My feed
Premium

Please
or
to access all these features

This topic is for Q & As run by Mumsnet. If you'd like to sponsor a Q & A, please email [email protected].

MNHQ have commented on this thread

Sponsored Q&As

Q&A about fertility claims with Sense About Science -ANSWERS BACK

93 replies

LucilleMumsnet · 09/06/2014 10:05

This week we're running a Q&A with Sense About Science about fertility. Sense about Science has teamed up with Progress Educational Trust and the British Fertility Society to help people Ask for Evidence behind fertility claims. If you’ve seen claims for products, diets or policies about fertility then send us your questions and we will put them to the scientists.

Superfoods to promote your chances of conceiving, home-made energy bars to ward off infertility, and even fertility astrologers. Fertility is a global industry and there are hundreds of claims out there. But which ones are based on evidence that they work? Sense About Science tackles claims that aren’t backed by evidence and regularly hear from people about the emotional cost of chasing false hope.

The experts answering the Q&A will be:

Dr Allan Pacey, senior lecturer in andrology and chairman of the British Fertility Society - His research interests cover the biology of human spermatozoa and aspects of semen quality and fertility in males including occupational and environmental influences on semen quality.

Dr Gillian Lockwood, medical director of Midland Fertility - She has a special interest in age-related infertility, Polycystic Ovary Syndrome and nutrition.

Dr Sue Avery, director of assisted conception at Birmingham Women's Hospital - She has been working in the field of infertility for 30 years, as a clinical embryologist.

Post your questions to the thread before 10am on Monday 16th June and we'll post up the experts' answers the following Monday 23rd June.

Q&A about fertility claims with Sense About Science -ANSWERS BACK
Q&A about fertility claims with Sense About Science -ANSWERS BACK
Q&A about fertility claims with Sense About Science -ANSWERS BACK
OP posts:
Report
TheCheckerdyHorse · 09/06/2014 10:16

Is it possible for a young man to have his sperm frozen - privately - even though he doesn't currently have any health problems which affect his fertility?

It would be a precautionary measure against any possible future harm to fertility.

I feel a bit naive asking - maybe it's already commonplace? It seems such an obvious thing to me. And simple to do.

Report
raydown · 09/06/2014 10:29

Is there anything that can be done to improve a very low sperm count

Report
joycep · 09/06/2014 11:40

At my fertility clinic, all ivf ladies were given strict instructions to drink at least a litre of milk per day before and during ivf. They said getting a lot of protein was imperative. Is there any truth behind this? And is milk really the best way to get your protein quickly especially as there are questions marks about whether dairy is actually good for humans?

Report
joycep · 09/06/2014 11:51

Should people undergoing ivf quit refined sugar? There are claims that it has a negative impact on the way the follicles develop. Is this true?

Report
MrsF09 · 09/06/2014 12:09

Are there any advances in identifying the underlying cause of "unexplained" infertility.
Meaning is there any promising research in identifying causes of infertility that current nhs procedures/tests cannot identify.

Report
YouAreMyFavouriteWasteOfTime · 09/06/2014 12:43

i would like to see more scientific information about fertility decline and aging. information in the news appears to be low on statistics and high on scaremongering and unhelpful to people wanting to understand the real changes that will/are taking place in their body.

Report
FartyMcGhee · 09/06/2014 13:37

I had a baby at the age of 40 after IVF and made various changes to my diet including only drinking organic milk. I worry about the amount of hormones we consume in the food we eat. My question is about contraceptive pills.

Statistics from before the second world war and up to the introduction of the pill show that large numbers of women have always had children in their 40s and were doing so in greater numbers during those post war years. Clearly the introduction of the pill gave women more control over their fertility but to what extent would you agree that the hormones in contraceptives have contributed to a general loss of fertility in both men and women?


Some examples RE Birth rates...

in 1938 there were 621,204 live births recorded of those 26,599 were live births to mothers over 40
in 1947 there were 881,026 live births recorded of those 34,696 were live births to mothers over 40
in 2012 there were 729,674 live births recorded of those 29,994 were live births to mothers over 40

Report
Trooperslane · 09/06/2014 14:58

That's really interesting farty (snigger)

I'd like to know - having had a baby at 40 after countless miscarriages and 2 x ivf plus 2 icsi (with unexplained infertility and 8 years of trying)

.....if there's something in the anecdotal (afaik) chat around your body kicking itself into shape after many years of failing to carry a full term, healthy baby and subsequent 'easy' pregnancies.

I'm not sure I'm explaining that very well. Can someone else help?! Shock

Report
ShergarAndSpies · 09/06/2014 15:27

Apologies if this is too far off-tangent but do you believe there to be evidence for the oft-quoted 'fertility peak' immediately post-miscarriage?

Would you recommend immediately trying to conceive (assuming emotionally ready) or do you think it is preferable to take time to re-prepare the body for another pregnancy?

