DS1 went through the Uni application process last year and from the threads for previous years, last year and the ones for the current cycle there seem to be a set of commonly recurring questions around how much flex there is around required grades to get an offer, how much leeway there might be if actual results fall short and / or are not spot on the requirements, and what grades get a place through Clearing.
Universities and UCAS have (surely??) all this data, so what is stopping it being published?
To my very simple way of thinking, possible overly simplistic, would it be that difficult for Unis and / or UCAS to publish at subject level more specific and useful data?
Here’s my take on it. I’ve used A2 grades as the basis, but the structure could as easily be applied to A2 points, IB or Btec. I did put in in a nice little excel table to make it easier to understand however I’m not sure how I could paste that in or attach it, hence the rather wordy description below instead.
Top level summary – for Course X at Uni Y. The typical offer range is AAA to AAB with the aim of having between 180-220 students in any one year. In the most recent cycle for which data is available (ie I've made up) there were 1200 applications received, 750 offers made, and 207 actually took up a place.
First off Offers made by grade.
We know course X had 750 offers made so the next stage would be to show the offer grade breakdown. So for each grade combination for which offers were made ( AAA, AAA, AAB etc), and plus any unconditional offers how many:
A. Firm acceptances
B. Insurance acceptances
C. Rejections (eg the applicant neither Firmed nor Insured the offer)
For unconditional offers these could be split into unconditionals based on predicted grades, and then unconditionals based on achieved grades (for deferred entry applicants). In the latter case a breakdown would also be provided on achieved grades.
For a bit of added complexity there could be data on candidates rejected for Course X, but who received an offer for a different course.
For the sake of the example let’s say that out of the 750 offers made, 220 applicants firmed and 125 insured.
I'd suggest that this data be made available and published fairly quickly after applications have closed, so available to DCs starting their application process later that year.
Then Places taken up following results
Firstly our 220 Firm applications . Again broken down by the grade offer combination the data could show:
D. The number of applicants that achieved or exceeded the grade combination offered
E. The number of applicants who did not achieve the grade combination offered
F. The numbers of applicants who did not achieve the grade combination BUT were still offered a place on Course X.
Again for the sake of the example lets say the numbers in total were 158 (D), 112 (E), and 14 (F). So at this point Course X has 172 (D+F) confirmed students.
As with the offers if we wanted to complicate things a little further the number not achieving the firm offer, but being then offered an alternative course at Uni Y could also be included along with the number who accepted the alternative course.
Next our 125 insurance applicants. Again broken down by grade offer combination the data could show:
G. The number that achieved their Firm offer, or even if falling short, still had their Firm offer confirmed. We know they won’t be coming to Uni Y, to read Course X
H. The number that missed their firm offer / were not offered a place at their firm but did meet the insurance requirements of Uni Y.
I. The number that missed their firm offer and Uni Y’s insurance offer
J. The number that although missing the insurance offer were accepted at Uni Y.
To keep with the example the numbers were 100 (G), 15 (H) , 10 (I) and 0 (J)
Course X now has 187 confirmed places. (172+15) (D+F+H+J)
Moving on to adjustment applicants . Using the same framework as the other groups but this time by achieved , as opposed to offer, grade combinations.
K. The Number of adjustment requests
L. The number of adjustment acceptances
Lets say that through adjustment another 10 places were confirmed for Course X
Finally places allocated through Clearing . As with adjustment this would show the achieved grade combination and for each such combination (obviously only those combos which received an application through clearing):
M. The number of clearing applications
N. The number of clearing acceptances.
Uni Y were pretty tough in this cycle and took just 10 applicants through clearing, thus giving 207 places filled for Course X in total.
As far as I can see UCAS produce a raft of very top level stats at the end of each cycle, but nothing along these lines. Some Unis publish a bit more , Cambridge have their rather swizzy interactive graphs, Durham publish quite a bit of top level data, but neither get into the what really matters. Then a whole raft of Unis seem to publish next to nothing, or literally nothing.
So is this the kind of data that would be useful to DCs (and parents) - ideally whilst shown for each year including a number of years of data - , and if so, why is it not currently available? Or if it is where is it hidden away?
Please or to access all these features
Please
or
to access all these features
Talk to other parents whose children are preparing for university on our Higher Education forum.
Higher education
University Admissions - the data we'd really like to see ????
36 replies
boys3 · 18/11/2014 16:13
OP posts:
Don’t want to miss threads like this?
Weekly
Sign up to our weekly round up and get all the best threads sent straight to your inbox!
Log in to update your newsletter preferences.
You've subscribed!
Please create an account
To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.