15lb 7 oz baby born (that's 7kg) in England.

(40 Posts)
duchesse Wed 27-Mar-13 13:40:11

Ouchee, poor mum. I hope he doesn't end up with any problems- he seems to be doing really well despite a dodgy start.

ChippingInIsEggceptional Wed 27-Mar-13 20:31:59

What a cutie smile

But ouuuuuuuuuuuuuuchhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh

GetOeuf Wed 27-Mar-13 20:36:25

He is a sweet looking dear little boy. Interesting shag what you say about sugar.

I do hope he is healthy and his poor mother is ok, she is only young. Must have been traumatic,bless her.

ToThreeOrNotToThree Wed 27-Mar-13 21:00:21

Muriel - Sorry, all I really meant was that newspapers like to take throwaway comments and make them into big things. So you can't rely too much on quotes in those types of articles. Not that she couldn't easily be traumatised.

muriel76 Wed 27-Mar-13 21:18:06

Oh, I see. Thanks for explaining smile

Crutchlow35 Fri 29-Mar-13 11:00:40

He is lovely!

I remember during my section the surgeon saying we have got a decent big baby here. It is on video too. Even a scan to check for breech said big baby. I too was scared.

Ds was 6lb when born.

bigkidsdidit Fri 29-Mar-13 11:36:56

OMG I should not have read that at 30 weeks pg.

And I've been eating masses of sugar all pregnancy

eek!

lljkk Fri 29-Mar-13 11:52:42

I think that proves once and for it's presentation not size that determines how a baby needs to be born.

Wowza.

skratta Fri 29-Mar-13 11:59:14

Eek. He looks lovely though, and ouch for his mum! And he has adorable hair.

notcitrus Fri 29-Mar-13 12:53:58

My dad's family were around that size at birth - II've seen the newspaper articles calling my uncle the largest baby in the county. Granny didn't have a problem - head size was fairly average apparently.
Did mean I was a bit bemused at the modern obsession of keeping babies below 9lb before birth.

Was quite glad though when they kept telling me ds looked very average - ds and dd were spot on the national averages for their race and sex.

janajos Sat 30-Mar-13 09:18:50

My three boys were all around 11lbs, largest one was 11lbs 6oz. I was tested repeatedly for gestational diabetes, and didn't have it. However ,none of mine were puffy like that when they were born (just huge!!), not that he isn't very cute indeed..... Just wonder why this wasn't picked up at the 20wk scan as he is clearly very long as well as big... I have every sympathy for his poor mother, I felt disabled during the last month or so of each pregnancy and did not enjoy that part of child bearing at all... For me, the birth was a relief each time....

He looks beautiful, seems healthy, well done to the little family!

thezebrawearspurple Sun 31-Mar-13 20:12:13

Why wasn't she scanned? There are lots of problems that can be avoided or dealt with by regular scans as they are picked up immediately. As for those saying the scans aren't always accurate, most of the time they are very close, the newer scans are very accurate and a 15 and a half pound baby would have been picked up as dangerously large!!!

Lucky the baby was born alive, healthy and the poor mother not permanently disabled. That could have gone so wrong.

abbyfromoz Sun 31-Mar-13 20:25:16

I was told at my 20 week scan (last one i had) that DD was growing normally- if not slightly on the smaller side. I gave birth to a 10.5lbs baby. The problem with having your scans at this stage is that babies do most of their fattening up in the final weeks.
15lbs is a different story! But i do think there should be a later scan involved in all pregnancies for this reason.

Blimey, surely she must have had GD for him to be that huge?

JakeBullet Sun 31-Mar-13 20:28:30

What an utterly gorgeous baby he is though...I love big babies.....even ones THAT big.

DyeInTheEar Sun 31-Mar-13 22:41:04

I had a big baby - though titchy compared to this one. DS3 was 10lb10oz and had him with just gas and air. The first thing I thought when I heard this story was that this woman had been let down during her pg. I was measuring big from about 20 weeks -at least 4 weeks ahead. The community midwife didn't seem concerned at all and said it was probably fluid and just laughed each time I was measured. I didn't have many appointments because it was my 3rd. But my scans were showing a big baby and so were my measurements. It's just nothing was put in place to monitor the labour. I was uncomfortably huge and everyone was commenting on the size of my bump. I was also allowed to go two weeks over - even though I raised concerns a few times - and it was pretty awful SPD wise and looking after my other DCs.

Labour was much harder than with DD2 - contractions stopped and started and I was pushing without contractions for about 40 minutes... and getting the head out was very difficult - my midwife said "oh my god" in horror when the head came out and raised the issue on my behalf - she said that more should have been done during the pg to monitor growth more closely and that I shouldn't have been allowed to go 42+1.

He's amazing though. Big babies are just lovely. He's 3 months and in 9 month clothes.

Join the discussion

Join the discussion

Registering is free, easy, and means you can join in the discussion, get discounts, win prizes and lots more.

Register now