Mumsnet has not checked the qualifications of anyone posting here. Free legal advice is available from a Citizen's Advice Bureau, and the Law Society can supply a list of local solicitors.

summonsed for council tax

(32 Posts)
enichol Wed 13-Mar-13 22:34:27

Hi all

I hope you can help! Been trying to deal with this for a while but not got very far.

My other half and I have recently been summonsed to Leicester magistrates Court for non-payment. We have been emailing the council and they have been replying, but rather robotically. We were receiving full council tax benefit under self employment as my other half is self employed but is disabled due to his Army service and his work suffers. So much so that he rarely breaks even and mostly loses investment money. He continues because its better than giving in to his disabilty and doing nothing, and better than signing onto soul destroying job centre plus for unemployment - in any case his disability makes him unable to keep some appointments, he has been described as having a low immune system and ME. I was was made redundant and since having 2 children found it hard to get another job and so stay at home with the kids and so Im not registered as anything!

He was asked to fill in self employment form by the council which he did and gave in to their offices. In return he was sent a Bill informing him that we had been awarded full CT benefit (it was the same the previous year and our circumstances had not changed for the better, in fact cashflow got worse). However, we recently recieved a Summons for non payment. On emailing the Council we have been told that a few weeks after our full CTB Bill they had sent another Bill which informed us that we had to pay around 65 – 70 percent of the Bill. I have not seen this Bill nor any other follow up demands they now say they sent. the last we knew of was the Bill detailing full CTB.

I had been hoping that they would see sense and reinstate the Bill we did get, but they simply say that we need to pay the ‘outstanding’ amount. they cannot even tell me why we seem to have been awarded a partial discount as only 65-70 percent is being demanded.

We go to court in a next week and my husbands health isnt great so I am concerned about him being able to go to defend us (as I say his erratic illness makes it hard to keep any appointments and sometimes he can fall asleep for many hours at a time and cannot be roused - several times in excess of 24 hours). I am suffering with my pregnancy and have already been to Hospital twice with hyperemesis and i am spending most of my time at the moment gagging and trying to sip water. We do not have any disposable to pay anything to them, as we have already been awarded full ctb, in theory we should not owe anything anyway. Also, despite us telling the Council several times in the past that my surname is now my husbands name, they have used my maiden name on the summons. (someone has mentioned to me that the summons is not issued by the court, instead is printed off by the Council and is therefore invaild - is that right?) They have also used my maiden name on the most recent Bill and on the new Bill for next year. (which is a full bill and on the back says that reduction support should now be applied for but in the meantime we have to pay as billed, which could push us into very severe financial troubles.)

Ive read a bit on this site about Council tax and there seems to be some knowledgeable ladies here - so I have my fingers crossed!

Thanks for reading

BrendaBlethyn Wed 13-Mar-13 22:36:14

how on EARTH are you pregnant if he is so ill?

IME the council will do their best to do deals outside court

why have you not managed to speak to a person yet? dont email?

CogitoErgoSometimes Thu 14-Mar-13 06:57:26

I agree with the PP that this is far too urgent and important to leave to e-mails. It's possibly why it's ended up in court. You need to urgently see your Council department responsible for council tax and council tax benefits in person, taking all copies of letters and e-mails to/from you and them. Go through with the Council exactly what has gone wrong and don't leave until you have a resolution to the problem. You might also want to talk to CAB but I think direct to the Council is more immediate.

Certainly don't take a chance that the summons in invalid.

HarlotOTara Thu 14-Mar-13 07:03:21

What has the pregnancy and being able to have sex got to do with this? Agree with other poster go and speak to someone in person as soon as you can. Does your husband have a formal diagnosis - if so take evidence with you and other paperwork to with your circumstances.

LIZS Thu 14-Mar-13 07:21:00

There must have been some misunderstanding and you need to be clear as to what circumstances are relevant (ie. low income)and what aren't (changing name, pregnancy, being SE). Only specific circumstances would enable a rebate such as claiming ESA. If the CT claim was reviewed and you were liable for 70% then there is little you can do but offer to make a repayment , however small, over time. Do you/could you work ? The only way to resolve this is to visit the council offices and talk to someone urgently to gp thrugh the paper trail. Once it has gone to court and bailiffs are involved there is less leeway for negotiation. CAB may be able to help you clarify what has happened beforehand.

WhoWhatWhereWhen Thu 14-Mar-13 07:28:50

Go to your local Citizens Advice Bureau,

www.citizensadvice.org.uk/index/getadvice?txt_search=le1

ask them for a benefits check to see if yu should be getting Council Tax Benefit and show them the summons.

CelticPromise Thu 14-Mar-13 07:34:08

You definitely need to see someone in person. It may well be that he is being disregarded for CT but you are still liable- I believe single person discount takes it down a bit? If you're a SAHM you wouldn't necessarily get any discount for you. I would try CAB/ law centre/ or De Montfort uni used to offer free advice from graduate law students, worth a try.

Don't ignore the summons. If you do owe, offer £x per week, whatever you can afford.

