different qualities that seem desirable.
What I am saying, I suppose, is that resilience is the the 'best' quality for a self-defined, materialistic, happiness-obsessed age. Each age finds its own ideals, and perhaps resilience is ours. But, speaking for myself, I find it a shallow and limited one.
My previous post didn't post but basically I was asking if resilience isn't the most important thing to posess, what is it that makes one person better able to cope with the same situation then another?
Resilience is important, but I think one of the most helpful qualities to cultivate is self-compassion. A lot of suffering (both that which we inflict on ourselves and that which we inflict on others) comes from a sense of dissatisfaction with ourselves or even outright self hatred. Developing self-compassion helps us to accept and recognise our own suffering without beating ourselves up and will naturally lead to developing more compassion for others.
Resilience follows on quite naturally from self compassion as it helps to avoid getting stuck in self pity (which is a more ruminative state). I think practicing mindfulness helps with developing resilience as it allows you to see things more clearly without emotions overwhelming everything.
I beg to differ, CoolWaterRose. I find that the notion of 'self-compassion' is mainly useful for keeping intact the web of self-justifications and excuses we have for our own actions. The idea that if we were only a bit kinder to ourselves then we would naturally become kinder to each other isn't borne out by experience. People are quite good at being kind and compassionate to themselves: it's in being kind and compassionate to others (particularly if they are others we don't really like, or if being kind and compassionate involves us doing something we don't really want to do) that the deficit lies.
Compassion for others is developed by thinking of others more than oneself, and of putting their needs above one's own wants. These are hard things to do, and need practice. Being compassionate to oneself is merely a way to bolster the infinite variety of excuses we find for not doing hard, selfless things.
notnagging other qualities which might help us to cope with things might be patience, fortitude and perseverance. I'm not knocking resilience as such, more asking what it says about the moral values of the world we live in if it is seen as the most important quality, and saying that before we can say whether a quality is important or not, we should ask 'what is it important for?
Very interesting point niminy.
im finding myself nodding along to all of niminy's points. holding up resilience without any altruistic values to temper it will just mean that person is a 'survivor'. being such doesnt mean one cannot fall prey to egoism.
I don't equate resilience with survival. I describe my dd as resilient, she has Aspergers and other issues, her day to day life is tough.
She's not surviving she's just not being knocked back by every challenge. It keeps her sane to be honest.
i do think its an important quality - i think all of the world's religions and philosophies secular or not try and teach resilience. iv wondered about this. does resilience => tranquil? does tranquil => peaceful? does peaceful => helpful?
Resilience and compassion, being able to balance keeping life's knocks in proportion without shutting others difficulties out.
Thornrose my social miss fit of a dyslexic DD1 is very similar to your DD She's had to become very resilient because at best she gets excluded and at worse actively bullied. She also has to work way harder than her DD2 to get the same marks and yet manages to be cheerful, most of the time and kind and compassionate always.
Can resilience be taught, I'm not sure, DD1 has a deep calm self confidence beneath her dizzy dyslexic public face.
Yes the crap she gets thrown at her brings it into focus, but she was born knowing her own mind.
StarBall I like to think I've contributed to dd's resilience.
Thornrose I'm sure you have. DH and I do with lots of love, encouragement, funding hobbies she's good at and transporting her to her DFs who aren't at her school and party to the nastiness.
We've do much the same for DD2, but she hasn't DD1s optimism and resilience. Despite being very socially astute, never bullied and as undyslexic as it's possible to be, she doesn't have DD1s confidence.
She can put on a jolly good act, she takes knocks to heart and has a far more pessimistic out look on life.
If you have a clear sense of self worth and confidence you are more likely to be resilient. If you have managed expectations so that you know that you will not always win/get your own way and that it doesn't matter you are more likely to be resilient. If you don't feel that the universe is picking on you or punishing you every time something bad happens then you are more likely to be resilient.
All these factors and no doubt many others come into play. We also may be able to cope with some situations better than others. We may appear outwardly to be coping but the reality can be very different. Even if we think we are resilient in the short term things can bottle up so you lose it over something relatively small further down the line. Conversely, short term we may go to pieces, longer term we get on with things.
Does it matter if sometimes we struggle to cope? Some things in life SHOULD affect us. One of the things that help us get through the most difficult time is the support of others - back to the importance of kindness and compassion. OP - you said earlier that if you can't cope with your own life it is difficult to help others. It is often when we have been through hard times ourselves that we are best equipped to help somebody else - we can best empathise and understand when we have been through similar situations.
resilience would suggest hope - for a better future eg - and faith, that there is better around the corner/in the scheme of things. Which could also suggest purpose, that there is purpose in all things.
I can't see that resilience for resilience sake is of much use tbf: gritting your teeth against the winds in order to survive. I'd rather live than survive. Which would bring in love.
So: faith, hope, love. Not necessarily in that order lol. It says somewhere that the greatest of these is love. imo love is endlessly creative, not static like eg resilience.
Join the discussion
Please login first.