Mumsnet has not checked the qualifications of anyone posting here. If you have any legal concerns we suggest you consult a solicitor.

How much % of his salary am I entitled to?

(47 Posts)
pinkypig Tue 19-Mar-13 13:29:52

Also posted in divorce.

Just beginng the process of divorce on the grounds of his adultery (hidden for 16 months).

We have 4 children aged 6, 4, 2 and 10 months.

We have no investments, no property, nothing (he was shit with money and spent quite a bit on OW).

He is offering me 62% of his income plus 50% of any bonuses he receives. What about his pension, am I entitled to that. I am 40 this year and gave up my career to have our family.

Do any of you have any experience of this. 62% of the pot when I will have 5 people to pay for seems low. I was thinking more like 69%. Any thoughts?

We are about to start mediation but I wanted to just ask if anyone here had any experience or advice.

Married for 8.5 years. I worked until we had our first child.

Thanks

RedHelenB Fri 22-Mar-13 07:05:58

Will ex still be in his high earning job for 20 years realistically? By taking almost 70% of his earnings he would be left with a below average wage for London & you have to think, does he enjoy his job so much that that won't matter? If he gets into debt by carrying on a lifestyle he can no longer afford ( you say he's not good with money) then he would have to reduce the money he pays as spousal maintenance (should be via the court but might just reduce the amount unilaterally)

Best thing is for the pair of you to look at living accommodation for you both, bills etc & see what a realistic split is. After divorce you are paying for two households so cloth has to be cut accordingly so hopefully you will be able to agree something sustainable at mediation.

evansthebread Thu 21-Mar-13 23:51:13

With regards to the comments here (and other postings) made by qualified solicitors about OPs and others taking layman's or "experienced" people's advice - I'm so with you.

My divorce circumstances were very unusual, and although most of my friends had already divorced and amassed various experiences between them, none of them had the knowledge of the points of law that my particular divorce required.

Collaborate Thu 21-Mar-13 23:22:43

Either parent can replace court ordered child maintenance with CSA maintenance after a year. Beware therefore inflated offers of child maintenance. Anything above the CSA max (based on his income) should be spouse maintenance.

STIDW Thu 21-Mar-13 22:53:40

Currently the CSA will only assess child maintenance on the first £2k net income per week. However the court can order top up payments for higher earners earning more.

pinkypig Thu 21-Mar-13 21:39:21

Thanks folks. Baby what do you mean '£500 is not a cap'?

I have just been googling 'consent order' which by what I can see makes the financial arrangement (for CM and SM) legally binding. Ex is claiming he will pay the agreed amount until youngest finishes full time ed. So that could be 20 years! I will be 60 by then.

Any experience (still waiting for apt to see solicitor).

Thx

babybarrister Thu 21-Mar-13 21:18:14

There are two elements - spousal and child maintenance - if DH earns a lot then it is not the CSA that would deal with child maintenance. £500 is not a cap

WhoWhatWhereWhen Thu 21-Mar-13 20:39:53

CSA would take £500 per week, currently that's the maximum

Lonecatwithkitten Thu 21-Mar-13 20:33:17

Oops sorry. All is well thank you.

mumblechum1 Thu 21-Mar-13 20:32:30

Lonecat Thank you! Hope all's well with you and yours smile

babybarrister Thu 21-Mar-13 18:52:28

Some of them are actually mengringrin

Lonecatwithkitten Thu 21-Mar-13 17:23:16

Merci I think you have been a little unfair to the lawyers who have posted here. Many of these lovely ladies often take time to look up and then post about certain cases that offer a particular point of law. They do this out of the goodness of their hearts and many people would be in a worse position were it not for them.
Mumblechum I can personally voucher for as she wrote my will.

MOSagain Thu 21-Mar-13 17:03:25

Agree with collaborate, mumblechum and babybarriser all of whom are qualified and extremely experienced lawyers specialising in family law. Mumblechum is also experienced in writing wills and has her own will writing business. Please see ad in small businesses.

Due to insinuations made by a poster several months ago a number of us lawyers (yes, I'm one too) undertook a 'verifying' exercise and are able to vouch for each other. I have seen evidence that the above-mentioned posters are indeed qualified lawyers and at least two of them can vouch for my qualifications. Of course, you could just believe that we are all lying but to be honest, I think we have far better things to do than pretend to be something we are not.

Mendi Wed 20-Mar-13 21:41:11

nannyof3 you are quite wrong about the bonuses. Cash bonuses are deemed income (and deferred bonuses are unvested shares are income in the year they vest) and therefore liable to be included in a child maintenance assessment as well as any spousal maintenance that may be awarded. On £8k net a month the OP's STBXH is on a gross salary of over £150k and with pre-school children and a 10 year marriage it is inconceivable that the OP would not be awarded spousal maintenance (at least until youngest child in school)in addition to child maintenance.

<lawyer> <also divorced>

Collaborate Wed 20-Mar-13 08:53:21

I agree. Anyone would be mad to actually rely on advice from someone anonymous.

I think though we all have a duty to be sure about what we post.

mercibucket Wed 20-Mar-13 08:39:48

if of course they are lawyers grin

personally i would put no more weight on 'im a lawyer and...' than i would on ' im not a lawyer but ....' on an online forum, and imo that is the sensible thing to do.

babybarrister Wed 20-Mar-13 03:41:22

I do respect opinions on non lawyers re their own divorces but always worth remembering that the lawyers on here will have had experience of hundreds or thousands of divorces ....grin

STIDW Wed 20-Mar-13 01:23:59

I'm not a lawyer but I don't like the word "entitlement." Rather divorce settlements are about sharing assets "fairly" therefore complying with the law.

