We and neighbours have a brick shed that lies across the boundary. We each own an 'L' shaped portion of it. The felt roof needs totally replaced (timber is rotten, roof waterlogged).
We have a quote from someone, they have a quote from someone else. They are insisting they will "use their mate whatever". (They do say he has his own company, is insured etc but we've yet to (a) meet him and (b) check this out). It'a a bit of an "issue" atm because I feel they've basically tried to force us to use their mate (even though he's basically the same price as the guy who we have a quote from who has done work for us before)
Everyone that has quoted us has said that the roof needs to be replaced as a whole, it can't be done in the 2 sections.
So, where does everybody stand if their mate starts the work on their half only and our roof collapses? Is he responsible cos he should have known it couldn't be done in 2 sections/roof is unstable? Would we have any liability towards him because it's our bit of roof (e.g. if he decides to stand on our bit of unstable roof to work on their bit of unstable roof and goes through it)?
Please or to access all these features
Please
or
to access all these features
Mumsnet has not checked the qualifications of anyone posting here. If you have any legal concerns we suggest you consult a solicitor.
Legal matters
Where would we/neighbours/builder stand in this situation?
10 replies
craftynclothy · 02/03/2011 09:27
OP posts:
Please create an account
To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.