We're delighted to announce that the Prime Minister, Gordon Brown, will be logging on to Mumsnet for a live webchat on Friday (tomorrow) lunchtime from 1 to 2. The PM is ready to answer Mumsnetters' questions on a wide-range of policy issues from the economy to education and from childcare to climate change.
As you know we're not great ones for rule books here at MNHQ, but we'd like this to be as useful and enlightening an event as it can be, for all involved. We aren't going to pre-moderate or pre-select questions - the format will be as per usual - but given the likely popularity of this webchat, the sheer number of you all and our past experience of trying to fit everything in, we've come up with a few ground rules which we'd be very grateful if you'd follow.
Guidelines for MN webchat with PM
1. To allow as many folks as possible to be involved, please restrict your questions to one per member plus a follow up question if appropriate, i.e. once you've had a response. (NB don't even think about name changing to ask another, we'll be watching!).
2. Please keep your question reasonably brief (we'll not doing a word count but it will increase your chance of getting an answer, we suspect, if you don't bang on for paragraphs)
3. It's highly unlikely he'll be able to answer everyone's question but we'll make every effort to bring common themes to his attention. Please don't be too disappointed if your specific question doesn't get answered and do try not to keep posting "What about me?". He can't answer them all and he is the PM after all - so has a quite few time constraints.
4. Obviously you're free to voice your opinion but do be civil/polite - the PM is our guest on Mumsnet so, whatever your politics, please afford him the same cordiality you would if he stopped by your own house.
Many thanks - feel free to put your question up in advance if you can't make the live chat on Friday lunchtime.
squeaver
Thu 15-Oct-09 13:24:33
No way!!
Ed Balls obviously put in a good word!
snice
Thu 15-Oct-09 13:24:41
<<tries to think of something clever>>
lankyalto
Thu 15-Oct-09 13:24:55
Brilliant MNHQ! What a coup.
I have no idea what I'd like to ask, but congrats MN!
VinegARGHHHtits
Thu 15-Oct-09 13:25:40
oh well done
<goes off to think of a sensible Q to ask the PM>
Do you think he will 'get' my name
<wonders if Gordon was ever a fan of PCBH>
scarletlilybug
Thu 15-Oct-09 13:26:08
I'll look forward to it.
Let's hope GB is a quick typist, so he can answer lots of questions.
monkeysavingexpertdotcom
Thu 15-Oct-09 13:26:28
That's brilliant! I love Gordon Brown. Won't be here for webchat though
. Noone be horrid to him now.
ShutUpandDrinkYourGin
Thu 15-Oct-09 13:29:31
I look forward to the prime minister writing 'Dear VinegarTits...'
Yay! Well done MNHQ. Will have to see if I can be quite as obsequious and toadying as I was to Ed Balls.
StewieGriffinsMom
Thu 15-Oct-09 13:30:41
Message withdrawn at poster's request.
I look forward to his reply 
Dear TerryWogansCock.....
squeaver
Thu 15-Oct-09 13:31:49
If we're all nice and play by the rules maybe we could ask something in return: that he (or whoever's doing the typing) answers the questions directly and avoids going straight into policy-spout mode.
AitchTwoToTangOh
Thu 15-Oct-09 13:32:54
Well done. I like him, I think he's decent. Flawed, but who isn't? And his wife seems lovely. So there you have it, nothing policy-related, just a vote of confidence. 
StewieGriffinsMom
Thu 15-Oct-09 13:32:59
Message withdrawn at poster's request.
AitchTwoToTangOh
Thu 15-Oct-09 13:33:59
apparently he has, sgsmum, he said so recently.
StewieGriffinsMom
Thu 15-Oct-09 13:35:24
Message withdrawn at poster's request.
Oh no! I will be in a meeting/on a train then. 
Brilliant news, and glad he's coming on to talk to us. But does he know what he's let himself in for?!
squeaver
Thu 15-Oct-09 13:39:59
yes I like Sarah too. Maybe she could come for a web chat too?
My question for Gordon Brown:
What kind of secondary school would you like your son John to attend?
I like him, I met him at Old Moat Sure Start cetre earlier this year 
I would like to ask if GB agrees that public perception of individual politicians is as important as policy when it comes to how people vote in an election. If yes, how can that be changed? How can you persuade the public to look beyond the possibly misleading media portrayal of a public figure?