My feed
Premium

Please
or
to access all these features

Whether you're interested in Roman, military, British or art history, join our History forum to discuss your passion with other MNers.

History club

They've just decided Richard III won't be buried in York

208 replies

LRDtheFeministDragon · 23/05/2014 11:17

You have to look at this document:

www.judiciary.gov.uk/wp-content/uploads/2014/05/richard-3rd-judgment-.pdf

It is cracking me up, properly. There's something so funny about seeing it all set out like that.

Just seen Tom Holland on twitter suggest Fotheringhay, the church where many York royals were buried. What do you think?

OP posts:
Report
EffectiveCommunication · 23/05/2014 11:21

Can you briefly explain? link looks long He is going to be burried in York now?

Report
Tiredemma · 23/05/2014 11:22

I really dont think he should be buried in Leicester.

Report
VivaLeBeaver · 23/05/2014 11:23

I don't think he should be buried in Leicester. If I went on holiday to Leicester and died there I wouldn't expect my dh to bury me there. I'd expect him to bring me home and bury me in the village churchyard.

Report
LRDtheFeministDragon · 23/05/2014 11:27

Oh, sorry. Yes, it is long and I didn't seriously mean you should read all of it. It just tickles me, as a medievalist, that they've set out an account they say optimistically they hope will be 'uncontroversial'. Grin Yeah, good luck with that.

Here's a shorter link from sky news: news.sky.com/story/1267535/court-rules-on-richard-iiis-burial-place

Basically, yes, it's Leicester but they could appeal.

I quite like the idea of Fotheringhay, partly for the reasons viva gives and partly because it's nearish Leicester (I am partisan for Leics, I reckon it needs all the tourism boost it can get).

OP posts:
Report
VivaLeBeaver · 23/05/2014 11:30

Who became king after Richard was killed?

Report
Lilymaid · 23/05/2014 11:31

Also reported on BBC. Basically, judgment states that the University and Ministry of Justice didn't have to consult others about the reburial.

Report
LRDtheFeministDragon · 23/05/2014 11:33

Henry VII (Henry VIII's dad).

OP posts:
Report
Tiredemma · 23/05/2014 11:34

Viva- Henry Tudor (Son of Margaret Beaufort) became King and so started the Tudor Dynasty

Report
SantasLittleMonkeyButler · 23/05/2014 11:36

Where were Anne Neville & their son (Edward was it?) buried?

Report
EffectiveCommunication · 23/05/2014 11:38

I would love to know who the distant family member were.

Report
Mama1980 · 23/05/2014 11:38

I agree as archaeological and historian it is kinda funny seeing it set out that way.
I love the idea of fotheringhay after all Richard duke of York, Cecily Neville and Edmund duke of Rutland were buried there in the reign of Edward IV both he and then then duke of Gloucester attended so must have thought it suitable.
It is a beautiful place.
Also they have some amazing sword marks in the stone (my son loves that part)
But anywhere where is can receive a dignified and peaceful burial would be fine. I find this claiming to know his wishes thing quite strange.

Henry tudor became king Richard as Henry VII following the battle of bosworth.

Report
TheWoollybacksWife · 23/05/2014 11:39

I'm delighted too. I live fairly close to Leicester and my DD is studying Archaeology there.

Although...

I live even closer to Fotheringhay Grin

Report
SantasLittleMonkeyButler · 23/05/2014 11:39

Ah, Westminster Abbey.

I think he should be buried wherever he would have been buried had he died as a reigning King, from natural causes.

So, probably London or Fotheringhay.

Report
LRDtheFeministDragon · 23/05/2014 11:41

They're named in the long document, effective.

It all sounds very complicated.

mama - yes, it is beautiful. I guess a practical issue is that it's not very tourist-friendly (out in the middle of nowhere). I know that's not a very respectful way to look at it, though.

OP posts:
Report
funnyossity · 23/05/2014 11:41

My Yorkshire family are adamant they know what he'd have wanted Mama!

This is a (surprisingly) hot topic with them so I'm glad Mumsnet can keep me updated.

Report
JodieGarberJacob · 23/05/2014 11:41

The sky article implies that distant relatives shouldn't have the last word but I would have thought that everyone in the entire world (apart from Leicester) would want the bones buried at York or another family site. Boo to the ruling!

Report
LRDtheFeministDragon · 23/05/2014 11:45

Why York, though?

He thought York stank, apparently, despite the claims he had a special relationship with it.

OP posts:
Report
ExcuseTypos · 23/05/2014 11:45

I hadnt realised he'd actually been buried. I thought he'd laid where he died in battleBlush

Report
Ludways · 23/05/2014 11:45

Boooo!!!

Report
LRDtheFeministDragon · 23/05/2014 11:46

I thought that for ages too! It's not as if it was a terribly dignified burial first time round.

OP posts:
Report
Ludways · 23/05/2014 11:46

Boooo!!!

Report
WillieWaggledagger · 23/05/2014 11:47

i have to say i don't ahve an opinion either way, i just find it fascinating

if his family had recovered his body at the time, where would he likely have been buried? if fotheringhay then that might be a nice compromise, though perhaps not workable as others have outlined

Report

Don’t want to miss threads like this?

Weekly

Sign up to our weekly round up and get all the best threads sent straight to your inbox!

Log in to update your newsletter preferences.

You've subscribed!

LRDtheFeministDragon · 23/05/2014 11:47

thewoolly, I am Envy of where you live. That's a beautiful part of the country.

OP posts:
Report
JodieGarberJacob · 23/05/2014 11:50

What's the MN consensus? My feeling is Westminster Abbey, but not sure why.

Report
meditrina · 23/05/2014 11:51

The distant family number was named in that document: Mr Stephen Nicolay, the 16th great-nephew (plus some assorted other 16/17/18th great nephews).

I've only skimmed the document, but it was fascinating in places (legally arid in others).

Report
Please create an account

To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.