Flexible work changes 'reviewed'(46 Posts)
"Plans to increase parents' rights to request flexible working are to be reconsidered, Downing Street says.
No 10 said Business Secretary Lord Mandelson was looking at "all regulations due to come into force", given the economic uncertainty. "
I think this would be a really bad move on Labour's part. I understood that a request could be turned down if the business had a good reason to do so, so what exactly would this achieve?
In our local primary, all the ks1 classes, and some ks2 are now job shares, on a merry-go-round that alters with the various maternity leaves. Whilst it might be more difficult for the HT to work it all out, it is otherwose win-win, as the teachers get the flexibility they need to enjoy their own small children without being completely exhausted by FT work, and the puils have the advantage of being taught by different people, wiht differtn intests and aptutdes. The school retains experienced teachers they might lose if they isisted on Ft only, and teh teachers retain theri foothold in th working worl and Pension rights. So what's not to like about it? And it appears that teaching is one of the most suitable careers to be flexible.
I think I tend to agree that it's pretty much impossible, that's the trouble. As it is for anyone who is in a job where they have to be timetabled to be in a certain place at a certain time.
I guess I just think it's a bit narrow-minded to be cynical about a great concept purely because it doesn't fit in with your particular set of circumstances.
Many people will benefit from the legislation and many teachers will have benefited by being able to do jobshares or part-time working - maybe that particular solution doesn't suit your wife but does that honestly mean the whole concept is "crap anyway"? (your original point)
BTW lots of my friends and family are teachers so I do sympathise - I'm not anti-teachers or anything!
I'm not suggesting you are - I am just wondering what you'd like to see happen, or what options you think there should be. Not being a teacher, I dont know these things. I'm not attacking your opinion, I just want to explore it
So did my DD's Y1 teachers. I don't think I've ever said job-sharing can't be done. But (I've said this several times now) in order to do it, you have to be in the position to do half a job.
My DD's Yr 1 teachers work on a job share basis.
I think she's perfectly entitled to be cynical. She doesn't moan about it - she knows she gets good holidays. It only comes up when "flexible working" is mentioned.
I haven't missed your point - I was pointing out that you can't always have exactly what you want and that flexible working is about finding something that works within the parameters of your job.
Yes, if you are in certain fields and are not prepared to cut your hours or jobshare then flexible working is not going to be possible. That's why it's called flexible working - not rearrange-your-timetable-exactly-how-you-like-but-without-taking-a-cut-in-pay-or-hours working.
I would love to only work term-times - that's completely impossible in my job, it simply couldn't be done and it's not worth thinking about. I could be complaining that my job therefore doesn't offer truly flexible working because I can't have exactly what I want out of it - but I accept that that solution will be open to some people, but sadly not me if I stay in my current field.
Your DW chose a career where she can only work termtimes - but some other forms of flexible working are closed to her. I can't see why that means she shoudl be cynical about the whole concept, just because one particular form of the idea doesn't work for her.
youngvisiter - demand is perhaps the wrong word, I know. But you've missed my point - it's near-impossible for a full-time teacher (or anyone else who is in a job with a fixed timetable determined some months ahead) to ask for that kind of flexible working.
yes but I couldn't just "demand" to have whatever I liked off from work either. I had to find a solution that worked for me and my employer. I'd much prefer a slightly different setup in fact, but it would have had disadvantages for the rest of the team so I've got a compromise that gives me some of what I want and some of what work wants.
Flexible working isn't just about marching up and rearranging your worklife exactly how you want it.
I realise that you were just giving an example UQD, but say in that situation your DW really needed Monday mornings off for some particular reason, she could perhaps negotiate a jobshare so that another teacher took Monday and Tuesday, and she took Weds, Thurs and Fri. Sure - it wouldn't be the exact solution she'd demanded - but it would have the result she needed.
VVV, it's not necessarily something I am demanding. It's just that I know DW gets very cynical about "flexible" working. She knows that if she went and demanded to have, say Monday mornings off, the answer would be "well, who's going to do your register and teach year 7?"
shall i test my breast on this one too?