CelticPromise Thu 14-Mar-13 07:37:46

Also if one/both of you are not fit to attend ( although if it's you on the summons, it's only you that has to) get a sick note from GP saying not fit to attend court and send to court to try to adjourn. This would only delay though.

stormforce10 Thu 14-Mar-13 08:58:53

Have you tried contacting your local councillor? A good councillor should be able to get your case reviewed by a senior benefits officer to try to establish the true situation and get some kind of clarity. It sounds like a mistake has been made and the council need to go over the case properly.

You should be able to find and contact your councillor here

enichol Thu 14-Mar-13 12:48:47

Hi thanks all for replying

At the moment it seems that the best way forward is to claim it back when they have sorted it out properly, but we will have to borrow the money to do that. I dont see why any citizen should be forced to pay what they dont have. Some friends of my husband have worked as Process Servers and apparently they suggested that in their experience to pay any 'debt' first then try to claim it back is the wrong thing to do. Also the Council can take ages and all the while we are denied use of our money while they have use of it. Of course I have an issue with the charges though as whilst I dont feel we are actually liable for the 'debt' I certainly dont think we are liable for charges applied to what In my opinion is their mistake.

The Council is very well aware of our health issues but they appear to ignore this. (I do laugh with the lady who asks how we can have sex if my husband is ill! ) His illness is very official as he lost his Military career being forced out under medical discharge because of it and is constantly in and out of NHS clinics as the military have left the civvies to clear up the 'mess'. I appreciate that on this Forum I have been urged to call the Council to sort this matter out. I will make some calls today, but I should add that I have called the Council about other matters (and other companies such as utility companies and banks where there have been admin errors) and found that when the problems are still there, they always claim to 'have no record' of our phone conversation. So as its been my experience that they may need somesort of record shoved back at them which is why I email. Also rather than post a letter which can take days and has to incur the extra cost of recorded delivery to have some sort of record that it was sent, emailing is quicker. Why do the Council never send demands and summons recorded? Apparently at the hearing they have to prove they sent all the paperwork that they are obligated to do under the Council Tax rules - well we havent seen anything until the summons so how do they prove it?

A couple of times Ive pointed out this point the we now appear to be liable for 70% and that we cannot find any circumstance where anyone would get a 30% discount. However in the 2 emails that I have since received, they have not answered that point.

Its been suggested to me by a friend to use one of the services charities. I will encourage my husband to do this today. He has had to use a welfare officer from the Veterans Agency before, although he had to be forced to do that as he is still a proud man and frustrated by his situation. They were very helpful before and I hadnt considered it myself. I shall also look into the local Councillor. Ive tried the CAB a few times this morning but not been able to get past the engaged tone. They close at 1, so if no luck today will have to try again next week. I am struggling with the HG sickness though so its hard enough to type and look at this screen, its very hard to talk while constantly gagging. I hope there are ladies here that can sympathise with HG.

If there is any more advice, please add!

thanks

Potterer Fri 15-Mar-13 06:44:14

Firstly don't panic I used to work in council tax.

The court is a magistrates court not a county court so no ccj. It is merely to give the council power to collect any debt by other methods. They go to get a Liability Order.

You don't need to attend court, I think people have the idea that there is just a handful of people, but in reality we used to do 1500 people in one go. That's not per year, that's per court run.

We present the list, magistrate says yes, we go in a room get given use of a court rubber stamp & stamp all our own stuff.

Once they have the Liability Order it means they can ask for an income & expenditure to be filled out, personally I never used to think this was very accurate because it didn't ask enough questions.

They use that information to have employer details, meaning that should you fail to either make an arrangement to pay or not keep up the payments thru can take money directly from someone's salary.

Bailiffs are a very last resort & very far down the line. I am now a sahm but the going rate of repayment for someone on benefits was £2.60 a week.

The bill, reminders & final notices are covered by legislation so there isn't any way for a member of staff to over ride it.

Request a copy of the bill so you can see what time period it covers. I'll put this on my watch list to help in any way I can.

so you don't get a chance in court to contest your liability?

escape Fri 15-Mar-13 06:53:24

Potterer - so sorry to Hjack OP's thread. Your input is very timely. My Grandma is very recently widowed, I am sorting her admin/finances. Appar, She & Grandad agreed to pay a cousins debt to 'Rossendales' - Bailiffs/Debt Mgt. - Nanna says this was Council Tax arrears etc - Is this the way that CT is recovered?

NinaNannar Fri 15-Mar-13 07:07:03

No one contests liability. Ever. Ime

i'm in a position where i need to - it's on an old property that i owned and had to move out of for health reasons about 4.5 years ago now! it was repossessed some time after. i provided evidence at the time that i was exempt under having to vacate the property due to disability.

they forget me for a while then send another random made up bill - each time for a different amount, for different time periods, with different exemptions and reductions applied etc etc. i used to write long letters in response and provide more evidence but it's gotten to the stage where i just scribble on the letter they've sent me with corrections, stick it back in the envelope and 'return to sender'.

can you contest? if so how or once it goes to court is it really just a rubber stamp job?