Thank you

Report
raydown · 09/06/2014 17:48

I've thought of more! is there any evidence that ICSI can cause long term development or health problems? And what about the effects of ivf on a women? Can the drugs increase the risk of cancer?

Report
NatashaBee · 09/06/2014 17:53

This reply has been deleted

Message withdrawn at poster's request.

joycep · 09/06/2014 18:08

When I had ivf, I was given steroids and ivig treatment because my immune results showed I had an over active immune system. The clinic had excellent results with this treatment, with many women finally having a successful pregnancy after multiple failed treatments elsewhere. Many top private clinics use this treatment and does many places in the USA as well.
Yet it is not accepted by NHS doctors and most are not even willing to have a conversation about it.
Is this because there just isn't enough evidence for this treatment at this time? And is it possible that one day the evidence will show that women's immune system can play a role in recurrent miscarriage and unexplained infertility?

Report
LadyIsabellaWrotham · 09/06/2014 18:19

There's been a bit of a backlash recently regarding the Daily Mail's favourite scary statistics about declining fertility in 35+ women.

Whilst much of the revisionist data seems well-founded, I do worry that all the "Stop Panicking!" articles concentrate on reassuringly high chances of getting pregnant at older ages, but never seem to factor in the significantly higher risks of miscarriage to give you the odds of an actual baby.

What do you think? Am I being too pessimistic?

Report
Littlemisshopefull · 09/06/2014 21:53

What is the probability of someone with non-obstructive azoospermia successfully fathering children? Is it possible?

Would icsi be the best option? What data exists regarding the physical and mental health for children born via icsi - i read somewhere that there is a higher rate of learning difficulties in these babies - is this true?

Report
RidgyTipper · 10/06/2014 16:27

Whys is MTHFR testing not carried out for women suffering recurrent miscarriages. I've known SO many women who were told their miscarriages were due to 'unknown' cause, who then started investigating genetic testing and found they were either hetero- or homozygous for MFTHR and just needed to take the right form of frolic acid. Very frustrating that so few medical professionals seem clued up in this area.

Report
Bue · 10/06/2014 17:16

^Is there anything that can be done to improve a very low sperm count

Report
PlentyOfPubeGardens · 10/06/2014 21:30

I don't have a question about fertility but I just wanted to say thank you for the Sense About Science website. I think it's bloody marvellous on all sorts of topics Smile

Report
beakybeak · 10/06/2014 22:45

I was wondering if there is a natural way of encouraging ovulation rather then using medication such as clomid etc?

Report
ballsballsballs · 10/06/2014 23:31

I'm a fan of the website :) Thank you for fighting the good fight.

When we were going through fertility tests, I was astonished about the number of people around me who told me that a positive attitude was everything. Also, that if we 'just relaxed' and 'stopped thinking about it' a pregnancy would miraculously happen. Or we should go on a holiday... There is no evidence that any of these things could improve sperm quantity and motility. We looked at the figures and decided not to go ahead with IVF.

A lot of people on the fertility forum I used to frequent were convinced that acupuncture would help the success of IVF. Is this true?

Report
barkingtreefrog · 11/06/2014 09:38

After 2.5 years of ttc and no identified problems other than uneven cycles (I have a 7 or 8 day luteal phase which no medical professional so far has believed is a problem) I have turned to alternative options and have been trying a wheat free diet and acupuncture. I'd be interested to know whether there was any evidence that either of these things might help regulate my hormones and even out my cycle, giving me a greater chance of conception. Or, indeed, whether there's any evidence that a very short luteal phase causes problems with conception.

Report
tigerdog · 11/06/2014 09:57

Do you think there is any substance to the idea that there can be mental rather than physical blocks to conception in cases of unexplained fertlity?

Report
worldgonecrazy · 11/06/2014 11:46

Rather than allowing them to perish, do you think it would help improve success rates if couples were encouraged to donate "spare" embryos towards research? Perhaps some posters or similar in the waiting rooms?

Report

Don’t want to miss threads like this?

Weekly

Sign up to our weekly round up and get all the best threads sent straight to your inbox!

Log in to update your newsletter preferences.

You've subscribed!

LadyIsabellaWrotham · 11/06/2014 16:35

Returning to the subject of age-related infertility. We used to hear that there was a problem with ignorance about women's fertility declining with age and that loads of people assumed that it would be fine to plan four children staring at age 35.

Presumably this is no longer the case and anyone who hasn't been living under a rock for the last decade knows there's an issue. But I wondered whether there was still another great misapprehension; that IVF will magically make the problem go away.

In your opinion, is there still a problem with people thinking that IVF is a cure for age-related sub-fertility?

Report
puddymuddles · 11/06/2014 19:10

Is it possible for a woman to be trying to conceive a child for 13 years then suddenly gets pregnant with the same man, no previous miscarriages and no gynecological operations/medical procedures/fertility treatment?

Report
SueDNim · 11/06/2014 19:42

Does evidence support the idea of timing sex differently if you want a boy or girl?

Report
Please create an account

To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.