UQD, I work 4 days a week, also have had my PPA time rearranged to facilitate expressing at work while I'm still BFing. Spend a couple of hours at school each weekend doing admin and although my MPS has been reduced to 0.8 I have retained my full TLR allowance as I'm still fully responsible for the role. So it works for me.
And yes, this is nonsense, once again the Labour govt has got all over-excited about placating 'industry'.
How would you like to see flexible working for teachers UQD?
Labour will lose my vote if they follow through with this. I am really feeling the benefit of my (civil service job) flexible working policy. First I worked PT when I went back to work, but now my DH's company retracted his ability to also work PT so we could share care of DD my work have allowed me to temporally work FT as my husband left his job due to their inflexibility and is now taking them to a tribunal for not adhering to the flexible working policy and withdrawing DH's right to work PT hours without adequate reason.
Also I think they are now not going to extend the right to SMP to 52 weeks? Did I hear that right?
(Why won't this post???!!)
It's patently mothers who will suffer the most if flexible working rights are eroded, ie this is a sexist policy.
Totally what I would expect from Mandelson, however
He is part of the Gay Mafia
I'm sure there was something on the radio today which said, to the effect, that people should stop moaning about flexible hours and equal pay "as things are never going to be equal" so we should stop moaning and get on with it!
Though it was a local radio station so I dont think I'll be able to dig anything out. I was a bit
What really, really annoys me about this, is that either it's right to have work life balance for the good of families, or it's not. It is utterly unprincipled and inconsistent to say it's a necessity when the economy is doing well, but not when times are bad. Either families need work life balance, or they don't. Either we need equal opportunities, or we don't. Imagine if they'd decided to scrap the right not to be racially harrassed at work at the first sign of a downturn "because we can't afford that particular luxury right now." In disgraceful.
I'm lucky where I work, we do offer a flexible approach to work. There are examples of job shares / compressed hours / flexible start/finish times / reduced hours etc.
When I went back, all I requested as changing my hours from 9-5:15 Mon to Thur and 9-4:15 on a Fri to 8:00-4:00 daily, and making up the 15 mins difference. It made such a difference to me because I miss most of the traffic in both journeys, and can be home with DD at 5, whereas its 6:30 on the other hours, and shes in bed at 7:00.
One of the girls in the office, she came back on normal hours after her first, but after her second, applied for compressed hours, so she does 8:45 until 6:00 Mon to Thur with 1/2 lunch and does not work Friday. She's now back after her third and working the same hours. It suits her lifestyle and circumstances.
We have one girl who worked 3days a week when she came back, and as her DD joined school, she changed to five days but shorter hours, so fits in the school run and pick up.
Everybody else is on standard hours but we do flexi time so can make up hours and take hours here and there which is nice.
We have had people been refused requests for flexible hours / different hours etc, but thats usually higher up the chain and specific work where the business case arguement can be used.
I have found our work approach to be really good, and certainly I feel happier working there based on the fact they do listen to requirements. I'm often amazed to know some companies (esp well known ones) do not offer a flexible approach.
Well part-time is one part of flexible working is it not? Another is annualised hours - which people generally use to do term-time working - again that is what most teachers do isn't it? There are lots of different flexible working schemes - and not all are going to be appropriate for all jobs - but the legislation is there so that parents can initiate a discussion about what they'd like to do, and how it might be achieved. Not all employers will be able to offer all potential options - but that doesn't mean it's not worthwhile at all.
Yes, fine if you are part-time...
A couple of my DD's primary school teachers did a job share - worked pretty well. I'm sure there are loads of other examples of teachers working flexible hours.
"It's crap anyway." - I don't agree!
Sure the legislation could do with a bit more muscle - and sure, an employer can find a way out if they really want to, but it's better than nothing, and it's definitely given employees much more leverage than before. THere's absolutely no way I would have got my request through prior to the current legislation (I know because several colleagues tried and failed).
As for teachers - well there are various ways depending on what age group you teach, but of course some jobs are easier to accommodate than others, that's just a fact of life. Doesn't mean the whole principle is a bad idea.
It's crap anyway. How does it work for teachers?
Oh, God. How utterly, utterly depressing.
Join the discussion
Please login first.