(sorry for hijack OP)

LIZS Fri 15-Mar-13 07:21:10

but it's gotten to the stage where i just scribble on the letter they've sent me with corrections, stick it back in the envelope and 'return to sender'

Sorry but that isn't a defence . You need to make an appointment to go and discuss it, ask for copies of all bills and correspondence . If it goes back 4 1/2 years your dh's current illness and your pg aren't relevant to the outstanding amount. If only you lived at the address , it is your bill.

LIZS Fri 15-Mar-13 07:22:07

Sorry got confused between the 2 posters. blush

CelticPromise Fri 15-Mar-13 07:23:45

If you are summonsed you do have to attend unless there is anything on the summons about doing it by post or similar.

this is 4 years on with gaps of 3 to 6 months between bothering to contact me lizs. i scribble because there's nothing new to say - so 'these figures are wrong, i moved out on date x, property was repossessed on date y, i was exempt by clause z, please see all of my previous correspondence' is about all that's worth saying.

not sure why it should be me chasing and making appointments over their errors. i don't have time.

oh i see you've muddled the OP's post and my post together thinking we're the same person. i'm not being taken to court at this stage though that's been threatened a couple of times then i write, they go quiet again for a few months then we go back to square one.

LIZS Fri 15-Mar-13 07:27:01

but chances are your returned post isn't being dealt with by the same department . You need to sort this out once and for all, even if you think they haven't updated their records. CT is a priority payment so defaults get treated very seriously.

PearlyWhites Fri 15-Mar-13 07:27:17

Brenda you are very rude biscuit

4.5 years lizs so not that seriously in this case. it is complete incompetency.

in the meantime i've been paying my council tax at my new home without any problems. just not willing to pay it on a place i didn't and couldn't live.

CelticPromise Fri 15-Mar-13 07:38:46

swallowed if I were you I'd send a recorded delivery letter explaining the whole sorry saga to a named person, and state you do not accept liability. Keep a copy. Then if they do try to take it further you can demonstrate you've done what you can.

There are hearings for council tax as well as the rubber stamping potterer talks about. Presumably there is correspondence beforehand where you can accept or contest liability.

Potterer Sun 17-Mar-13 18:51:07

Crikey this thread moved fast,

escape yes, if they make a payment arrangement with a bailiff then the debt is dealt with by them. So Rossendales does sound familiar to me. Although why they agreed to pay someone else's bill is very kind but also worries me, due to the reputation of these collection agencies.

CelticPromise in the court we used (teeny) the judges do not have time or inclination to hear someone's sob story of why they haven't paid. They are only interested in where we have made a mistake. To be truthful, if someone had contacted us then there would be no way we would proceed to court based on an incorrect bill.

As we ran court runs every couple of months, it wouldn't take long to fix an account to be correct and still manage to collect the monies in.

The whole council tax system is covered by legislation. They send a bill, if you default you get a reminder, it clearly states that should you fail to pay they will ask for the whole bill in one go. If you bring your arrears up to date then all is well. If you default again you get a second reminder and that will be the last reminder you will get.

So if after that first reminder you failed to pay or you default again after the second reminder you get a final notice. It says pay the bill in full or we will take you to court. At this stage there is no way I or any of my colleagues would make a payment arrangement. We want that Liability Order to give us the power to collect that money.

Re proving the bills have been sent, one thing going missing is one thing but 3 or 4 is unheard of unless you have problems with your other post. It is all computerised, the system shows the bills have been issued, and on our system would even tell you if it went straight out or came into the office to be scrutinised before being sent out. There isn't proof of postage nor is it sent recorded delivery.

Also if the emails don't answer your questions email them straight back and demand to know. I think you are dealing with a really shoddy council by the sounds of it. If you do ever deal with anyone on the phone, take a full name from them and a direct line if they will give it. Also ask for their manager's name too.

enichol Mon 18-Mar-13 23:07:47

Many thanks to all, for the advice to my predicament.

Potterer -As you worked for a Council on this matter. Can I just ask again for clarity. We received a Bill stating that we are in reciept of Full CTB and the liability is nil. The next letter to us that I was aware of was the Summons. It was via email dialogue that I have found out that apparently a further updated Bill was issued - of course, not received. I have no idea why I have not seen anything until the summons. The Council tax department simply state that they cannot do anything now and will proceed to Court. They have, however, suggested that I get in touch with the Benefit department (in all honesty I thought that my correspondence would be addressed by whoever needed to - I thought the Council Tax department would be the people to 'speak' to.) I have emailed and tried to get to someone in the Benefits section of the Council today. No luck and will try again tomorrow.

Unless I get some satisfaction from them in the next few days, my planned course of action is to attend the hearing and show the zero liability Bill and state that I knew nothing further until the summons.

Do you think this course of action will be acceptable?

many thanks

Join the discussion

Join the discussion

Registering is free, easy, and means you can join in the discussion, get discounts, win prizes and lots more.

Register now