Apologies to anyone who lives in a new build and is perfectly happy there. Obviously people need housing (and jobs in the construction industry). But why are the houses not built on brown field sites? If they were, they would actually improve the local area, and not ruin the quality of life of the local people.
And why are they often so unattractive? Huge concrete blocks with tiny windows and rooms so tiny that you can barely take two strides in any direction.
According to this article, local councils are in the pockets of the developers, who appear to be completely lacking in any sense of responsibility to the local community. But I don't understand why the members of the council aren't as concerned as we are to protect our environment? Isn't it their job to stand up for us rather than let the developers walk all over us? Why do they allow the land banking that is going on, according to the article?
This article is about a planned development in Craighouse, Edinburgh, but this sort of thing is happening everywhere. I've cut and pasted some bits from the article to give you a flavour.
'CRAIGHOUSE is a stunning hilltop site on one of Edinburgh?s famous seven hills. A highly protected landscape with Grade-A listed buildings dramatically set against woodland, rolling parkland sweeps down to some of the most wonderful views in the city taking in the castle, Arthur?s Seat, North Berwick Law and the Lomond Hills. For generations, the local community and wider public have used this beauty spot for walking, bike-riding, watching fireworks, and climbing trees.
In March, the Craighouse Partnership?s application to put c.178,000 square feet of new-build development, plus roads and car-parks on this treasured area triggered one of the largest numbers of objection letters ever received by the city?s planning department for a single planning application. ...
Edinburgh is potentially facing a green-space crisis. ... A major reason given for this is that the Scottish Government has demanded that more land be released for development. This, despite the fact that developers are already sitting on plentiful land-banked sites with planning permission to provide enough new housing stock for many years.
Land-banking is where developers gain planning permission for a site, thereby dramatically increasing its land value - and let it sit as an asset on their books or sell it on. They may sit on the site for many years or, indeed, have no plans to develop it themselves, merely taking money out of the site. Some developers boast of banks of thousands of consented sites on their balance sheets. Land-banking is a massive problem in Scotland - which neither the Council nor the Scottish Government are tackling. Once a site has increased its value, there is no need for a developer to build on it to see that value realised.
The estimates used for housing over the next 5 years are widely accepted to be far too high, and were based on excessive optimism of recovery in the housing market. ...'
www.productmagazine.co.uk/index.php/society/
Please or to access all these features
Please
or
to access all these features
News
Why are developers being allowed to build on greenfield sites, and why are the new builds often so ugly? (Edinburgh)
7 replies
Solopower1 · 24/05/2013 20:54
OP posts:
Please create an account
To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.