is it sexist to think that mothers generally (though not always) make the best primary parent(37 Posts)
in terms of (again stereotypical) women's strength in juggling, negotiating etc and the fact that there is a closer physical bond with carrying and suckling the child.
I am not saying that in many instances fathers don't make great primary care-givers, nor am I saying that mothers have to be the primary care-giver.
But does equality mean we must ignore physiological and psychological differences?
What d'ya think?
(Old thread alert!)
Mostly sexist I think. It's self-reinforcing - women tend to do most of the care-giving, so they tend to be better at it (in the way that people who do anything regularly tend to be better at it than people who do it less often).
But I don't think there's any innate reason why women should be better carers, certainly not once oxytocin has left the system (ie at the end of breastfeeding).
Breasfeeding is the difficult issue here IMO - I always wanted to BF on demand, and this is obviously not possible for most women in paid employment.
I'm sorry but snurk at "He used to take nappy sacs in his briefcase to sniff them when they were babies."
I can think of far better smells than a plastic bag tbh.
Yes it is very sexist. My husband is an equal parent in every way and has grieved since they were born because he is the higher earner and had to leave them to go to work. He used to take nappy sacs in his briefcase to sniff them when they were babies. He sets up a shrine of photos on his desk every morning and always gets up to them in the night. They cry out for him when they are hurt or have a bad dream. Obviously he isn't typical but just because most men don't doesn't mean they can't.
Lovesdogsandcats - I know a few brilliant dads and their wives are all normal mums. Just different experiences.
Well I believe that no, it is not sexist.I find that a lot of men, when their parenting is very good, it is usually inconsistent, with a hell of a lot of negatives to then outweigh the good episodes.
On the few occasions I have witnessed the man being the better parent, it has been when there was something seriously ammiss in the mother.
I disagree. I have been a SAHM since having ds four years ago, it is only in the last year that I have felt that I am as good at parenting as dh. When ds was smaller dh had far more patience and was much of a "natural parent" than I was.
arrgh Twig - I'd finally got the bloody womble tune out of my head by 8 o'clock, then I've come back on this thread
Well, my DH is a SAHD whilst I'm off earning the big bucks. This isn't so much choice and circumstances. I'm very happy with the arrangement, as we could not afford to lose my salary, even if DH was working, so it's him or a nanny/childminder, and I know which I'd prefer. The kids are 1 and 3 and he does brilliantly with them, but he's a very patient soul and I know not all men would be able to do what he does.
Having said all that - I would not have felt so comfortable with him as the primary care giver when both LO's were new born to say, 6 months, because I firmly believe there is some kind of neurotic natural hyper-alertness that exists in a new mother which makes them more instinctively sensitive to a baby's needs. Even if we don't realise it at the time...feeding of course is a big thing, but I found that I would be meticulous about making sure every eventuality was catered for, for eg if we left the house, whereas DH would often go out with the sun shining, be caught in a downpour, but not have the raincover, a blanket, or anything to protect DD/DS. He'd also forget to check temp of food or bath water...and was never as careful about sterilizing etc as I was.
Of course it was a lot more relaxed 2nd time around, and once babes hit 9-10 months they are pretty resilient little things and there's nothing much I worry about now in terms of be being able to do it better then DH, IYSWIM.
Ok have read the thread and find it bizarre. The definition of primary parent seems to range from filling in school forms and knowing where the socks are to being the one the child turns to when ill.
Are you really saying that women across the board are better at all of this than men are? Then yes, I think it's sexist.
Why do you have to define one parent as primary? Why not equal, doing different things in their own ways?
Oops - although I can be a pedant - I was actually being lazy... didn't feel like formulating a whole thought of my own when yours almost summed up what I was trying to say? Or was what you were trying to say the same as what I was trying to say? [if you get through that sentence, well done!]
I thought your point was that women tend to be better caregivers because of their nature, while my point was not that they're better, but that they more naturally step up because of their nature. This may or not make them better?