RedHelenB wrote;

"even if a court ruled such a thing"

I'm not saying it is the case here but I know of cases where spouse maintenance has been awarded at 30-40% of the payer's income and they have paid child maintenance and school fees on top so it certainly is possible for courts to rule such a thing.

wannaBe wrote;

As long as he's supporting his child I don't see why he should be expected to support me for the rest of all eternity. I've got my equity from the house etc so I haven't sold myself shourt in terms of division of assets, it just seems wrong to me to expect money for as long as I can get my hands on it.

It's important to remember everybody's circumstances are different. In the OP's case there isn't any equity to share and it is no more dependent using SM to house the four children and herself than you using your equity. It isn't likely she will be able to earn as much as her husband and it doesn't seem very fair to me that the children should be expected to live with one parent very modestly most of the time and in relative luxury when staying with the other parent. Fortunately in England & Wales there is an element of sharing when determining SM.

BTW SM must stop on remarriage but I think you will find it doesn't necessarily terminate on cohabitation.

OP, I don't know how you arrived at your figure but please see a solicitor for independent advice to find out where you stand and what options there are in your particular circumstances. Hopefully you can then negotiate an agreement from an informed position.

wannaBe Tue 19-Mar-13 22:42:38

I only have experience of this from a personal pov i.e. I am currently going through a divorce.

Firstly, the reasons for the divorce are irrelevant - the only reason why people file for adultery, unreasonable behavior etc is because it enables the process to move more quickly. Otherwise you would have to wait for two years. But from a financial perspective it makes no difference why the marriage broke down.

Secondly, there is a difference between child maintanence and spousal maintanence. Your dh is legally obliged to pay child maintanence, and I don't have the exact figures to hand but check the CSA website because there is a starting point but this also then alters according to the number of nights per week your children spend with their father.

There is also spousal maintanence and this can vary esp if, say, you have given up your career in order to raise a family, but the norm is certainly not as high as 69% afaik. Also any spousal maintanence would only apply until you remarried or cohabited with another partner at which point that would cease and your ex would only be liable for child maintanence. He could also apply too the court to reduce this sum if his circumstances changed.

Wrt his pension you could claim entitlement to half of that but bear in mind that that half would be as it stands now not at his retirement age, it would be frozen and half paid to you on retirement.

Now this is all very well but

While you are raising children it is understandable that you will require some level of financial support. However, once your youngest is school age you will be in a position to find workk and begin to financially support yourself. Ask yourself - why would you want to remain financially dependent on someone with whom you no longer seek to have a relationship? Wrt his pension - you have another twenty/thirty years in which to acumulate your pension, doo you really think it fair that you should still be entitled to half his pension thirty years down the line?

My personal view is that while the initial period after a divorce is difficult and you will require financial support to rebuild your life, esp as a current sahm to four young children financial independence should be the ultimate aim. You want this man out of your life for a reason - as long as he supports his children, you should only seek to be "entitled" to spousal maintanence for as long as it takes you to gain your own independence financially. After all, his circumstances may change. He may lose his job or remarry and have other children to support, or fall ill or any number of other unforeseen things. And what then? An "entitlement" can only last for as long as there is something to be entitled to, iyswim.

In my own position my ex has been very reasonable (I won't go into details here as frankly it's not really anyone's concern), but I haven't made a claim on any of his bonuses or his pension as I feel that is just a bit grabbing iyswim. My aim is to build my own business and to gain my own financial independence by the end of the year. People tell me I should be "going after" hmm a lot more, but why should I? As long as he's supporting his child I don't see why he should be expected to support me for the rest of all eternity. I've got my equity from the house etc so I haven't sold myself shourt in terms of division of assets, it just seems wrong to me to expect money for as long as I can get my hands on it. Now I will just state at this point that I haven't made a specific date for the end of the year for xh not to support me, but I wish this to be the case for both our sakes. He shouldn't have to struggle financially any more than I should.

ladymuckbeth Tue 19-Mar-13 22:02:34

RedHelen - I have to say that you are one of those posters who manages to make your posts have the appearance of professional experience, without actually saying that you are a layman. You posted on a thread I did a few weeks back under a different name, and managed to make me feel quite dreadful about my circumstances.

Nobody minds ordinary Joes giving their experiences; it's when they do so whilst using slightly grandiose language which is suggestive of some sort of higher knowledge which must be more than grating to the lawyers who contribute on these boards.

mercibucket Tue 19-Mar-13 21:42:20

yes, collaborate, had your goal in doing those qualifications been simply to post on mumsnet, i think those years were perhaps wasted

Collaborate Tue 19-Mar-13 21:14:37

Don't know why I bothered doing 3 years law degree, 1 year law society finals, 2 years training contract then 20 years in practice with continuing education, when all along all I needed to do was either go through a divorce myself or have a close friend who did, then I would have known enough to be able to dispense advice with confidence and authority.

babybarrister Tue 19-Mar-13 21:02:06

Oh and agree with collaborate who yes is a v experienced family lawyer as am I!!!

babybarrister Tue 19-Mar-13 20:59:28

That is again incorrect advice on here re bonus - you may be able to take a share re spousal maintenance . Please find a lawyer ... Have a look on resolution websitesmile

RedHelenB Tue 19-Mar-13 19:13:45

there not their!!

RedHelenB Tue 19-Mar-13 19:11:01

Oh & I totally agree with Northern.

Join the discussion

Join the discussion

Registering is free, easy, and means you can join in the discussion, get discounts, win prizes and lots more.

Register now