We have just had a failed IVF and FET with the Bridge Centre - we are unexplained although they did diagnose an out of phase lining which they treated during the FET but cycle still failed..
I really rate the Bridge Centre but I can't help feeling they are a little pedantic and not so good at thinking to far out side of the box.
I had heard good things about ARGC but having done a little research I can see that the clinic has been linked to a Panorama investigation, a GMC investigation and quite a lot of controversy surrounding high success rates.
The ARGC also seem v interested in NK cells and I had a diagnosis from a clinic we had initial investigations with that mine were high. However, the Bridge do not believe that NK cells in the blood stream can impact implantation.
So, do I stick with the Bridge and put my failure down to statistics or do I move on to the ARGC who look like they are an "all guns blazing" kind of clinic with high success rates albeit it somewhat controversial??
Has any one had dealings / success with ARGC?
I thought I'd made a decision to start afresh at new clinic in January but now I am panicking!