Am I just losing it completely and should retire back to the piles of work I've been doing today?
no .. this is surely the time to remember you're a womble remember You^'^e a womble remember you're a womble remember You^'^e a womble remember-ember-ember what a womble-omble-omble you are
How are we defining primary parent? As a person who stays at home with the children?
er, Bling, is this the time for pedantry?
yes but Anna i know a little girl who is very close to both parents but uses her dad as a comforter in the way that my ds uses me. She was breastfed but her dad has been the primary caregiver since she was one (she is now almost two)
"Not sure I would go as far as to say generally it means women make a better primary parent, but probably a lot to do with why women tend to be."
I would change this sentence slightly to read,
"not sure I would go as far as to say generally it means women make a better primary parent, but probably a lot to do with why women tend to be the primary parent."
Seems to me it's not that women or men are better, but that women tend to take naturally take on the responsibility more. Doesn't mean they're always the better primary parent. I think when men have to take on the responsibility - for whatever reason, by choice or circumstance - they are as likely to be good primary parents as women.
I actually don't believe men and women are psychologically different. There are as many differences between men and men as there are women and men.
so yes, imo it is sexist to think that women make the best primary carer.
I think that one of the main problems with the feminist movement is that in a drive to ensure that women could and would be taken seriously in the then predominantly male workplace (a good thing), the role of carer and nurturer that women had traditionally done, was given EVEN LESS status than it had previously had, making it seem like an unworthy and "second-class" way to spend one's time. Women may or may not be biologically programmed for that role, but I think that it is the extremely low status that makes it a contentious choice for both men and women to stay at home with children in our more "equal" times.
Also explains why nurses and primary school teachers are often undervalued and underpaid: caring and nurturing is just not sexy...
No it isn't sexist. The early years biological bond between mother and child is a scientific fact, not a cultural construction.
I was at a beginning of year parent-teacher meeting at my daughter's school yesterday. This is a class of children born in 2004, so aged between 3.8 and 4.8 at the beginning of the school year in September. The teacher commented (in entirely neutral terms) on the large number of children in the class who still had a biberon (bottle) and a doudou (comforter) and told the parents that by the end of the school year, none of the children would be using either any longer.
Bottles and comforters are cultural mother substitutes. Children of this age are still, biologically, extremely close to their mothers.
Oh yes, men and women v different, and to overlook that for the sake of equality v dumb imo.
Not sure I would go as far as to say generally it means women make a better primary parent, but probably a lot to do with why women tend to be.
...Making all use of the telephone and the doing the dinner and signing school forms and sorting the new mortgage and I have to make a project for school tomorrow mum and therefore old yogurt pots and eggboxes they find,
Stuff that the everyday bloke leaves behind....
tiny babies: I honestly think mothers are best, but with fathers doing stuff as well. As they get older it really evens out. DH and I share childcare and DS (nearly 2) thrives on our different styles (I hope). I am more cuddly, DH is better at the fun stuff.
I think what is sexist is to go from differences in nature and behaviour to an assertion about what gender is best in a certain role. It is sort of like saying that we have to be nurses rather than doctors because we are more "caring", when in fact the NHS is crying out for more empathetic doctors.
I aim to please.
Suckle is a BLEAH word, I meant, not term.
Underground, overground, wohming free,
The Wimmin's Collective Working Mothers Group are we....
Men are different to women - I'm not sexist - they are!
this is most definately not a SAHM / WOHM thread
this is a 'what is sexism?' and 'there really is a difference between men and women, why can't we acknowledge and be proud of it' thread
suckle is a valid term
and now I'm singing the womble song in my head .. cheers fabio
Join the discussion
Registering is free, easy, and means you can join in the discussion, get discounts, win prizes and lots more.Register now
Already registered with Mumsnet? Log in to leave your comment or alternatively, sign in with Facebook or Google.
Please login first.