The story says a 14 year old forced a 4 year old to perform a sex act on him. A number of things on here are his parents knew he was watching porn and didn't stop watching it. It appears that his mum is a child minder, and this 4 year old was in her care. What the hell was this child doing in his sole care long enough to do this.
Also while I agree porn might be partly to blame, surely this judge has now handed over a "porn made me do it" defence to every sex offender??
I also suggest his parents are stupid to then allow him to continue to access porn after the fact!
It's ridiculous dp was very into hardcore porn at that age yet he would never abuse a child. Porn can't be blamed for his actions. In another case a 14 year old abused the 5 year old daughter of family friends and used the same defence and got let off. He still goes to the same school as one of the family friends other dc.
I find it very worrying the lenient sentences given for child abuse and child pirn cases. The parents in this case definately have a case to answer for and she should be struck off.